Cytarabine
DrugIntravenous infusion
Other names: Ara-C, Arabinosylcytosine
NCT Number: NCT04801797
This research is being done to assess the therapeutic activity of a promising combination (azacitidine and venetoclax) versus conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy in induction-eligible patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
This study involves the following:
* Venetoclax and azacitidine (investigational combination) * Cytarabine and idarubicin or daunorubicin (per standard of care) or Liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine (per standard of care)
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
City of Hope, Duarte, California, United States
This is an open-label, multicenter, phase II randomized clinical trial to compare the therapeutic activity of conventional induction chemotherapy (7+3 regimen or liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine) to the combination of venetoclax and azacitidine among fit, traditionally induction-eligible adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the combinations of liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine as well as cytarabine and idarubicin or daunorubicin as treatment options for acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
The FDA has approved the combination of venetoclax and azacitidine for people with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that are over the age of 75 or who have comorbidities that preclude intensive induction chemotherapy.
Venetoclax may interact with BCL-2 (a protein that initiates tumor growth, disease progression, and drug resistance) and inhibit BLC-2 which can lead to cancer cell death. Azacitidine may cause cell death in rapidly dividing cells, which may lead to cancer cell death since cancer cells do not grow at a normal rate. Induction Chemotherapy which includes the drugs idarubicin or daunorubicin, cytarabine, and liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine is the standard of care chemotherapy treatment for someone with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
The research study procedures include screening for eligibility and study treatment, including evaluations and follow up visits.
Participants will receive study treatment for as long as they and their doctor believe they are benefitting from the study drugs. Participants will then be followed for 3 years or until they withdraw their consent to be contacted.
It is expected that about 172 people will take part in this research study.
AbbVie, a biopharmaceutical company, is supporting this research study by providing funding for the study, including one of the study drugs.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Intravenous infusion
Other names: Ara-C, Arabinosylcytosine
Intravenous infusion
Intravenous infusion
Intravenous infusion
Other names: Vyxeos
Orally by mouth
Other names: Venclexta
Intravenous infusion
Other names: Vidaza
Time frame: From the time from randomization to time for up to 3 years, per protocol.
Primary endpoint is event-free-survival of patients treated with venetoclax and azacitidine compared to patients treated with standard induction with either 7+3 regimen or liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine
Events are described in the protocol and will include
Assessments of differences in EFS between the randomized arms will be made with the log-rank test; modeling will employ the Cox proportional hazards model. We also plan to assess the difference in estimated EFS at one year, using Kaplan-Meier estimates with standard deviation calculated by Greenwood's formula.
EFS will be assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. EFS will be assessed with the log-rank test, and cox proportional hazards model when appropriate.
Time frame: From the time from randomization to time for up to 6 months.
Evaluated overall and separately for patients with primary and secondary AML, comparisons will be based on the Fisher exact test.
CR and CRi will be assessed. Study also includes CRh as a possible response, CRh aims to describe marrow blast clearance and evidence of partial hematologic recovery not captured by current CR or CRi, criteria.
Time frame: Enrollment to end of treatment duration for up to 12 months.
Assessed using CTCAE 5
Time frame: From time of enrollment until up to the first 6 months.
Assessed by flow cytometry and next-generation sequencing
Time frame: From the time of start of therapy until through the first 30 days.
Analyzed using the Kaplan Meier method.
Time frame: From the time of start of therapy until through the first 60 days.
Analyzed using the Kaplan Meier method.
Time frame: Overall Survival (OS) is defined as the time from randomization (or registration) to death due to any cause, or censored at date last known alive, or for up to 3 years.
Survival will be summarized using the method of Kaplan Meier, and assessed using the log rank test and Cox proportional hazards when appropriate.
Time frame: From time of enrollment until up to 3 years following start of treatment.
The proportion of patients that receive a hematopoietic stem cell transplant following induction therapy or consolidation/continuation therapy.
Time frame: up to one year
To compare quality of life between the two groups using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leuk). the FACT-Leukemia ranges from 0-176 with higher scores indicating better quality of life
Time frame: up to one year
To compare depression symptoms between the two groups using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-Depression). the HADS-depression ranges from 0 (no distress) to 21 (maximum distress) with higher scores indicating worse depression symptoms
Time frame: up to one year
To compare anxiety symptoms between the two groups using the Hospital Anxieyt and Depression Scale (HADS-Anxiety). the HADS-Anxiety ranges from 0 (no distress) to 21 (maximum distress) with higher scores indicating worse anxiety symptoms
Time frame: up to one year
To compare symptom burden between the two groups using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS-revised). ESAS ranges from 0-100 with higher scores indicating worse symptom burden
Time frame: up to one year
To compare post-traumatic stress (PTSD) symptoms between the two groups using the PTSD-Checklist-Civilian Version. The PTSD-Checklist ranges from 17-85 with higher scores indicating worse PTSD symptoms
Time frame: up to 1 year
To compare number of hospitalizations between the two groups using linear regression (and adjusting for any potential imbalances between the groups
Time frame: up to 1 year
To compare days alive and out of the hospital between the two groups using linear regression (and adjusting for any potential imbalances between the groups)
Time frame: up to 1 year
To compare intensive care unit admissions (yes vs. no) between the two groups using logistic regression (and adjusting for any potential imbalances between the groups)
Time frame: up to 1 year
To compare cost of care between the two groups using parametric and non-parametric tests based on distribution of the data
Time frame: Up to 8 weeks
Number of patients that experience neutropenic fever during induction cycles (up to 2 cycles).
Time frame: From date of transplantation through 100 days following transplantation.
Assessed using the Kaplan Meier method
Time frame: Patients that receive a SCT will be followed post-SCT through up to 100 days.
Assessed among patients that receive HSCT following induction.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Other
A Phase 2 Randomized Study Comparing Venetoclax and Azacitidine to Induction Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Fit Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06232655
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Disease Attributes
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05457556
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05589896
Acute Biphenotypic Leukemia, Acute Leukemia
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05233618
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Bone Marrow Diseases
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial Details