Halland Hospital Halmstad
Halmstad, Halland County, 30582, Sweden
NCT Number: NCT04751812
The investigators have recently shown that pain associated with peripheral venous cannulation can be used to predict the risk of postoperative pain, where patients grading their pain associated with venous cannulation (VCP) above 2.0 VAS units had 3.4 times higher risk of moderate or severe postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 1.7 times higher risk in a mixed group of patients and surgeries.
The aim of this study is to investigate whether pain sensitivity measurements using VCP can be used to choose anesthesia treatment protocol with the aim to lower acute postoperative pain in those with high risk. In patients with low risk we aim to lower the amount of opioids given.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Halmstad, Halland County, 30582, Sweden
The investigators will perform a randomized controlled trial randomizing patients to different treatment protocols depending on their pain associated with venous cannulation. There will be two set of instructions for perioperative treatment, one for those grading pain associated with venous cannulation <2.0 (low-pain) and another for those grading VCP ≥2.0 (high-pain).
The low-pain group will be randomized to standard treatment or opioid-free anesthesia. The high-pain group will be randomized to standard treatment or extra in form of additives like esketamine and clonidine.
In the low-pain group the investigators aim for non-inferiority with the gain being avoiding opioids. In the high-pain group the investigators aim for lower post-operative pain.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Paracetamol, Etoricoxib, Oxycodone, Ondansetron po. Betamethasone 4 mg iv.
Anesthesia:
As "standard" + bolus esketamine 0.25 mg/kg iv + Clonidine 1 µg/kg i.v.
Postoperative pain treatment:
At pain NRS ≥ 4 - 5 mg of oxycodone i.v. Paracetamol will be administered every 6 hours. If above is not sufficient bolus Clonidine 1 µg/kg i.v.
Other names: More extensive pain treatment
Paracetamol, Etoricoxib, Ondansetron p.o. Betamethasone 4 mg iv.
Anesthesia:
Infusion Dexmedetomidin 0.2 mikrogram/kg/h iv started 5 min before induction Induction: Esketamin 0.1mg/kg + Propofol 1.5-2 mg/kg iv + rocuronium 0.5 mg/kg iv Start of surgery: Esketamin 0.1 mg/kg iv. Maintenance of anesthesia: Sevoflurane Dexmedetomidin inf 0.2 mikrogram/kg/h Esketamin inf 0.1-0.3mg/kg/h and 0.1 mg/kg adjusted after BP and HR 30 min before end of surgery Lidocaine 1 mg/kg iv
Postoperative pain treatment:
If pain NRS ≧3 Esketamin 0.1mg/kg iv + Lidocain 0.5 mg/kg iv (max 4 mg/kg /4 h) If pain NRS ≧3 within 30 min after treatment above is given with Esketamin + Lidocain, 2.5 mg Oxycodone iv. is given and may be repeated.
Other names: Opioid free anesthesia
Paracetamol, Etoricoxib, Oxycodone, Ondansetron p.o. Betamethasone 4 mg iv.
Anesthesia:
Target controlled infusion (TCI) with doses of propofol and remifentanil based on age, weight and height. Oxycodone 0.1 mg/kg 30 minutes before cessation of remifentanil.
Postoperative care:
At pain NRS ≥ 4 - 5 mg of oxycodone i.v. Paracetamol will be administered every 6 hours. If above is not sufficient bolus Clonidine 1 µg/kg i.v.
Time frame: Acute, within 1.5 hours after surgery
Difference in mean APOP between groups (Opioid free vs Standard of care, Multimodal vs Standard of care). Reported as difference in NRS (numeric rating scale; 0-10 with 0 describing no pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable) with confidence interval (CI).
Time frame: Acute, 24 hours and 3 months after surgery
Reported as difference in NRS (numeric rating scale; 0-10 with 0 describing no pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable) with confidence interval (CI).
Time frame: Preoperative measurement
Correlation between values on the pain catastrophizing scale and venous cannulation pain measured on a visual analog scale (0.0-10.0 with 0.0 describing no pain and 10.0 the worst pain imaginable)
Time frame: Acute, within 24 hours after surgery
Correlation between values on the pain catastrophizing scale and postoperative pain measured on a numeric rating scale (0-10 with 0 describing no pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable)
Time frame: At 3 months after surgery
Correlation between values on the pain catastrophizing scale and postoperative pain measured on a numeric rating scale (0-10 with 0 describing no pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable)
Time frame: At three months after surgery
Difference in occurence of persistent postoperative pain (assessed via a questionnaire as ocurring or not) comparing the pain sensitive group (VCP >2.0) and pain tolerant group (VCP<2.0).
Time frame: Three months after surgery.
Difference in mean PPOP between groups (Opioid free vs Standard of care, Multimodal vs Standard of care). Reported as difference in NRS (numeric rating scale; 0-10 with 0 describing no pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable) with confidence interval (CI).
Multimodal vs Standard of care). Reported as difference in NRS with confidence interval (CI).
Time frame: Acute; within 24 hours
Difference in mean APOP between pain-sensitive and pain-tolerant groups (SOC VCP≥2,0 vs SOC VCP≤1,9). Reported as difference in NRS (numeric rating scale; 0-10 with 0 describing no pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable) with confidence interval (CI).
Time frame: Three months after surgery
Difference in ocurrence of PPOP between pain-sensitive and pain-tolerant groups (SOC VCP≥2,0 vs SOC VCP≤1,9). Reported as difference in NRS (numeric rating scale; 0-10 with 0 describing no pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable) with confidence interval (CI).
Time frame: Acute; within 24 hours
Difference in Quality of recovery (QoR) after 24 hr between groups (OFA vs SOC, MAO vs SOC)? QoR assessed with the QoR-15 validated questionnaire answered by the patient 24 hours post surgery.
Time frame: Acute; within 24 hours
Difference in proportion of patients experiencing moderate to severe APOP (NRS ≥ 4.0) between pain-sensitive and pain-tolerant groups (SOC VCP≥2,0 vs SOC VCP≤1,9)
Region Halland
Other
The Use of Venous Cannulation Pain for Evaluation of Pain Sensitivity in an Attempt to Guide Pain Therapy During and Following Anesthesia
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05283980
Acute Pain, Behavior
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05859061
Neurologic Manifestations, Pain
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06791577
Blood Coagulation Disorders, Bruising
São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT03090776
Neurologic Manifestations, Pain
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details