Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, 10029, United States
NCT Number: NCT06056557
The purpose of this pragmatic study is to evaluate the safety, performance and effectiveness of the VARIPULSE catheter technology used in combination with the TRUPULSE™ Generator, and the compatible EAM system (Carto 3D) to treat patients with atrial fibrillation and related arrhythmias during clinically-indicated ablation procedures.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
New York, 10029, United States
By virtue of its efficiency, safety profile, and potential for improved efficacy in certain patient populations (e.g., thickened atrial tissue of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients), there is tremendous excitement about the role of pulsed field ablation (PFA) to treat atrial fibrillation and related arrhythmias. However, most PFA clinical trials enroll very selected populations and have highly focused inclusion/exclusion criteria - for example, typically only paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with upper age criteria are included, other disease states such as HCM are excluded, and typically redo ablation procedures are also excluded. The latter is particularly problematic since redo procedures are quite prevalent in most physicians' clinical practice.
In some sense, the incorporation of these restrictive criteria is not terribly surprising since most of the novel PFA catheters are specifically designed to perform only certain aspects of the AF ablation procedure (e.g., just PVI). That is, when there are more complex substrates (where other types of lesion sets may be needed), it may not be practical to allow a more inclusive criteria for enrollment. Of course, the downside is that the majority of the patients that are eventually treated in clinical practice are not reflected by the enrolled patient population.
The VARIPULSE™ catheter technology is a novel circular catheter with a variable loop design, containing multiple electrodes with individual irrigation pores capable of delivering pulse-field energy.
The Ablation procedure will follow the below sequence:
This study is a prospective, single-center, non-randomized, interventional clinical study to determine the safety and efficacy in using BWI IRE ablation system in a variety of atrial arrhythmias. Subjects will be followed for 12 months post-procedure.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Subjects will arrive to the electrophysiology laboratory for their ablation procedure and will undergo preparation for the procedure per standard protocol.
The purpose of an ablation procedure is to scar or destroy the heart tissue causing the atrial fibrillation. The current FDA approved ablation treatments commonly use freezing, radio frequency, or laser, delivered through a catheter that is threaded through blood vessels to the heart, as the energy source to destroy the abnormal tissue.
The BWI IRE VARIPULSE ablation system used in this study uses a type of energy source called pulse field.
Pulse field ablation applies ultra-rapid (less than 1 second) electrical fields to the heart muscle to destroy the abnormal tissue. This type of energy is thought to safer and more effective at treating atrial fibrillation.
● For a lesion set that cannot be performed using the VARIPULSE catheter technology, a conventional FDA-approved RF ablation
Time frame: up to 12 months post-procedure
Acute procedural success is defined according to the type of arrhythmia, for example:
Time frame: up to 12 months post-procedure
Percentage of time spent in atrial flutter/fibrillation/tachycardia as noted on CIED interrogation.
Time frame: after 3-month blanking period until end of 12 months of follow-up
The percentage of patients with no evidence of atrial fibrillation/flutter or tachycardia of more than 30 seconds of duration as noted by implantable device after the 3-month blanking period until the end of 12 months of follow-up
Time frame: after 3-month blanking period until end of 12 months of follow-up
The percentage of patients presenting with persistent atrial fibrillation with no evidence of atrial fibrillation/flutter or tachycardia of more than 30 seconds of duration as noted by implantable device after the 3-month blanking period until the end of 12 months of follow up in patients not taking anti-arrhythmic medications
Time frame: after 3-month blanking period until end of 12 months of follow-up
The percentage of patients who do not report recurrent of symptomatic arrhythmias as noted during telephone or office follow up after the 3-month blanking period until the end of 12 months of follow up
Time frame: after 3-month blanking period until end of 12 months of follow-up
The percentage of patients with no evidence of atrial fibrillation/flutter or tachycardia of more than 30 seconds of duration as noted by implantable device after the 3-month blanking period until the end of 12 months of follow up in patients who are taking anti-arrhythmic medications
Time frame: after 3-month blanking period until end of 12 months of follow-up
The percentage of patients with no evidence of atrial fibrillation/flutter or tachycardia of more than 30 seconds of duration as noted by implantable device after the 3-month blanking period until the end of 12 months of follow up in patients who not taking anti-arrhythmic medications
Time frame: up to 12 months post-procedure
Durability of lesion sets in any patient that undergoes a second procedure (Block across attempted lines, absence of electrograms in targeted substrate) as measured with 3-d electroanatomic map to assess bidirectional block across ablation lines.
Time frame: up to 12 months post-procedure
Number of patient emergency room (ER) visits
Time frame: up to 12 months post-procedure
Number of patient Hospitalizations
Time frame: up to 12 months post-procedure
Measured by the actual occurrence of cardioversion procedures
Time frame: up to 12 months post-procedure
Number of patients who experience repeat ablation
Vivek Reddy
Other
Acronym: VIRTUE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06249269
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06557616
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Bydgoszcz, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT05883631
Arrhythmia, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06836999
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Hefei, Anhui, China
View Trial Details