Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT02061891

Very Early veRsus Deferred Invasive Evaluation Using Computerized Tomography in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes

The aim of this study is to evaluate if acute invasive coronary evaluation and treatment conducted within 12 hours of diagnosis improves clinical outcome compared to a deferred, subacute strategy in patients with unstable angina pectoris (UAP) / non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) Furthermore, in an observational design the potential clinical benefit of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to select patients for invasive investigation and treatment in the two treatment arms (acute vs deferred) is evaluated.

The following main hypothesis will be tested:

* Very early invasive coronary investigation improves clinical outcome in patients with UAP/NSTEMI-ACS * CCTA performed before invasive coronary investigation will improve clinical management of patients with UAP/NSTEMI-ACS

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Department of Cardiology and Radiology, Rigshospitalet, The Heart Center, Capital Region of Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen

Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark

About this study

MATERIAL Consecutive patients suspected of UAP/NSTEMI will be screened for participation in the study. Only patients deemed clinically suited for invasive coronary evaluation and treatment will be included. A total of 2500 patients will be included in the trial at Departments of Cardiology of Danish Hospitals.

METHODS If the patients accept participation in the trial a computerized 1:1 randomization for acute invasive coronary evaluation (Intervention group - within 12 hours from time of diagnosis) or for deferred invasive evaluation (Control group - no later than 72 hours from time of diagnosis). All included patients undergo CCTA prior to invasive coronary evaluation, except for patient with moderately reduced renal function (se below). The treating invasive cardiologist will remain blinded to observational CCTA data. Patients with endstage renal disease in dialysis may undergo CCTA. CCTA data recorded as part of the research protocol will not be made available for the treating physician.

SECONDARY EXCLUSION Based on post-hoc expert clinical evaluation patients not having UAP/NSTEMI-ACS (arrythmias, pulmonary oedema, missed STEMI, pneumonia, Pulmonary emboli) will be excluded from analysis of difference between outcome measures in treatment strategy groups.

STATISTICAL METHODS Patients with UAP/NSTEMI-ACS are based on previous studies expected to have an event rate of 15% within 1 year and 50% at 4 years of the primary combined endpoint: all cause mortality, non-fatal recurrent myocardial infarction, hospitalisation for refractory ischemia or heart failure. In order to demonstrate a reduction of 25% within 3 years 711 patients in each group are needed. The study is powered to detect a clinical relevant reduction in mortality or heart failure hospitalization with a total of 2500 patients.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Patients with clinical suspicion of of UAP/NSTEMI acute coronary syndrome deemed suitable for invasive evaluation and treatment will be included in the study.

  • Age> 18 years
  • At least one of the following:
  • ECG abnormalities suggestive of myocardial ischemia (newly developed ST segment depression, horizontal or descending >= 0,05mV in two anatomically adjacent leads and/or T-wave inversion >0,01 mV in two leads with prominent R wave or R/S ratio >1
  • Elevated myocardial ischemia biomarkers (Troponin, CK-MB)

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnancy
  • Circumstances preventing the patient from reading and/or understanding the research protocol information
  • Clinical indication for acute invasive coronary angiography - severe chest pain despite intravenous nitroglycerin infusion or hemodynamic instability
  • Expected survival of less than 1 year
  • Known allergy/hypersensitivity of pharmacological platelet inhibitors and/or iodine contrast that cannot be prevented medically

Patients with known eGFR below 60 ml/min will not undergo CCTA, whereas patients in dialysis will undergo the entire study protocol

Treatment and study plan

Invasive coronary evaluation (Deferred)

Procedure

Invasive coronary angiography and revascularization (PCI/CABG)

Invasive coronary evaluation (Acute)

Procedure

Invasive coronary angiography and revascularization (PCI/CABG)

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite clinical endpoint

    Time frame: 3 years

    Composite endpoint of all cause mortality, non-fatal recurrent acute myocardial infarction, hospitalisation for refractory ischemia (acute coronary syndrome) or heart failure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Bleeding

    Time frame: During index hospitalization - an expected average of 5 days

    Major and minor bleeding according to TIMI and BARC classification systems

  2. Non-bleeding, invasive procedure related complications

    Time frame: During index hospitalization - an expected average of 5 days

    Invasive procedure related acute myocardial infarction, embolic stroke, cardiac arrest

  3. Death

    Time frame: 3 and 5 years

    All-cause death

  4. Non-fatal acute myocardial infarction

    Time frame: 3 and 5 years

  5. Hospital admittance due to refractory myocardial ischemia (acute coronary syndrome)

    Time frame: 3 and 5 years

  6. Repeat coronary revascularization

    Time frame: 3 and 5 years

    Recorded from 30 days post-index procedure

  7. Hospital admittance due to left ventricular heart failure

    Time frame: 3 and 5 years

  8. GRACE Risk Score

    Time frame: 3 and 5 years

    All primary and secondary endpoints stratified by GRACE score at a threshold of 140

Other outcomes

  1. CCTA diagnostic accuracy

    Time frame: Within 30 days after performed CCTA and ICA

    Determinants of diagnostic accuracy of CCTA for the identification of >50% and >70% coronary artery stenosis by invasive coronary angiography in both treatment strategy groups

  2. CCTA guided treatment strategy

    Time frame: Within 30 days after performed CCTA and ICA

    Prediction of clinical treatment strategy based on CCTA - and the potential value of CCTA guided triage in terms of optimized patient management. Evaluation will be performed blinded to ICA findings.

  3. CCTA prediction of clinical outcome

    Time frame: 3 and 5 years

    Clinical prognostic value of coronary pathology, cardiac and non-cardiac pathology identified by CCTA

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Other

Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen

Registry information

Official study title

Entire Danish Initiative To ImrpOve Revascularization Strategies (EDITORS) - A Randomised Evaluation of Clinical Outcome After Acute or Deferred Invasive Intervention Integrated With MDCT Imaging in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes

Acronym: VERDICT-EDI

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2030
First posted
Feb 13, 2014
Registry last updated
Dec 12, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.