Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Enrolling by Invitation

NCT Number: NCT06891079

Videodensitometric Angiographic Assessment of AR in the Cath-lab for Intraprocedural Guidance of TAVI in CHINA

This clinical trial, a prospective, randomized, multicenter study, assigns patients to either videodensitometry-guided TAVI or conventional TTE/TEE-guided TAVI (stand of care), with the primary endpoint being regurgitation fraction measured by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at discharge. Current AR assessment methods, like subjective visual grading or intraprocedural TTE, face limitations in objectivity and practicality, whereas videodensitometry offers real-time, quantitative feedback to guide corrective actions (e.g., post-dilation) during TAVI. If proven non-inferior, this approach could streamline workflows by reducing reliance on general anesthesia and complex imaging, potentially lowering complications and expanding accessibility, particularly in centers lacking advanced echocardiography resources.

Enrolling by Invitation

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Zhongshan hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Loading trial locations.

About this study

As the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedure matures, complications such as paravalvular regurgitation (PVR), stroke, conduction disturbances, vascular complications, and annular rupture have been targeted for further improving the long-term outcome of TAVI. Paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) is associated with mortality following TAVI, even in those with mild PVR. Accurate procedural assessment of AR-critical for successful TAVI. Aortic root angiography, typically using Seller's visual grading, is the first screening tool used in most laboratories for the detection of post-implantation AR and guidance of timely corrective measures (e.g. post-dilation, valve-in-valve and, most recently, retrieval and reposition of the valve). However, the Sellers classification of aortic regurgitation (AR) is subjective. Some centers use transthoracic echo to confirm residual AR. However, performing transthoracic echo in the Cath-lab in a prone position is challenging. Previous studies have demonstrated that TAVI performed exclusively under angiographic guidance with backup TTE is feasible and associated with reasonably good outcomes, similar to those of angiography and TEE-guided procedures. Quantitative aortographic assessment of AR is important for procedural TAVI guidance to facilitate timely decision-making to avert AR using balloon post-dilatation, retrieval-reposition, or valve-in-valve implantation.

CAAS A-Valve (quantitative assessment of regurgitation with videodensitometry in the left ventricle outflow tract) is a new tool to quantify AR developed by Pie Medical. This tool is an angiographic methodology that proved to be accurate, feasible, reproducible, and predictive of outcomes after TAVI. After extensive validation of this new technology in two different cohorts (from the Brazilian TAVI registry and Bad-Segeberg, Germany), hereby we propose to apply this currently off-line technology to guide decision making in the Cath-lab during TAVI.

The present trial is a prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, multi-center, non-inferiority trial. The primary objective of this trial is to determine whether TAVI procedure guided by videodensitometric assessment of aortography is non-inferior to TAVI implantation guided by Standard of care (usual practice) in terms of postprocedural quantitative aortic regurgitation. The primary endpoint of the study will be the Cardiac magnetic resonance-derived regurgitation fraction at discharge. This project is the first study to investigate the clinical utility of using video-densitometry in a randomized, controlled clinical trial to guide TAVI procedure. In centers with no current CAAS-A Valve software, Pie Medical will provide a research lease during the study period.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject has aortic stenosis with indication of TAVI implantation as determined by Heart Team.
  • Patient is at least 18 years of age.
  • Signed informed consent. The patient understands and accepts clinical follow-up.

Exclusion criteria

  • Subject is not willing to provide an informed consent form, or whose legal heirs object to their participation in the study.
  • If the patient is not suitable for participating in the study, based on the evaluation by the operators.
  • Cardiogenic shock.
  • Significant comorbidities precluding clinical follow-up (as judged by investigators).
  • History of TAVI or SAVR.
  • Renal insufficiency (GFR/MDRD <45 ml/min), which precludes in operator's opinion contrast injection during repeat aortography.

Treatment and study plan

Videodensitometric guided

Diagnostic Test

In the experimental arm, a TAVI device is implanted according to the local practice. Immediately after implantation, aortography is performed to quantitatively assess the aortic regurgitation (qAR). The aortography is analyzed using CAAS A-Valve (Pie-Medical, Maastricht, The Netherlands).

•If qAR is >17%, we recommend that corrective post-TAVI manoeuvres (post-dilatation, valve-in-valve, etc.) will be performed and angiography is repeated for the assessment of aortic regurgitation. If the qAR ≤17%, whether corrective post-TAVI manoeuvres (post-dilatation, valve-in-valve, etc.) will be performed is left to the discretion of the operators. Inform operators of the results of qAR and the threshold criteria. Continuous qAR was stratified into categorical variables according to the following pre-determined threshold criteria: (1) none or trace (qAR <6%); (2) mild (6% to ≤17%); and (3) moderate or severe (>17%).

At discharge, all the patients will undergo Cardiac magnetic resonance, the Car

Stand of care guided

Diagnostic Test

In the control arm, a TAVI device is implanted according to local practice. Immediately after implantation, TEE/TTE or aortography is performed as a part of usual practice.

  • The requirement of post-dilatation or any additional procedure is left to the discretion of the operator.
  • The operator judges the sufficient procedural outcome to end the procedure according to local practice.

At discharge, all the patients will undergo Cardiac magnetic resonance, the Cardiac magnetic resonance-derived regurgitation fraction (CMR-RF) will be analyzed as the primary endpoint.

Primary outcomes

  1. CMR-derived regurgitation fraction

    Time frame: at discharge 1 day, an average of 7days

    The Cardiac magnetic resonance-derived regurgitation fraction at discharge.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Medical cost

    Time frame: at discharge 1 day, an average of 7days

    Direct medical cost at discharge

  2. Radiation dose

    Time frame: during the procedure

    Amount of radiation dose

  3. Time in the Cathlab

    Time frame: during the procedure

    Time in the Cathlab

  4. Time for the TAVI procedure

    Time frame: during the procedure

    Time for the TAVI procedure

  5. All-cause mortality and its sub-categories

    Time frame: at discharge 1 day, an average of 7days; 30-day; 1 year

    All-cause mortality and its sub-categories defined by VARC 3

  6. All strokes

    Time frame: at discharge 1 day, an average of 7days;30-day; 1 year

    All strokes

  7. Any hospitalization and its sub-categories

    Time frame: 30-day, 1 year

    Any hospitalization and its sub-categories defined by VARC 3

  8. Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)

    Time frame: at discharge 1 day, an average of 7days; 30-day

    Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)(VARC 3 criteria: use the widely recognized kidney disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) definition of AKI)

  9. Type 3 (life-threatening) or Type 4 (leading to death) bleeding

    Time frame: at discharge 1 day, an average of 7days; 30-day; 1 year

    Type 3 (life-threatening) or Type 4 (leading to death) bleeding (VARC-3 criteria)

  10. Mild or more prosthetic valve regurgitation

    Time frame: 30-day, 1 year

    Mild or more prosthetic valve regurgitation [TTE assessment

  11. New permanent pacemaker implantation

    Time frame: at discharge 1 day, an average of 7days; 30-day, 1 year

    New permanent pacemaker implantation [VARC-3 criteria]

  12. Conduction disturbances and arrhythmias

    Time frame: at discharge 1 day, an average of 7days; 30-day; 1 year

    Conduction disturbances and arrhythmias according to VARC-3

  13. Technical success:

    Time frame: patient exit from procedure room,whichever came first,assessed up to 30 minutes

    • Freedom from mortality
    • Successful access, delivery of the device, and retrieval of the delivery system
    • Correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location
    • Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the devicea or to a major vascular or access-related, or cardiac structural complication
  14. Device success

    Time frame: 30-day

    • Technical success
    • Freedom from mortality
    • Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the devicea or to a major vascular or access-related or cardiac structural complication
    • Intended performance of the valvec (mean gradient <20 mmHg, peak velocity <3 m/s, Doppler velocity index >_0.25, and less than moderate aortic regurgitation)
  15. Myocardial infarction

    Time frame: at discharge 1 day, an average of 7days; 30-day; 1 year

    Myocardial infarction (VARC-3 criteria)

  16. Vascular and access-related complications

    Time frame: at discharge 1 day, an average of 7days; 30-day; 1 year

    Vascular and access-related complications (VARC-3 criteria)

  17. Cardiac structural complications

    Time frame: at discharge 1 day, an average of 7days; 30-day; 1 year

    Cardiac structural complications (VARC-3 criteria)

  18. Any adverse events

    Time frame: within 7 days

    Any adverse events

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Xijing Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Videodensitometric Angiographic Assessment of AR in the Cath-lab for Intraprocedural Guidance of TAVI in CHINA-A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Open-label, Multi-centre, Non-inferiority Trial

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Mar 24, 2025
Registry last updated
Mar 24, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.