GA guided anti-diabetic therapy adjustment
OtherThe GA values will be measured at 4-week intervals in both groups. The anti-diabetic treatment regimen will be strengthened when GA value is higher than 16% at 4 weeks.
NCT Number: NCT05227677
HbA1c is widely used as the gold standard for evaluating glycemic control. However, in patients who need adjusting hypoglycemic regimen, A1c was not a sensitive marker. In comparison, serum GA level can reflect the average blood glucose level in the last 2~3 weeks of diabetes.
Therefore, investigators undertake this study to determine whether knowledge of GA values and adjusting anti-diabetic regimens according to GA values will result in improved glycemic control in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
This multicenter randomized controlled clinical study will be conducted in 10 hospitals in China. A total of 200 patients with newly diagnosed T2DM will be 1:1 randomly assigned to two groups: intervention group (GA) and control group (NC). In GA group, the anti-diabetic treatment regimen will be strengthened when GA value is higher than 16% at 4 weeks. In NC group, investigators will be not aware of the GA value and rely on the current guidelines to adjust treatment. At 12-week of follow-up,investigators compare the achievement rate of HbA1c(<7%) between the two groups.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
The third people's hospital of DATONG, Datong, Shanxi, China
At present, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is widely used as the gold standard for evaluating glycemic control. However, as a marker of average blood glucose level, HbA1c has some limitations. HbA1c is affected by many conditions, such as hemolytic anemia, recent blood loss or blood transfusion, chronic renal failure, the use of erythropoietin or other drugs affecting hematopoiesis, and the presence of variant hemoglobin. In addition, HbA1c represents the average blood glucose level in the last 2-3 months, in patients who need adjusting hypoglycemic regimen, A1c was not a sensitive marker. Therefore, finding clinical markers that can timely guide the adjustment and evaluate therapeutic effects is an urgent demand for individualized treatment of diabetes.
Glycated albumin (GA) has been available in clinic for sixteen years, yet the clinical value of routine measurements of GA in the care of diabetic patients is still uncertain. Previous studies have shown that the GA half-life is 17-19 days, so the serum GA level can reflect the average blood glucose level and the recent blood glucose changes and the extent of the changes in the last 2~3 weeks of diabetes, and is not affected by age, gender, diet, drugs and glycemic fluctuation. A recent short-term study found that in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients with initial therapy and in patients with type 2 diabetes and unsatisfactory glucose control and need intensifying treatment, changes in GA could predict changes in HbA1c levels after 3 months. Therefore, investigators undertake this study to determine whether knowledge of GA values and adjusting anti-diabetic regimens according to GA values will result in improved glycemic control in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
This multicenter randomized controlled clinical study will be conducted in 10 hospitals in China. A total of 200 patients with newly diagnosed T2DM will be 1:1 randomly assigned to two groups: intervention group (GA) and control group (NC). In this study, the clinical related indexes such as GA, fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, fasting C-peptide, fasting insulin, liver and kidney function, blood routine, blood uric acid and blood lipid were measured at baseline. The GA serum was frozen and not used as the basis for initial treatment. All the patients will be treated with antidiabetic therapy according to guideline for prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes in China (2020) and followed up for 12 weeks. The GA concentration will be measured at 4-week intervals. In GA group, the anti-diabetic treatment regimen will be strengthened when GA value is higher than 16% at 4 weeks. In NC group, investigators will be not aware of the GA value and rely on the current guidelines to adjust treatment. At the end of 12 weeks, A1c and other metabolic indexes will be measured again. All the anti-diabetic drugs are permitted in this study except sulfonylureas, glinides, insulin and insulin analogues.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The GA values will be measured at 4-week intervals in both groups. The anti-diabetic treatment regimen will be strengthened when GA value is higher than 16% at 4 weeks.
The GA values will be measured at 4-week intervals. Investigators will be not aware of the GA value and rely on the current guidelines to adjust treatment.
Time frame: 12 weeks
To compare the achievement rate of HbA1c(<7%) between the two groups at 12-week of follow-up.
Time frame: 12 weeks
To compare the achievement rate of HbA1c(<6.5%) between the two groups at 12-week of follow-up.
Time frame: 12 weeks
To compare the achievement rate of HbA1c(<6%) between the two groups at 12-week of follow-up.
Time frame: 12 weeks
To compare the change of HbA1c levels between the two groups after 12-week of follow-up.
Time frame: 12 weeks
To compare the rate of change in HbA1c measurements between the two groups after 12-week of follow-up.
Time frame: at visit 3(4 weeks) and visit 4(8 weeks)
To compare the rate of hypoglycemic events between the two groups
Time frame: 12 weeks
To compare the change in HOMA-β levels between the two groups after 12-week of follow-up.
Time frame: 12 weeks
To compare the rate in change of HOMA-β levels between the two groups after 12-week of follow-up.
Time frame: 12 weeks
To compare the change in HOMA-IR between two groups after 12 weeks of follow-up.
The HOMA-IR (Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance) index is a widely used surrogate marker for assessing insulin resistance. It is calculated as:
HOMA-IR = (Fasting Insulin [μU/mL] × Fasting Glucose [mg/dL]) / 405
Interpretation:
Lower HOMA-IR values indicate better insulin sensitivity. Higher HOMA-IR values suggest increased insulin resistance.
Typical Reference Ranges:
1.0-1.9: Normal range 2.0-2.9: Early insulin resistance
≥3.0: Significant insulin resistance
Note: These ranges may vary depending on population characteristics and laboratory standards. There is no universally defined theoretical minimum or maximum value. Clinical thresholds such as ≥2.5 or ≥3.0 are commonly used to indicate insulin resistance in adults.
Time frame: 12 weeks
To compare the rate of change in HOMA-IR levels between the two groups after 12-week of follow-up.
Time frame: 12 weeks
To compare the change in weight between two groups after 12 weeks of follow-up.
Time frame: 12weeks
To compare the rate of change in weight between the two groups at 12-week of follow-up.
Time frame: 12 weeks
To compare the change in waist circumferences between two groups after 12 weeks of follow-up.
Time frame: 12 weeks
To compare the rate of change in waist circumferences between the two groups after 12-week of follow-up.
Time frame: 12 weeks
To compare the change in BMI between two groups after 12 weeks of follow-up.
Time frame: 12 weeks
To compare the rate of change in BMI between the two groups after 12-week of follow-up.
Asahi Kasei Therapeutics Corporation
Industry
Value of Glycated Albumin in Intervention of Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03899883
Diabetes, Diabetes Complications
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05313529
Cognition Disorders, Cognitive Dysfunction
Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05684341
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Changhua, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT07255820
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Diabetes Mellitus
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
View Trial Details