Drexel University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19102, United States
NCT Number: NCT00948974
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of two variants of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) (cognitive therapy (CT) and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT)), for the treatment of generalized social anxiety disorder.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19102, United States
We are recruiting a clinical sample of patients who meet diagnostic criteria (per DSM-5) for the generalized subtype of social anxiety disorder. Participants are randomly assigned to the two active intervention conditions; no placebo or sham treatments will be employed. Assessments take place at baseline, pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment, and at 3- and 12-months follow-up; participants also complete a brief weekly assessment of functioning. Treatment is administered individually by trained graduate students in clinical psychology, directly trained and supervised by the PI and Co-PI. Participants receive 12 weekly 1-hour long sessions. The study design is a 2 (treatment condition) by 5 (assessment occasion) mixed factorial design.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Cognitive therapy (CT) highlights the identification and reappraisal of distorted or dysfunctional cognitions in the treatment of psychopathology. For example, socially anxious patients are taught to identify the thoughts and underlying beliefs that trigger strong emotional reactions (e.g., "if I attempt to initiate a conversation I'll humiliate myself"), and then replace these with more accurate, functional thoughts. There is a large body of research supporting the efficacy of CT for mood and anxiety disorders, and for social anxiety disorder in particular (Beck, 2005).
Other names: CT
ACT does not attempt to modify cognitions directly, but rather seeks to foster a mindful acceptance of whatever thoughts or feelings arise, while still pursuing specific behavioral goals. For example, the individual would be taught simply to notice the thoughts as if from a distance without attempting to modify them, and initiate a conversation. Like other newer mindfulness and acceptance-based models of CBT, ACT also expands the traditional focus on symptom reduction to include an emphasis on broader life goals. The scientific literature on ACT has expanded rapidly over the past ten years. Recent reviews conclude that it appears to be at least as effective as CT, and may work at least in part via distinct treatment mechanisms (Powers, Zum Vörde Sive Vörding, & Emmelkamp, 2009).
Other names: ACT
Time frame: baseline (pre-treatment; immediately prior to beginning treatment); post-treatment (12 weeks)
The SPAI social phobia assess symptoms of social anxiety in the presence of (a) strangers, (b) authority figures, (c) members of the opposite sex, and (d) people in general. The subscale ranges from 32 to 192, where higher scores reflect more severe symptoms of social anxiety.
Time frame: baseline (pre-treatment; just before beginning treatment); post-treatment (12 weeks)
The Outcomes Questionnaire is a 45-item measure that assesses functioning and is comprised of three subscales: symptom distress, interpersonal relationships, and social role performance, that are combined to create a total score. Scores range from 45 to 180, where higher scores reflect greater levels of dysfunction.
Time frame: baseline (pre-treatment; just prior to beginning treatment); post-treatment (12 weeks)
The assessment consists of two role-played interpersonal interactions and an impromptu speech. The role-plays were video recorded for subsequent rating by two independent assessors. Using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = poor and 5 = excellent), assessors rated global social skills, which were comprised of assessments of verbal content (e.g., amount of speech during task and degree to which speech was relevant and appropriate), nonverbal skills (e.g., degree of fidgeting and eye contact; appropriateness of gestures and posture), and paralinguistic skills (e.g., appropriateness of tone, enunciation, inflection, and rate). Prior research has employed this behavioral assessment protocol (Glassman et al., 2016; Herbert et al., 2005). These results reflect global social skills, which reflect the sum of ratings of verbal, nonverbal, and paralinguistic skills. Scores range from 3 to 15 with higher scores reflecting better social skills.
Drexel University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06054386
Anxiety Disorders, Mental Disorders
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07562633
Anxiety Disorders, Mental Disorders
Gujranwala, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT05503017
Anxiety Disorders, Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Tallahassee, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03175068
Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details