Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03856060

Videos and Questionnaires in Assessing Patient Perception of Physician's Compassion, Communication Skills, and Professionalism During Clinic Visits

This trial assesses patient perception of physician's compassion, communication skills, and professionalism during clinic visits through the use of videos and questionnaires.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

M D Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

About this study

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare patients' perception of physicians' compassion after they watch the first scripted-video vignettes of physicians: one portraying a physician using a standard electronic health record (EHR) and the other one portraying a physician using an integrated model of EHR during communication.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare patients' perception of physicians' compassion after they watch the second scripted-video vignettes of physicians: one portraying a physician using a standard electronic health record (EHR) and the other one portraying a physician using an integrated model of EHR during communication.

II. To compare patients' perception of physicians' communication skills after they watch each scripted-video vignettes of physicians: one portraying a physician using a standard EHR and the other one portraying a physician using an integrated model of EHR during communication.

III. To compare patients' perception of physicians' professionalism after they watch each scripted-video vignettes of physicians: one portraying a physician using a standard EHR and the other one portraying a physician using an integrated model of EHR during communication.

IV. To compare patients' perception of physicians' compassion, communication skills and professionalism after they watch two scripted-video vignettes of physicians: one portraying a physician using a standard electronic health record (EHR) and the other one portraying a physician using an integrated model of EHR during communication.

V. To compare patients' preference after they watch two scripted-video vignettes of physicians sequentially: one portraying a physician using a standard EHR and the other one portraying a physician using an integrated model of EHR during communication.

VI. To examine patients' perception of EHR in healthcare delivery. VII. To establish demographic and clinical factors of patients preference for the physician.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 groups.

GROUP I: Patients complete questionnaires and watch a video portraying a physician using a standard electronic health record (EHR) and then another portraying a physician using an integrated model of EHR during communication over 35 minutes.

GROUP II: Patients complete questionnaires and watch a video portraying a physician using an integrated model of EHR and then another portraying a physician using a standard EHR during communication over 35 minutes.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with a diagnosis of cancer either early disease or advanced cancer defined as locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic disease.
  • Outpatients (either new referrals or follow-ups) seen in the Supportive Care Clinic.
  • English speaking.
  • Patients with normal cognitive status (Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale [MDAS] =< 6/30) who can understand the nature and purpose of the study and have the ability to complete the consent process.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who are experiencing severe symptom distress, including severe emotional distress and cognitive dysfunction, which may interfere with study participation. This will be measured by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS), and will be determined by the principal investigator and/or attending physician who is caring for the patient during that visit.

Treatment and study plan

Questionnaire Administration

Other

Complete questionnaires

video

Other

Watch videos of doctor and patient interaction in different settings

Primary outcomes

  1. Patients' perception of physicians' compassion after they watch the first video

    Time frame: 1 year" or "up to 24 weeks", "through study completion

    Quantified by the total score of ratings from a comprehensive 5-item tool which assesses dimensions such as warm/cold, pleasant/unpleasant, compassionate/distant, sensitive/insensitive, and caring/uncaring (ranging from 0 to 10 for each item, and from 0 to 50 for the total score). Physicians' compassion, communication skills and professionalism will be compared between standard electronic health record (EHR) and integrated EHR groups at the end of each video using a two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test when appropriate. The mixed model will be applied to further explore the patterns of physicians' compassion, communication skills and professionalism from both videos. Patients' preference of physician and perception of EHR will be compared between standard EHR and integrated EHR groups using Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test when appropriate. Logistic regression model will also be employed.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Other

Collaborators

  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Registry information

Official study title

Patient Perception of Physician's Compassion, Communication Skills, and Professionalism During Clinic Visits: a Randomized Controlled Trial (EHR Study #2)

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Feb 27, 2019
Registry last updated
Sep 19, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.