Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05189158

Ventilatory Responses to Hypercapnic and Hypoxic Conditions in Hyperventilants

For almost a century, many hypotheses have converged on the idea of altered chemosensitivity in patients suffering from hyperventilation syndrome (HVS).

Given the evolution of current technical equipment and the ability to maximise true positives in HVS ( using the revised hyperventilation provocation test), it seems reasonable to investigate central and peripheral chemosensitivities in HVS subjects.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–99 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

CHU St Pierre

Brussels, Brabant, 1000, Belgium

About this study

In the inter-war period, many medical investigators who studied the hyperventilation syndrome (HVS) had already questioned the chemosensitivity to CO2 in HVS patients, without being able to explore it for all intents and purposes.

It was subsequently observed that although HVS is not systematically linked to manifest resting hypocapnia, it is nevertheless systematically correlated with significant variability and complexity of ventilation.

This is consistent with the observations of an increased plant gain in HVS, to be related to an increased loop gain (due to instability of controller gain feedback).

On the other hand, some authors already noted that, when capnia is chronically compromised in HVS, it can be greatly altered by small, transient and barely perceptible increases in VE: a 10% increase in VE could indeed halve PetCO2, while a sigh would be able to decrease PetCO2 by up to 15mmHg.

More recently, teh assumption was made that peripheral chemosensitivity may be impaired in HVS patients.

For all these considerations, it seems reasonable to investigate central and peripheral chemosensitivities in identified HVS subjects on the basis of an objective test, such as the induced hyperventilation test.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • A plethysmography within subject's predicted values
  • A negative metacholine test (no documented allergy)
  • A hyperventilation provocation test result that is consistent with the Nijmegen questionnaire score, confirming either group classification (HVS+ or HVS-)

Exclusion criteria

  • Each of the following known or documented conditions: chronic bronchitis (COPD), emphysema, asthma, cardiac disorder, neurological disorder, gastrointestinal disorder, thyroid disorder or psychological/psychiatric disorder
  • Suspicious cardio-pulmonary exercise testing (CPET) with cardiac or respiratory limitation
  • Pregnant women or women in the process of becoming pregnant
  • Persons with a diving practice (amateur or professional),
  • High-level athletes,
  • Active smokers and
  • persons using morphine, and/or barbiturates, and/or anxiolytics and/or sleeping pills

Treatment and study plan

Hypercapnic hyperoxic ventilatory response

Diagnostic Test

The hypercapnic ventilatory response (HCVR) described by Read in 1967 (Read's rebreathing method) is a clinical way to assess the central and peripheric sensitivity to CO2, using a small bag (4-6 l) to achieve prompt equilibrium between the apparatus compartments and the lungs.

By rebreathing a hyperoxic mixture with an initial composition of 70% O2, 7% CO2 and 23% N2, this equilibrium is assumed to be achieved after 15 seconds of rebreathing, when the relationship between VE and PetCO2 has become linear.

Hypoxic eucapnic ventilatory response

Diagnostic Test

The hypoxic eucapnic ventilatory response (HOVR) is a clinical way to assess the peripheric chemosensitivity to O2, using a small bag (4-6 l) to rebreathe a gas mixture initially composed of 20% O2, 0% CO2 and Δ% N2. Eucapnia is achieved by the activation of a CO2 reabsorption cell during the course of the test.

Primary outcomes

  1. The slope of the ventilatory response to hypercapnia (HCVR)

    Time frame: baseline - during the test

    Ventilation increase (litres/min) per unit increase in PetCO2 (mmHg) using Read's method

  2. The slope of the ventilatory response to hypoxia (HOVR)

    Time frame: baseline - during the test

    Ventilation increase (litres/min) per unit decrease in SpO2 (%) using Read's method

  3. Ventilatory recruitment threshold (VRT) of the HCVR

    Time frame: baseline - during the test

    From the average baseline ventilation and PetCO2, the VRT id the PetCO2 level at which the ventilatory response is activated

  4. Ventilatory recruitment threshold (VRT) of the HOVR

    Time frame: baseline - during the test

    From the average baseline ventilation and SpO2, the VRT is the level of SpO2 at which the ventilatory response is activated

Secondary outcomes

  1. Extrapolated apnoeic threshold of the HCVR

    Time frame: baseline - during the test

    PetCO2 level above which apnoea (zero ventilation) is disrupted, obtained from the extrapolation of the HCVR at the X-axis intersection (when VE=0 l/min)

  2. Dyspnea

    Time frame: baseline, end of the test

    Visual analogic scale (VAS) of dyspnea, from 0 (no dyspnea) to 10 (maximal dyspnea)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre

Other

Collaborators

  • Université Libre de Bruxelles

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Jan 12, 2022
Registry last updated
Jan 12, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.