Balgrist University Hospital
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, 8008, Switzerland
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06024785
To assess the need for additional fusion surgery versus the risk of a revision surgery in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal disease and to assess efficacy and risk of the ligamentous fixation technique (vertebropexy)
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, 8008, Switzerland
Location status: Recruiting
The global share of people over the age of 65 years has been consistently on the rise over the past few decades, and is still projected to increase. The increasing life expectancy, overall advances in medical care and therefore, the higher average age of people seeking surgical treatment lead to increasing numbers of spine surgeries: Spinal fusion is one of the most frequently used surgical treatment modalities for spinal disorders with 7.6 million per year worldwide (EU: 700,000, USA: 450,000, CH: 9000) and provides stability by internal rigid fixation of the spine with screws, rods and bony fusion. Although producing reliable short-term results with rapid pain relief and positive effects on patient outcome, implant-related complications, painful pseudarthrosis (non-union of bone), screw loosening, and adjacent segment disease lead to one-third of patients requiring reoperation within 15 years. These complications might be evoked by altered biomechanics with redistribution of loads and subsequently increased stress at the bone-implant interface as well as long fusions leading to relevant, irreversible loss of motion. Therefore, a new treatment modality which reinforces bony spinal segments with ligaments, the so called "vertebropexy", was recently developed by Farshad et al. The goal is to achieve targeted stabilization of the spine by inserting ligamentous allografts to counteract instability, without immobilizing the segment. Furthermore, it might provide additional stabilization after decompression surgery and therefore reduce revision surgery rates due to instability in clinically relevant directions as flexion-extension or anterior shear stress. However, to become a broadly accepted surgical alternative to existing surgical techniques for degenerative lumbar spinal disease like dorsal fusion and spinal decompression surgery, the new technique must provide convincing long-term results superior to those of these established procedures which is the primary objective of this randomized controlled trial.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
microsurgical (i.e., the use of a microscope or magnifying glasses during decompression) lumbar laminotomy with partial removal of the medial facet joint by preserving the midline structures (supraspinous-interspinous ligament complex); approach: bilateral or ipsilateral with cross-over to the contralateral side. Additional stabilization of the spine with a ligament (for instance semitendinosus donor allograft), which connect the postoprior structures (Proc. Spinosus and/or Lamina) of the vertebrae . Situation-related application of laminar bands or analogous suture material (for instance FiberTape, Arthrex, Naples or Nile Band, K2M, Virginia)
Other names: ligamentous fixation of the spine
Time frame: 2 years postoperative
To assess and compare the clinical outcome of patients with spinal canal stenosis or foraminal stenosis +/- degenerative listhesis with either vertebropexy, decompression or fusion surgery
Time frame: 2 years postoperative
To assess and compare the clinical outcome of patients with spinal canal stenosis or foraminal stenosis +/- degenerative listhesis with either vertebropexy, decompression or fusion surgery. VAS scale 0-10, 10 meaning the highest pain score and 0 no pain at all.
Time frame: 2 years postoperative
To assess and compare the clinical outcome of patients with spinal canal stenosis or foraminal stenosis +/- degenerative listhesis with either vertebropexy, decompression or fusion surgery
Time frame: 2 years postoperative
To assess and compare the clinical outcome of patients with spinal canal stenosis or foraminal stenosis +/- degenerative listhesis with either vertebropexy, decompression or fusion surgery
Time frame: 2 years postoperative
To assess and compare the clinical outcome of patients with spinal canal stenosis or foraminal stenosis +/- degenerative listhesis with either vertebropexy, decompression or fusion surgery
Time frame: 2 years postoperative
surgery on same and/or on adjacent levels
Time frame: 2 years postoperative
Time frame: Perioperative
Duration of intervention in minutes
Time frame: Perioperative
Duration of hospital stay in days
Time frame: Perioperative
Blood loss intraoperative in ml
Time frame: 2 years postoperative
Intake of analgetics
Time frame: 2 years postoperative
Necessity to undergo further physical therapy (for instance due to remaining pain or function deficit)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Mazda Farshad, MD
CONTACT
Sabrina Catanzaro, RN
CONTACT
Balgrist University Hospital
Other
Comparison of Ligamentous Fixation Technique (Vertebropexy) Versus Conventional Decompression or Fusion Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Acronym: VPRCT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05343897
Behavior, Degeneration
Tainan, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT00555659
Bone Diseases, Constriction, Pathologic
Columbia, Missouri, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06438471
Bone Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Augusta, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06120231
Bone Diseases, Musculoskeletal Diseases
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
View Trial Details