deploying vascular closure device versus manual compression
Procedurepatients will be randomized to either group 1 or group 2 in a 1:1 ratio:
NCT Number: NCT05563142
Prospective, randomized, controlled, multi-center study to compare the safety and efficacy of the Perclose ProStyle suture-mediated closure device (PPS) as to manual compression (MC) for venous hemostasis following single shot device (SSD) based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Herz- und Diabeteszentrum Nordrhein-Westfalen, Bad Oeynhausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
The aim of this study is to show that the time to ambulation after PVI can be reduced by deploying vascular closure device versus manual compression and a figure-of-8 suture only. Safety, efficacy and feasibility of the PPS device should be proven, too.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
patients will be randomized to either group 1 or group 2 in a 1:1 ratio:
Time frame: 6 hours
elapsed time between removal of the final closure device or removal of the final sheath and when the patient can stand and walk 20 ft without evidence of venous re-bleeding from the femoral access site.
Time frame: 6 hours
elapsed time between removal of the last procedural device for the index procedure and when the patient was able to successfully ambulate
Time frame: 6 hours
elapsed time between removal of the closure device or the sheath and first observed and confirmed venous hemostasis, for each access site
Time frame: 3 days
elapsed time between removal of the final closure device or final sheath and when the patient was eligible for hospital discharge based solely on the assessment of the access site, as determined by the medical team
Time frame: 3 days
elapsed time between removal of the final closure device or final sheath and when the patient was discharged from the institution
Time frame: 6 hours
elapsed time between removal of the last procedural device for the index procedure and removal of the first closure device or first sheath
Time frame: 30 days
Incidence of major adverse events within 30 days after the procedure
Time frame: 30 days
Incidence of minor adverse events within 30 days after the procedure
Time frame: 3 days
Attainment of final hemostasis at all venous access sites and freedom from major venous access site closure-related complications
University of Luebeck
Other
Venous Vascular Closure System Versus Manual Compression Following Single Shot Device AF Ablation - the Style-AF Study
Acronym: Style-AF
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05820295
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05993897
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Aswān, Aswan Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05357690
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05164718
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Drammen, Norway
View Trial Details