Rijnstate
Arnhem, 6815AD, Netherlands
NCT Number: NCT04563169
The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of video consultation versus face-to-face consultation for patients with obstructive sleep apnea on patients' CPAP use (minutes/per night), self-efficacy, risk outcomes, outcome expectancies, experiences with technology and, patients' and nurses' satisfaction.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Arnhem, 6815AD, Netherlands
The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of video consultation versus face-to-face consultation for patients with obstructive sleep apnea on patients' CPAP use (minutes/per night), self-efficacy, risk outcomes, outcome expectancies, experiences with technology and, patients' and nurses' satisfaction.
This study is a non-blinded randomized controlled trial with an intervention group (video consultations) and a usual care group (face-to-face consultations), with assessements after 1, 2, 3, 4, 12 and 24 weeks.
Patients were recruited from a large teaching hospital (Rijnstate, hospital), and included from January 2, 2019 until June 26, 2019.In total, 140 patients were randomized, (1:1 allocation).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The first video consultation with a nurse was planned one week after start with CPAP. Three focus points were discussed during the consultations: 1) adherence (>6 hours per night); 2) rest AHI < 5 (or <10 if age >70), and 3) (improvements in) complaints. If these objectives were achieved after one week, a new consultation was planned three weeks later (four weeks after start). As long as these objectives were not achieved, video consultations were planned weekly (until after four weeks).
Time frame: Week 1 through week 4
Continuous Airway Pressure use (minutes/night), extracted from Encore Anywhere.
Time frame: Week 4 through week 12
Continuous Airway Pressure use (minutes/night), extracted from Encore Anywhere.
Time frame: Week 1 through week 4
CPAP use for at least 5 nights per week for at least 4 hours per night. Extracted from Encore Anywhere.
Time frame: Week 4 through week 24
CPAP use for at least 5 nights per week for at least 4 hours per night. Extracted from Encore Anywhere.
Time frame: Baseline
Self-Efficacy Measure for Sleep Apnea questionnaire. Items were rated with a 4 point scale, varying from 1 (not at all true) to 4 (very true).
Time frame: Week 4
Self-Efficacy Measure for Sleep Apnea questionnaire. Items were rated on a 4 point scale, varying from 1 (not at all true) to 4 (very true).
Time frame: Baseline
Assessed with Self-Efficacy Measure for Sleep Apnea questionnaire. Items were rated on a 4 point scale, varying from 1 (not at all true) to 4 (very true).
Time frame: Week 4
Self-Efficacy Measure for Sleep Apnea questionnaire. Items were rated on a 4 point scale, varying from 1 (not at all true) to 4 (very true).
Time frame: Baseline
Self-Efficacy Measure for Sleep Apnea questionnaire. Items were rated on a 4 point scale, varying from 1 (very low) to 4 (very high).
Time frame: Week 4
Assessed with Self-Efficacy Measure for Sleep Apnea questionnaire. Items were rated on a 4 point scale, varying from 1 (very low) to 4 (very high).
Time frame: Baseline
Questions based on constructs of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Items were rated on a 7 point scale, varying from 1 (totally disagree) to 7 (totally agree).
Time frame: Week 4
Questions based on constructs of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (intervention group only). Items were rated on a 7 point scale, varying from 1 (totally disagree) to 7 (totally agree).
Time frame: Week 4
Questionnaires were used to assess satisfaction about consultations, number of consultations, received information, satisfaction with video consultation (intervention group only) and suggestions for improvement of the use of video consultation (open ended question). Items were rated on a 5 point scale, varying from 1 (totally disagree) to 5 (totally agree). Overall satisfaction was rated on a scale varying from 1 (not satisfied) to 10 (very satisfied).
Time frame: After intervention completion, up to 8 months (after start).
Satisfaction with video consultation, benefits (eg, time and efficiency) and integration in work process. Items were rated on a 5 point scale, varying from 1 (totally disagree) to 5 (totally agree). Overall satisfaction was rated on a scale varying from 1 (not satisfied) to 10 (very satisfied). Suggestions for improvement were assessed using an open question
Time frame: Baseline
Female/male
Time frame: Baseline
Age (years)
Time frame: Baseline
Education
Time frame: Baseline
Living together wit a partner (yes/no).
Time frame: Baseline
Internet use (duration) varying from less than six months until more than 3 years.
Rijnstate Hospital
Other
Video Consultation as an Adequate Alternative to Face-to-face Consultations in CPAP Use for Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Randomized Controlled Trial.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05929079
Apnea, Body Weight
Anniston, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06146101
Apnea, Dyssomnias
Chula Vista, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07723417
Apnea, Dyssomnias
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04950894
Apnea, Apnea+Hypopnea
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details