Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06024785

Vertebropexy - Randomized-controlled Trial

To assess the need for additional fusion surgery versus the risk of a revision surgery in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal disease and to assess efficacy and risk of the ligamentous fixation technique (vertebropexy)

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Balgrist University Hospital

Zurich, Canton of Zurich, 8008, Switzerland

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Mazda Farshad, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+413861111

About this study

The global share of people over the age of 65 years has been consistently on the rise over the past few decades, and is still projected to increase. The increasing life expectancy, overall advances in medical care and therefore, the higher average age of people seeking surgical treatment lead to increasing numbers of spine surgeries: Spinal fusion is one of the most frequently used surgical treatment modalities for spinal disorders with 7.6 million per year worldwide (EU: 700,000, USA: 450,000, CH: 9000) and provides stability by internal rigid fixation of the spine with screws, rods and bony fusion. Although producing reliable short-term results with rapid pain relief and positive effects on patient outcome, implant-related complications, painful pseudarthrosis (non-union of bone), screw loosening, and adjacent segment disease lead to one-third of patients requiring reoperation within 15 years. These complications might be evoked by altered biomechanics with redistribution of loads and subsequently increased stress at the bone-implant interface as well as long fusions leading to relevant, irreversible loss of motion. Therefore, a new treatment modality which reinforces bony spinal segments with ligaments, the so called "vertebropexy", was recently developed by Farshad et al. The goal is to achieve targeted stabilization of the spine by inserting ligamentous allografts to counteract instability, without immobilizing the segment. Furthermore, it might provide additional stabilization after decompression surgery and therefore reduce revision surgery rates due to instability in clinically relevant directions as flexion-extension or anterior shear stress. However, to become a broadly accepted surgical alternative to existing surgical techniques for degenerative lumbar spinal disease like dorsal fusion and spinal decompression surgery, the new technique must provide convincing long-term results superior to those of these established procedures which is the primary objective of this randomized controlled trial.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Single-level or two-level lumbar surgery needed
  • Indication for decompression surgery in patients with spinal canal stenosis and additional stable degenerative listhesis (without facet joint effusion ≥ 2mm)
  • Indication for fusion surgery in patients with spinal canal stenosis and additional unstable degenerative listhesis (facet joint effusion ≥ 2mm), in patients with foraminal stenosis and additional degenerative listhesis, and in patients with segment degeneration of the disc
  • Understanding in German language

Exclusion criteria

  • Indication for decompression and/or fusion surgery in patients with solely disc herniation, fractures, lytic listhesis, tumor
  • Patients undergoing revision surgery for infection
  • Patients undergoing revision surgery on the same level if bony structures have been removed (e.g. prior laminectomy or midline decompression)
  • Patients undergoing revision surgery in case of prior fusion surgery
  • Inability to understand the study for linguistic or cognitive reasons
  • Anticipated clinical follow-up of less than 6 weeks after inclusion
  • Participation in other clinical trials

Treatment and study plan

Vertebropexy

Procedure

microsurgical (i.e., the use of a microscope or magnifying glasses during decompression) lumbar laminotomy with partial removal of the medial facet joint by preserving the midline structures (supraspinous-interspinous ligament complex); approach: bilateral or ipsilateral with cross-over to the contralateral side. Additional stabilization of the spine with a ligament (for instance semitendinosus donor allograft), which connect the postoprior structures (Proc. Spinosus and/or Lamina) of the vertebrae . Situation-related application of laminar bands or analogous suture material (for instance FiberTape, Arthrex, Naples or Nile Band, K2M, Virginia)

Other names: ligamentous fixation of the spine

Primary outcomes

  1. ODI (Oswestry Disability Index)

    Time frame: 2 years postoperative

    To assess and compare the clinical outcome of patients with spinal canal stenosis or foraminal stenosis +/- degenerative listhesis with either vertebropexy, decompression or fusion surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. VAS (Visual Analogue Scale)

    Time frame: 2 years postoperative

    To assess and compare the clinical outcome of patients with spinal canal stenosis or foraminal stenosis +/- degenerative listhesis with either vertebropexy, decompression or fusion surgery. VAS scale 0-10, 10 meaning the highest pain score and 0 no pain at all.

  2. SSM symptoms/function (Spinal Stenosis Measure)

    Time frame: 2 years postoperative

    To assess and compare the clinical outcome of patients with spinal canal stenosis or foraminal stenosis +/- degenerative listhesis with either vertebropexy, decompression or fusion surgery

  3. SSM satisfaction (Spinal Stenosis Measure)

    Time frame: 2 years postoperative

    To assess and compare the clinical outcome of patients with spinal canal stenosis or foraminal stenosis +/- degenerative listhesis with either vertebropexy, decompression or fusion surgery

  4. EQ-5D (European Quality of Life Five Dimension)

    Time frame: 2 years postoperative

    To assess and compare the clinical outcome of patients with spinal canal stenosis or foraminal stenosis +/- degenerative listhesis with either vertebropexy, decompression or fusion surgery

  5. Revision surgery

    Time frame: 2 years postoperative

    surgery on same and/or on adjacent levels

  6. Complications

    Time frame: 2 years postoperative

    • - intraoperative: lesion of nerve root, dural tear, lesion of vessels
    • - postoperative: surgical site infection, wound healing disorder, hematoma, paresis, material loosening (with fusion), material failure (with fusion), pseudarthrosis (with fusion), fracture, allograft tendon rupture (with vertebropexy)
    • - non-surgical: anesthesiological, cardiovascular, pulmonal, thromboembolic, death
  7. Duration of surgery

    Time frame: Perioperative

    Duration of intervention in minutes

  8. Length of hospital stay

    Time frame: Perioperative

    Duration of hospital stay in days

  9. Intraoperative blood loss

    Time frame: Perioperative

    Blood loss intraoperative in ml

  10. Use of analgesia

    Time frame: 2 years postoperative

    Intake of analgetics

  11. Use of physical therapy

    Time frame: 2 years postoperative

    Necessity to undergo further physical therapy (for instance due to remaining pain or function deficit)

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Mazda Farshad, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+413861111

Sabrina Catanzaro, RN

CONTACT

[email protected]

+413861111

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Balgrist University Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Ligamentous Fixation Technique (Vertebropexy) Versus Conventional Decompression or Fusion Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Acronym: VPRCT

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Sep 6, 2023
Registry last updated
Jul 28, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.