Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05227677

Value of Glycated Albumin in Intervention of Glycemic Control in Chinese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

HbA1c is widely used as the gold standard for evaluating glycemic control. However, in patients who need adjusting hypoglycemic regimen, A1c was not a sensitive marker. In comparison, serum GA level can reflect the average blood glucose level in the last 2~3 weeks of diabetes.

Therefore, investigators undertake this study to determine whether knowledge of GA values and adjusting anti-diabetic regimens according to GA values will result in improved glycemic control in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

This multicenter randomized controlled clinical study will be conducted in 10 hospitals in China. A total of 200 patients with newly diagnosed T2DM will be 1:1 randomly assigned to two groups: intervention group (GA) and control group (NC). In GA group, the anti-diabetic treatment regimen will be strengthened when GA value is higher than 16% at 4 weeks. In NC group, investigators will be not aware of the GA value and rely on the current guidelines to adjust treatment. At 12-week of follow-up,investigators compare the achievement rate of HbA1c(<7%) between the two groups.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The third people's hospital of DATONG, Datong, Shanxi, China

Loading trial locations.

About this study

At present, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is widely used as the gold standard for evaluating glycemic control. However, as a marker of average blood glucose level, HbA1c has some limitations. HbA1c is affected by many conditions, such as hemolytic anemia, recent blood loss or blood transfusion, chronic renal failure, the use of erythropoietin or other drugs affecting hematopoiesis, and the presence of variant hemoglobin. In addition, HbA1c represents the average blood glucose level in the last 2-3 months, in patients who need adjusting hypoglycemic regimen, A1c was not a sensitive marker. Therefore, finding clinical markers that can timely guide the adjustment and evaluate therapeutic effects is an urgent demand for individualized treatment of diabetes.

Glycated albumin (GA) has been available in clinic for sixteen years, yet the clinical value of routine measurements of GA in the care of diabetic patients is still uncertain. Previous studies have shown that the GA half-life is 17-19 days, so the serum GA level can reflect the average blood glucose level and the recent blood glucose changes and the extent of the changes in the last 2~3 weeks of diabetes, and is not affected by age, gender, diet, drugs and glycemic fluctuation. A recent short-term study found that in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients with initial therapy and in patients with type 2 diabetes and unsatisfactory glucose control and need intensifying treatment, changes in GA could predict changes in HbA1c levels after 3 months. Therefore, investigators undertake this study to determine whether knowledge of GA values and adjusting anti-diabetic regimens according to GA values will result in improved glycemic control in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

This multicenter randomized controlled clinical study will be conducted in 10 hospitals in China. A total of 200 patients with newly diagnosed T2DM will be 1:1 randomly assigned to two groups: intervention group (GA) and control group (NC). In this study, the clinical related indexes such as GA, fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, fasting C-peptide, fasting insulin, liver and kidney function, blood routine, blood uric acid and blood lipid were measured at baseline. The GA serum was frozen and not used as the basis for initial treatment. All the patients will be treated with antidiabetic therapy according to guideline for prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes in China (2020) and followed up for 12 weeks. The GA concentration will be measured at 4-week intervals. In GA group, the anti-diabetic treatment regimen will be strengthened when GA value is higher than 16% at 4 weeks. In NC group, investigators will be not aware of the GA value and rely on the current guidelines to adjust treatment. At the end of 12 weeks, A1c and other metabolic indexes will be measured again. All the anti-diabetic drugs are permitted in this study except sulfonylureas, glinides, insulin and insulin analogues.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 20-70 years of age
  • newly diagnosed T2DM or duration of T2DM less than 1 year and without anti-diabetic medications for 3 months prior to screening
  • HbA1c ≥7.5% and <10.5%

Exclusion criteria

  • Requiring treatment of proliferative retinopathy, maculopathy, painful diabetic neuropathy, diabetic foot, diabetic ketoacidosis, or hyperglycemic hyperosmolar status in recent 3 months prior to screening.
  • The following history or conditions in recent 6 months prior to screening: (i) decompensated cardiac insufficiency (NYHA class III or IV); (ii)myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting or coronary stent implantation; (iii) uncontrolled severe arrhythmia and is not suitable to participate in this study evaluated by the investigator; (iv) hemorrhagic stroke or ischemic stroke and is not suitable to participate in this study evaluated by the investigator.
  • Laboratory indicators meet one of the following criteria: (i) alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 3× upper limit of normal(ULN); (ii) total bilirubin > 2× ULN; (iii) hemoglobin <100g/L; (iv)total protein <60g/L; (v)albumin <30g/L; (vi) glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)<60 ml min-1 per 1.73 m2.
  • Thalassemia, hemolytic anemia and other diseases that may cause erythrocyte instability and affect the measurement of HbA1c.
  • Uncontrolled thyroid dysfunction.
  • Systemic corticosteroids treatment in recent 1 month prior to screening (exception of inhalation or local external treatment).
  • Pregnancy or lactating.
  • Two or more episodes of severe hypoglycemia in recent 1 year prior to screening.
  • Patient who need to initiate treatment with sulfonylureas, glinides, insulin or insulin analogues evaluated by the investigators.
  • Patient is being treated with calcium dobesilate or has a disease requiring calcium dobesilate treatment, or may be treated with calcium dobesilate in the near future evaluated by the investigators.
  • Patients considered unsuitable for observation by investigators.

Treatment and study plan

GA guided anti-diabetic therapy adjustment

Other

The GA values will be measured at 4-week intervals in both groups. The anti-diabetic treatment regimen will be strengthened when GA value is higher than 16% at 4 weeks.

current guidelines to adjust treatment

Other

The GA values will be measured at 4-week intervals. Investigators will be not aware of the GA value and rely on the current guidelines to adjust treatment.

Primary outcomes

  1. The Achievement Rate of HbA1c (<7%)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    To compare the achievement rate of HbA1c(<7%) between the two groups at 12-week of follow-up.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Achievement Rate of HbA1c(<6.5%)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    To compare the achievement rate of HbA1c(<6.5%) between the two groups at 12-week of follow-up.

  2. The Achievement Rate of HbA1c (<6%)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    To compare the achievement rate of HbA1c(<6%) between the two groups at 12-week of follow-up.

  3. Change in HbA1c Levels

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    To compare the change of HbA1c levels between the two groups after 12-week of follow-up.

  4. Rate of Change in HbA1c Levels

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    To compare the rate of change in HbA1c measurements between the two groups after 12-week of follow-up.

  5. Rate of Hypoglycemic Events

    Time frame: at visit 3(4 weeks) and visit 4(8 weeks)

    To compare the rate of hypoglycemic events between the two groups

  6. Change in HOMA-β Levels

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    To compare the change in HOMA-β levels between the two groups after 12-week of follow-up.

  7. Percent Change in HOMA-β Levels

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    To compare the rate in change of HOMA-β levels between the two groups after 12-week of follow-up.

  8. Change in HOMA-IR Levels

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    To compare the change in HOMA-IR between two groups after 12 weeks of follow-up.

    The HOMA-IR (Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance) index is a widely used surrogate marker for assessing insulin resistance. It is calculated as:

    HOMA-IR = (Fasting Insulin [μU/mL] × Fasting Glucose [mg/dL]) / 405

    Interpretation:

    Lower HOMA-IR values indicate better insulin sensitivity. Higher HOMA-IR values suggest increased insulin resistance.

    Typical Reference Ranges:

    1.0-1.9: Normal range 2.0-2.9: Early insulin resistance

    ≥3.0: Significant insulin resistance

    Note: These ranges may vary depending on population characteristics and laboratory standards. There is no universally defined theoretical minimum or maximum value. Clinical thresholds such as ≥2.5 or ≥3.0 are commonly used to indicate insulin resistance in adults.

  9. Percent Change in HOMA-IR Levels

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    To compare the rate of change in HOMA-IR levels between the two groups after 12-week of follow-up.

  10. Change in Weight

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    To compare the change in weight between two groups after 12 weeks of follow-up.

  11. Percent Change in Weight

    Time frame: 12weeks

    To compare the rate of change in weight between the two groups at 12-week of follow-up.

  12. Change in Waist Circumferences

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    To compare the change in waist circumferences between two groups after 12 weeks of follow-up.

  13. Percent Change in Waist Circumferences

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    To compare the rate of change in waist circumferences between the two groups after 12-week of follow-up.

  14. Change in BMI

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    To compare the change in BMI between two groups after 12 weeks of follow-up.

  15. Percent Change in BMI

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    To compare the rate of change in BMI between the two groups after 12-week of follow-up.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Asahi Kasei Therapeutics Corporation

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Value of Glycated Albumin in Intervention of Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Feb 7, 2022
Registry last updated
Dec 4, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.