Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Clinical Trials Referral Office
CONTACT
Deirdre R. Pachman, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT07659158
This study is a prospective, minimal risk, non-randomized, single-arm study to determine feasibility and assess effectiveness of a Virtual Group Resilient Living Program (RLP) on anxiety, stress, quality of life (QOL), coping, and fatigue among patients with advanced cancer. The group RLP is a psychosocial intervention that consists of a total of 7 weekly sessions in which the interventionalist teaches the patients techniques on stress management and building resilience (mindfulness, uplifting emotions, reframe experiences through principles of gratitude, compassion, acceptance, meaning, and forgiveness). The group setting allows for support and connection amongst the patients, providing further support and motivation to practice the principles of the program.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Clinical Trials Referral Office
CONTACT
Deirdre R. Pachman, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The Resilient Living Program (RLP) is a virtual program consisting of online modules and virtual training sessions focused on techniques for managing stress and building resilience (mindful presence, uplifting emotions, and reframing experiences through principles of gratitude, compassion, acceptance, meaning, and forgiveness).
Other names: RLP
Participants will complete study-related surveys.
Time frame: Up to 1 year
Enrollment feasibility will be met if 42 patients are enrolled within a year.
Time frame: Up to 1 year
Completion feasibility will be met if at least 32 of 42 patients (≥75%) enrolled in the intervention arm attend at least 4 of the 7 program sessions.
Time frame: After week 7 session
measured by the three item responses from the Was It Worth It (WIWI) questionnaire. Acceptability will be met if at least 75% of respondents answer "Yes" to at least two out of the three items
Time frame: Baseline, after week 7 session, 30 days after week 7 session
Measured using the General Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD 7) scale, which is used to assess symptoms and feelings of anxiety over the past two weeks. The GAD-7 consists of 7 questions answered on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The total score ranges from 0 to 21 where 0 indicates no anxiety, 1-4 indicates minimal anxiety, 5-9 indicates mild anxiety, 10-14 indicates moderate anxiety, and 15-21 indicates severe anxiety.
Time frame: Baseline, after week 7 session, 30 days after week 7 session
Measured using the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), which is used to assess global perceived stress experienced by the participant over the preceding 30 days. The PSS consists of 10 questions assessing how often the participant felt or thought a certain way during the past month. Possible answers include: 0 - never; 1 - almost never; 2 - sometimes; 3 - fairly often, and 4 - very often. Possible scores range from 0 to 40, with lower scores indicating a better outcome (less stress).
Time frame: Baseline, after week 7 session, 30 days after week 7 session
Measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G), a 27-item questionnaire used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in cancer patients. Responses to each question are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Possible total scores range from 0-108, with higher scores indicating a better outcome/better QoL.
Time frame: Baseline, after week 7 session, 30 days after week 7 session
Measured using the Brief COPE (Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced), a 28-item questionnaire used to assess the different coping styles a person uses to manage stress. Each items is answered on a scale of 1 (I haven't been doing this at all) to 4 (I've been doing this a lot). The Brief COPE consists of 14 subscales, i.e. active coping, planning, positive reframing, acceptance, humour, religion, use of emotional support, use of instrumental support, self-distraction, denial, venting, substance use, behavioral disengagement, and self-blame, with two items per sub-scale. Scores on each subscales ranges from 2 to 8 with higher scores representing most-used coping styles. There is no overall composite score for this questionnaire.
Time frame: Baseline, after week 7 session, 30 days after week 7 session
Assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Fatigue questionnaire, a subscale of the PROMIS-29, which is used to assess fatigue and related symptoms over the past seven days. It consists of four items rated on a scale of 1(not at all) to 5 (very much). Higher scores indicate greater experiences of fatigue.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Mayo Clinic
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05663710
Adenocarcinoma, Advanced Cancer
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04657068
Acinar Cell Carcinoma, Adenocarcinoma
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07636382
Advanced Cancer, Celiac Disease
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06771219
Advanced Cancer, Advanced Solid Tumor
Newport Beach, California, United States
View Trial Details