Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07749196

Virtual Reality Exergaming During Work Breaks in Office Employees

The goal of this trial is to learn how different exercise formats used during workplace breaks affect the immediate physical and emotional responses of office employees. It will also examine participants' leisure experience and the usability of virtual reality exercise.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Do gamified virtual reality exercise, instructor-led virtual reality exercise, and traditional video exercise produce different changes in heart rate and perceived effort? * Do these exercise formats produce different changes in how pleasant or unpleasant and how activated participants feel? * Do the exercise formats differ in positive and negative experiences, flow, exercise enjoyment, and satisfaction with the activity? * Do the two virtual reality formats differ in system usability and virtual reality-related discomfort?

Researchers will compare the three exercise formats to identify differences in participants' immediate responses and experiences.

Participants will:

* Complete three 10-minute exercise sessions on separate days and in a randomly assigned order * Take part in a gamified virtual reality boxing session, an instructor-led virtual reality exercise session, and a traditional video exercise session * Wear a heart rate monitor and complete brief questionnaires before and after the sessions

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

24 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Akdeniz University Faculty of Sports Sciences

Antalya, 07070, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Abdullah Kayhan

CONTACT

[email protected]

+905344995878

Tennur Yerlisu Lapa, PhD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged between 24 and 60 years
  • Being a healthy adult employed full-time in an administrative office-based position at Akdeniz University
  • Having worked full-time in the current administrative unit for at least one year
  • Having a low or moderate physical activity level according to the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF)
  • Not engaging in regular exercise
  • Having no health condition that contraindicates participation in physical activity according to the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q)
  • Not having regularly used active virtual reality technologies within the previous six months

Exclusion criteria

  • A history of epilepsy, migraine, vertigo, or vestibular disorder
  • A history of dizziness, nausea, or similar discomfort during virtual reality exposure
  • Current use of antidepressants or medications that affect the central nervous system
  • A history of neurological, cardiovascular, or orthopedic disease, except for controlled hypertension
  • Pregnancy
  • Presence of a visual or hearing impairment

Treatment and study plan

Gamified Virtual Reality Exergaming (GVRE)

Behavioral

Participants will complete one 10-minute gamified virtual reality exergaming session using the FitXR BOX mode, a Meta Quest 3 headset, and handheld controllers. Participants will perform boxing-based whole-body movements involving virtual targets. The intervention includes game-related elements such as scoring, pacing, performance tracking, and real-time visual and auditory feedback.

Serious Virtual Reality Exergaming (SVRE)

Behavioral

Participants will complete one 10-minute serious virtual reality exergaming session using the FitXR SCULPT mode and a Meta Quest 3 headset. Participants will follow structured whole-body exercise movements demonstrated by a virtual instructor. The condition emphasizes movement guidance and exercise performance and contains minimal game-related elements.

Traditional Video Exercise (TVE)

Behavioral

Participants will complete one 10-minute video-based exercise session. Participants will follow an instructor displayed on a two-dimensional screen without using a virtual reality headset. The exercise content will correspond to the serious virtual reality exergaming condition but will not include virtual reality interaction or game-related elements. This intervention will serve as the active comparison condition.

Primary outcomes

  1. Resting and Mean Exercise Heart Rate

    Time frame: During each of the three experimental sessions: during the 3-minute pre-intervention rest period and continuously throughout the 10-minute intervention

    Heart rate will be continuously recorded in beats per minute (bpm) using a Polar H10 chest-strap sensor. For each experimental condition, resting heart rate will be defined as the mean heart rate recorded during the 3-minute rest period immediately before the intervention. Mean exercise heart rate will be defined as the mean heart rate recorded throughout the 10-minute exercise session. The effects of the intervention conditions on heart rate will be evaluated by comparing resting and mean exercise heart rate values across the gamified virtual reality exergaming, serious virtual reality exergaming, and traditional video exercise conditions.

  2. Change in Rating of Perceived Exertion

    Time frame: Immediately before and immediately after each 10-minute intervention during each of the three experimental sessions

    Perceived exertion will be assessed using the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale, which ranges from 6 (no exertion or very, very light exertion) to 20 (maximal exertion). The outcome will be saved as the post-intervention score and the pre-intervention score for each condition. A higher positive value indicates a greater increase in perceived exertion.

  3. Change in Affective Valence Assessed With the Feeling Scale

    Time frame: Immediately before and immediately after each 10-minute intervention during each of the three experimental sessions

    Affective valence will be assessed using the single-item Feeling Scale, which ranges from -5 (very bad) to +5 (very good). The outcome will be saved as the post-intervention score and the pre-intervention score for each condition. A higher positive value indicates a more favorable change in how the participant feels.

  4. Change in Felt Arousal Assessed With the Felt Arousal Scale

    Time frame: Immediately before and immediately after each 10-minute intervention during each of the three experimental sessions

    Felt arousal will be assessed using the single-item Felt Arousal Scale, which ranges from 1 (low arousal) to 6 (high arousal). The outcome will be saved as the post-intervention score and the pre-intervention score for each condition. A higher positive value indicates a greater increase in felt arousal.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Positive and Negative Experience

    Time frame: Immediately before and immediately after each 10-minute intervention during each of the three experimental sessions

    Positive and negative experience will be assessed using the 12-item Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE). The scale consists of six positive-experience items and six negative-experience items, each rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (never) to 5 (always). Separate scores will be calculated for the positive experience subscale (SPANE-P) and the negative experience subscale (SPANE-N). Each subscale score ranges from 6 to 30. Higher SPANE-P scores indicate greater positive experience, whereas higher SPANE-N scores indicate greater negative experience. The scale will be administered immediately before and immediately after each intervention, and pre- and post-intervention scores for both subscales will be compared across the three intervention conditions.

  2. Flow State

    Time frame: Immediately after each 10-minute intervention during each of the three experimental sessions

    Flow state will be assessed using the nine-item state version of the Short Flow State Scale-2. The scale evaluates dimensions of the immediate flow experience, including challenge-skill balance, action-awareness merging, clear goals, unambiguous feedback, concentration, sense of control, loss of self-consciousness, transformation of time, and autotelic experience. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (do not agree at all) to 5 (completely agree). Higher total scores indicate a more intense flow experience.

  3. Exercise Enjoyment

    Time frame: Immediately after each 10-minute intervention during each of the three experimental sessions

    Exercise enjoyment will be assessed using the eight-item version of the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES-8). The scale consists of eight bipolar items rated on 7-point response scales and evaluates how participants feel about the physical activity they have just completed. Higher total scores indicate greater exercise enjoyment.

  4. Activity Satisfaction

    Time frame: Immediately after each 10-minute intervention during each of the three experimental sessions

    Activity satisfaction will be assessed using the three-item Activity Satisfaction Scale. Each item is rated on a 7-point scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (completely agree). Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the exercise activity completed during the experimental session.

  5. System Usability

    Time frame: Immediately after each of the two 10-minute virtual reality interventions: GVRE and SVRE

    Perceived system usability will be assessed using the 10-item System Usability Scale. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The scale evaluates participants' perceptions of the effectiveness, efficiency, ease of use, and overall usability of the virtual reality system. Higher scores indicate better perceived system usability.

  6. Virtual Reality Discomfort

    Time frame: Immediately after each of the two 10-minute virtual reality interventions: GVRE and SVRE

    Virtual reality-related discomfort will be assessed using the nine-item Virtual Reality Discomfort Scale. The scale evaluates two dimensions of discomfort: oculomotor symptoms, such as eye strain and blurred vision, and disorientation symptoms, such as dizziness and nausea. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). Higher scores indicate greater virtual reality-related discomfort.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Abdullah Kayhan

CONTACT

[email protected]

+905344995878

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Akdeniz University

Other

Collaborators

  • The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey

Registry information

Official study title

Virtual Reality Exergaming for Workplace Breaks: Acute Physical and Affective Responses, Leisure Experience, and Usability in Office Employees

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Aug 6, 2026
Registry last updated
Aug 6, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.