University of Granada
Granada, 18016, Spain
NCT Number: NCT07388134
One of the most prevalent causes of pain on a global scale is chronic musculoskeletal pain. Low back pain is a prevalent manifestation of chronic musculoskeletal pain.
There are a wide vary of no pharmacologic treatment for chronic pain. From a physiotherapy perspective, the chronic pain management should be oriented towards increasing the self-management of people with chronic pain. The management components in question are therapeutic exercise and education.
High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is a novel therapeutic exercise strategy that has been shown to reduce pain and disability in chronic low back pain. It is a hopeful strategy to enhance motivation to treatment. Pain neuroscience education (PNE) has also been demonstrated to enhance pain and disability in chronic low back pain. Finally, virtual reality (VR) has been demonstrated to be effective in the chronic low back pain management.
Despite the benefits mentioned in these three therapies being isolated, there are no studies that have compared VR-based HIIT (VR-HIIT) with PNE in chronic low back pain. The use of these interventions may increase the intervention benefits. The investigators hypothesise that VR-HIIT with PNE can reduce pain intensity, enhance fear of movement and improve motivation for treatment in chronic low back pain. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of VR-HIIT with PNE in chronic low back pain.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Granada, 18016, Spain
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A single session of 70-90 minutes.
A single session of 70-90 minutes.
Time frame: Baseline, during the intervention and 48-72 hours post-intervention
To assess pain intensity using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. Scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Higher scores indicate greater intensity.
Time frame: Baseline and 48-72 hours post-intervention
To assess pain pressure threshold. The measurement will be taken in the paravertebral and tibialis anterior muscles with the algometer Force One FPIX 50. The measurement points will be lumbar region bilaterally 5 cm from the spinous processes of L3 and L5; and right tibialis anterior, 5 cm below the tibial tuberosity. The assessor will place the algometer perpendicular and applied increasing pressure. until the pressure became painful. The mean of 3 measurements was recorded.
Time frame: Baseline and 48-72 hours post-intervention
To assess pain modulation using algometer Force One FPIX 50. The pressure pain threshold will be evaluated in the tibialis anterior muscle and the deltoid muscle. Then the conditioning stimulus will be introduced. A clamp will be placed on the earlobe for 60 seconds. When pain VAS of the earlobe become more than 60 mm, pain pressure threshold will be evaluated again
Time frame: Baseline and 48-72 hours post-intervention
To assess fear to movement using the TAMPA Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK). Scores range from 1 (totally disagree) to 4 (totally agree). The final score can range between 11 and 44 points. Higher scores indicate greater perceived fear of movement.
Time frame: Baseline and 48-72 hours post-intervention
To assess catastrophizing of pain using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Scores range from 0 (nothing at all) to 4 (all the time). The final score range from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate greater levels of catastrophism
Time frame: Baseline and 48-72 hours post-intervention
To assess pain intensity and interference using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Scores range from 0 (no pain/does not interfere) to 10 (worst pain imaginable/completely interferes). Higher scores indicate greater intensity and interference.
Time frame: Baseline and 48-72 hours post-intervention
To assess awareness, consciousness, vigilance and observation of pain using the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire (PVAQ). Scores range from 0 (never) to 5 (always). The total scores range between 0 and 80. Higher scores indicate greater awareness, consciousness, vigilance and observation of pain.
Time frame: Baseline and 48-72 hours post-intervention
To assess fear and avoidance beliefs using Fear and Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Scores range from 0 (totally disagree) to 6 (totally agree). The total score range from 0 to 96. Higher scores indicate a higher degree of fear avoidance beliefs.
Time frame: Baseline and 48-72 hours post-intervention
To assess quality of life using the EuroQol-5D. Total score range from 1 (best health status) to 0 (death). The second part of the euroqol-5d is visual analogue scale that goes from 0 (worst state of health imaginable) to 100 (best state of health imaginable).
Time frame: Baseline and 48-72 hours post-intervention
To assess pain-self efficacy using 10 items Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (10-PSEQ). Scores range from 0 (not at all confident) and 6 (completely confident). A total score range from 0 to 60. Higher scores reflect stronger self-efficacy beliefs.
Time frame: Baseline and 48-72 hours post-intervention
To assess sleep quality using a numeric scale from 0 (worst sleep quality) to 10 (best sleep quality). Higher scores indicate greater sleep quality
Time frame: Baseline and 48-72 hours post-intervention
To assess disability using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Total scores range from 0% (no limitation) to 100% (maximum functional limitation). Higher scores indicate higher levels of disability.
Time frame: Baseline and 48-72 hours post-intervention
To assess functional status using the Patient-Specific Functioning Scale (PSFS). Scores range from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicating better functional status
Time frame: Baseline and 48-72 hours post-intervention
To assess mobility using the Fingertip-to-Floor test. It will be used to examine the ability to bend forward while standing, measuring the distance between the tip of the longest finger and the floor. Lower scores are associated with decreased symptoms across all outcome measures.
Time frame: Baseline
To assess motivation to treatment with the 15-item Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ). Scores range from 1 to 7 per item. Higher scores indicate greater motivation
Time frame: 48-72 hours post-intervention
To assess treatment-generated motivation with the 22-item Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI). Scores range from 1 to 7 per item. Higher scores indicate greater motivation
Time frame: 48-72 hours post-intervention
To assess satisfaction with the intervention with numeric scale from 0 (no satisfaction) to 10 (completely satisfaction). Higer scores indicate higher levels of satisfaction.
Time frame: During the intervention
To measure the number of adverse events that may occur during the intervention.
Time frame: During the intervention
To assess pain vigilance during the intervention with a numeric scale from 0 (none) to 10 (continuously).
Universidad de Granada
Other
Effects of Virtual Reality Based High-intensity Interval Training in Chronic Low Back Pain
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07280806
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP)
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07621302
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), Mindfulness Meditation
Izmir, Balçova, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07448766
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP)
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06694493
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP)
Kütahya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details