KH North Vienna
Vienna, 1230, Austria
NCT Number: NCT04614077
Since Saline is still the most widely used storage and flushing solution in cardiovascular procedures despite knowing evidence of its influence on the human endothelial cell function the main aim of this study was to assess the effect of DuraGraft©, an intraoperative graft treatment solution, on human saphenous vein segments 8 Remnants from the operation after trimming the bypass length), rat aortic segments and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) in comparison to saline.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–85 year
All sexes
Observational
Vienna, 1230, Austria
Saline is still the most widely used storage and flushing solution in cardiovascular procedures despite knowing evidence of its influence on the human endothelial cell function. Aim of this study was to assess the effect of DuraGraft©, an intraoperative graft treatment solution, on human saphenous vein segments, rat aortic segments and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) in comparison to saline. According to literature saline could have detrimental effects on the endothelium but data shows conflicting evidence. Duragraft a so called endothelial preservation solution should protect the human endothelium. Intent of this observational study was to study the effects of both solutions and compare them.
Within 12 patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass surgery, left overs from saphenous vein graft segments were randomized to DuraGraft© (n=12/6) or saline (n=12/6) solution before intraoperative storage. These segments as well as rat aortic segments underwent assessment of vascular function in a multichamber isometric myograph system in comparison to Krebs-Henseleit solution (KHS), a physiologic organ buffer solution. Additionally, human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were used for cell viability tests.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
1 piece of vein is separated during surgical bypass procedure, then randomized and put ex vivo in two solutions: saline and specific solution, then tested in the organ bath
Other names: organ bath ex vivo comparing saline vs specific solution
Time frame: 3 hours
defines significant contraction or relaxation between the two solutions, a myograph will be used, every change above 5 nM will be seen as significant.
Time frame: 60 minutes
shows significant difference between the two solutions, cell number of living cells will be simply counted and compared between the two solutions using a standard microscope and counting chamber
Klinikum Floridsdorf
Other
Acronym: VGE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03889678
Extravasation, Vein Injury
Augusta, Georgia, United States
View Trial Details