Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07746050

Value of Biomarkers of Brain Injury for Predicting Psycho-cognitive Sequelae Secondary to Sepsis: a Prospective Multicenter Study

To evaluate the value of biomarkers of neuronal and glial injury for predicting cognitive impairment (memory impairment assessed by a MoCA score < 26/30) at 3 months in patient admitted in the intensive care unit for a sepsis or a septic shock.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hôpital Cochin - APHP Centre

Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75014, France

Location contact

Sarah BENGHANEM, Dr

CONTACT

[email protected]

01 58 41 25 25 ext. +33

About this study

Sepsis is a major cause of admission to intensive care units and is responsible for approximately 11 million deaths worldwide each year. It may be complicated by an acute brain dysfunction known as sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE), which affects about 50% of patients and typically manifests as delirium or coma. The diagnosis of SAE is primarily clinical, with EEG and brain MRI providing supportive information. Risk factors for SAE are mainly related to patient characteristics, including advanced age, chronic kidney disease, and pre-existing neurodegenerative or cognitive disorders. The pathophysiology of SAE involves three major mechanisms: neuroinflammation, endothelial dysfunction with blood-brain barrier disruption, and mitochondrial dysfunction leading to neuronal injury. These mechanisms likely explain both acute neurological symptoms and long-term psycho-cognitive sequelae. Following sepsis, 30-60% of patients develop psychiatric disorders and cognitive impairments comparable to those observed after moderate traumatic brain injury or early Alzheimer's disease. These sequelae are part of post-intensive care syndrome (PICS), supporting the need for structured post-ICU follow-up. However, the optimal target population and organization of such follow-up remain unclear, as some studies have reported reduced quality of life in patients receiving long-term follow-up. Identifying early biomarkers predictive of psycho-cognitive outcomes is therefore crucial, as current data on neuronal and glial biomarkers remain limited. Such biomarkers could improve prognostication, guide cognitive rehabilitation and psychological support, and contribute to the development of future neuroprotective strategies.

Primary objective:

To evaluate the value of biomarkers of brain injury for predicting cognitive impairment (memory impairment assessed by a MoCA score < 26/30) at 3 months.

Secondary objectives:

  • To evaluate the value of brain injury biomarkers for predicting delirium in the ICU, including hypoactive, hyperactive, and mixed phenotypes
  • To assess the association between brain injury biomarkers and the duration of delirium in the ICU
  • To evaluate the value of brain injury biomarkers for predicting psychological sequelae (anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, and depression) at 3 months
  • To evaluate the value of brain injury biomarkers for predicting functional neurological outcomes using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended at ICU discharge and at 3 months
  • To assess the association between brain injury biomarkers and Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS)
  • To assess the association between brain injury biomarkers and EEG abnormalities in the ICU
  • To assess the association between brain injury biomarkers and MRI abnormalities at 3 months

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18-80 years.
  • Admission to a medical or mixed ICU.
  • Sepsis or septic shock according to Sepsis-3 criteria.
  • ICU admission for less than 24 hours.
  • Need for invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation and/or vasopressor support.
  • Informed consent obtained from the patient or legal representative.

Exclusion criteria

  • Moribund patients.
  • Age >80 years.
  • Patients under legal guardianship.
  • History of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.
  • Pregnancy.
  • No health insurance coverage.
  • Previous inclusion in the study.
  • Refusal to participate.

Treatment and study plan

Serum

Biological

Neurofilament light chain NfL, brain-derived tau, GFAP, UCHL1, p-tau217, s100B, neurone specific enolase NSE, sTREM2, YKL-40

Primary outcomes

  1. Cognitive function impairment assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score at 3 months

    Time frame: 3 months

    Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) ranges from 0 to 30 points, with higher scores indicating better cognitive performance. Cognitive impairment will be defined as a MoCA score <26/30.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Coma- and/or delirium-free days

    Time frame: Day 10 after inclusion

  2. Duration of delirium in the intensive care unit (ICU)

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Type of ICU delirium: hypoactive, hyperactive, or mixed

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. Psychiatric disorders (anxiety, depression : ( 0 =min; 21 =max) , or PTSD)

    Time frame: 3 months

  5. Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE)

    Time frame: 3 months

  6. Delirium duration

    Time frame: 3 months

    Number of ICU days with delirium assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU). Delirium duration will be reported as the cumulative number of ICU days with at least one positive CAM-ICU assessment. Higher values indicate longer delirium duration.

  7. Delirium phenotype

    Time frame: 3 months

    ICU delirium phenotype classified as hypoactive, hyperactive or mixed according to CAM-ICU and RASS assessments. Results will be reported as the proportion of patients in each category.

  8. Psychiatric outcomes

    Time frame: 3 months

    Symptoms of anxiety and depression assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; higher scores indicate greater symptom severity). PTSD assessed using the PTSD Checklist (PCL-5). Results will be reported as continuous scores and proportions of patients above validated thresholds

  9. Functional outcome

    Time frame: 3 months

    Functional neurological outcome assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE; range 1-8, higher scores indicate better functional recovery).

  10. PICS : Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS)

    Time frame: 3 months

    PICS is defined by the presence of cognitive impairment, psychiatric symptoms and/or physical disability at 3 months. Results will be reported as the proportion of patients fulfilling at least one PICS domain.

  11. Neurological, psychiatric, or rehabilitation follow-up proposed to the patient

    Time frame: 3 months

    Referral for specialized follow-up after ICU discharge. This outcome will be reported as the proportion of patients referred to neurological consultation, psychiatric consultation, cognitive rehabilitation, physical rehabilitation and/or a multidisciplinary post-ICU clinic.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Adèle BELLINO

CONTACT

[email protected]

01 71 76 07 57 ext. +33

Sarah BENGHANEM, Dr

CONTACT

[email protected]

01 58 41 25 25 ext. +33

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Other

Collaborators

  • ANR and Ministry of Health
  • URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin

Registry information

Acronym: SEPSYM

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Aug 4, 2026
Registry last updated
Aug 4, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.