Video-Assisted Surgery or Talc Pleurodesis in Treating Patients With Malignant Mesothelioma

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

• Compare the effectiveness of video-assisted thoracoscopic cytoreductive pleurectomy vs talc pleurodesis, in terms of 1-year survival, in patients with suspected or proven malignant mesothelioma.

Secondary

• Compare the control of pleural effusion in these patients.
• Compare procedure-related complications in these patients.
• Compare the symptoms and quality of life of these patients at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment.
• Compare the length of hospital stay for these patients.
• Compare the exercise tolerance of these patients at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment.
• Determine the cost to the health service, in terms of resources used for procedures, hospital bed usage, and cost of primary and secondary care over 12 months.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to risk (high vs low). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

• Arm I (video-assisted thoracoscopic [VAT] cytoreductive pleurectomy): Patients undergo VAT cytoreductive pleurectomy either at the time of biopsy or after confirmation of biopsy results.
• Arm II (talc pleurodesis): Patients undergo talc pleurodesis via an indwelling intercostal chest drain or via thoracoscopy either at the time of biopsy or after confirmation of biopsy results.

Quality of life, complications, and resource use are assessed at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

• Confirmed or suspected mesothelioma

• Any subtype allowed
• Pleural effusion must be present

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

• Clinically fit and suitable for video-assisted thoracoscopic cytoreductive pleurectomy
• Prior malignancy allowed provided it no longer requires treatment AND patient has a confirmed diagnosis of mesothelioma

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

• No prior attempted pleurodesis by any approach