Tampa General Hospital
Tampa, Florida, 33606, United States
NCT Number: NCT02896036
Purpose: The primary objective is to compare the time required for adequate intraperitoneal insufflation (from skin incision to reaching intraperitoneal pressure of 15 mmHg). Also the number of attempts needed before successful entry is achieved. The secondary objectives will evaluate rates of secondary outcomes measures such as; failed entry, extra peritoneal insufflation, vascular injury, visceral injury, gas embolism, solid organ injury, and omental injury between the two techniques.
Study design: prospective randomized control trial
Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that participant's undergoing laparoscopic surgery for benign Gynecologic indications at TGH who undergo laparoscopic entry technique of Veress needle entry with concomitant CO2 insufflation will require less time to achieve a 15 mmHg of intraperitoneal pressure as opposed to Veress needle entry with subsequent CO2 insufflation, and will require less number of attempts to achieve successful entry.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–70 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Tampa, Florida, 33606, United States
Subject Recruitment and Consent:
All female patients age 18-70 scheduled for benign gynecologic laparoscopic surgery at TGH by a participating attending surgeon will be recruited. Each participant will be educated about the study; its objectives, potential benefits and risks, and the research team will obtain informed consent. Plan to enroll 90 participants.
Materials and Methods:
This will be a randomized control trial in which participants will be randomly assigned to have laparoscopic entry with Veress needle connected to CO2 tubing for concomitant insufflation versus Veress needle entry with subsequent connection to CO2 tubing for insufflation. The investigators will inform the patients about the two entry techniques during the pre-operative office visit. Participants will be consented to participate in the study prior to the surgery by the study research coordinators during their pre-operative visit. Patients who do not consent for the study will still undergo the scheduled procedure with standard entry technique as clinically indicated by their provider. Randomization will occur in the operating room just before the surgery starts. The healthcare provider performing the procedure will open the next sequentially numbered envelope, within which there will be a piece of paper indicating the entry technique to be performed. This will then be recorded in the study log. The study log will include enrolled participants, assigned study number which will range from 001 to the minimum number of participants required for the study as indicated by sample size calculation (see below). The participant will be positioned in the dorsal lithotomy position and prepped and draped in the standard fashion. Preoperative antibiotics will be provided as per standard indication for the procedure. For the group of participants who will be randomized to concomitant CO2 insufflation; the Veress will be connected to the CO2 tubing, and a skin incision will be made with the scalpel, followed by starting the CO2 gas insufflation and insertion of the Veress needle. If the opening pressure is less than or equal to 10 mmHg, the process of insufflation will be allowed to continue. In case of a higher opening pressure, the Veress will be withdrawn and reinserted up to 3 times. A failed entry will be called if the peritoneal cavity cannot be insufflated after 3 attempts. For the other group of patients who will be randomized to subsequent CO2 insufflation; the Veress needle will be connected to the CO2 tubing, and a skin incision will be made with the scalpel, followed by insertion of the Veress needle. The gas insufflation will be started and the opening pressure will be noted. If the opening pressure is less than or equal to 10 mmHg, the process of insufflation will be allowed to continue. In case of a higher opening pressure, the Veress needle will be withdrawn and reinserted up to 3 times. Each time the needle is to reinserted, the CO2 insufflator will be switched off until the location of the Veress needle is felt to be adequate. The time will be recorded from incision to the time it takes to achieve intraperitoneal pressure of 15 mmHg. In addition to the above primary and secondary outcomes of the study, participant demographic information, procedure specific variables and outcomes will be collected and recorded in the study log (See data collection sheet). Common laparoscopic complications will also be recorded, including the following:
Sample size: 90 patients will be recruited based on the sample size calculations already performed.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The Veress will be connected to the CO2 tubing, and a skin incision will be made with the scalpel, followed by starting the CO2 gas insufflation and insertion of the Veress needle.
A skin incision will be made with the scalpel. The Veress needle will be inserted until intraperitoneal location obtained. This will be followed by starting CO2 gas insufflation until the standard 15 mmHg.
Time frame: intraoperative
Time from insertion of Veress to insufflation of peritoneum to 15 mmHg.
Time frame: intraoperative
Evaluate occurrence of failed entry (more than 3 attempts with the Veress without intraperitoneal insufflation)
Time frame: intraoperative
Time frame: intraoperative
Time frame: intraoperative
Time frame: intraoperative
omental injury between the two techniques
Time frame: intraoperative
Time frame: intraoperative
Time frame: intraoperative
Record the number of attempts taken with Veress needle to obtain successful intraperitoneal entry.
University of South Florida
Other
Laparoscopic Entry Technique With a Veress Needle Insertion With and Without Concomitant CO2 Insufflation - Does it Matter?
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07026162
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Laparoscopy
Changsha, Hunan, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06137976
Aspiration, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04744688
Abdominal Neoplasms, Bleeding
Aarhus, Aarhus N, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT04142203
Adnexal Diseases, Ambulatory Surgery
Kuopio, Northern Savonia, Finland
View Trial Details