Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05343585

Validity of an AI-based Program to Identify Foods and Estimate Food Portion Size

The purpose of this study is to test the accuracy of the Nutrition Artificial Intelligence in the Openfit app during meals in a controlled laboratory setting

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–62 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Pennington Biomedical Research Center

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70808, United States

About this study

For this pilot study, using a convenience sample, the investigators will recruit up to 25 adults to use the Nutrition AI technology in Openfit to identify and estimate portion size of foods plated in a laboratory setting at Pennington Biomedical Research Center (PBRC) and/or Louisiana State University (LSU). Laboratory members within the Ingestive Behavioral Laboratory will also test the ability of Nutrition AI to identify foods and to quantify foods provided in the laboratory. Meals will be simulated, and participants will not consume the foods provided.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female
  • Aged 18-62 years
  • Self-reported body mass index (BMI) 18.5-50 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

  • Any condition or circumstance that could impede study completion
  • Unfamiliar with or not able to use an iPhone

Treatment and study plan

PortionSize AI

Device

For this pilot study, using a convenience sample, the investigators will recruit up to 25 adults to use the Nutrition AI technology in Openfit to identify and estimate portion size of foods provided in a laboratory setting at Pennington Biomedical Research Center (PBRC) and/or Louisiana State University (LSU). Laboratory members within the Ingestive Behavioral Laboratory will also test the ability of Nutrition AI to identify foods and to quantify foods provided in the laboratory. Meals will be simulated, and participants will not consume the foods provided.

Primary outcomes

  1. Identification of Food Plated Using the Openfit Mobile App

    Time frame: One study visit of ~2 hours

    Agreement surrounding identification of food and beverages provided compared with known identification, at the item level, and across all items where identification is determined by: 1) Nutrition AI without correction (automated), 2) Nutrition AI with user correction (semi-automated)

    For a food identified through the Nutrition AI to be considered an exact food match, the name of the food identified must match or be a close match to the food served. For example, a fruit cocktail identified as a fruit salad is an acceptable match. Proportions will be used to assess whether the percentage of food items plated that were correctly identified by Nutrition AI is different to the percentage of foods correctly identified by a criterion method (human rater). Descriptive data will also be used to describe the frequency at which food plated was correctly identified for all food items across all participants. In total there was 255 food items tested across all participants.

  2. Portion Size Estimation (kcal) of Food Plated Using the Openfit Mobile App

    Time frame: One study visit of ~2 hours

    Error between mean estimates of food plated (kcal) and known food plated (kcal), determined by: 1) Nutrition AI without user correction (automated), 2) Nutrition AI with user correction (semi-automated)

    Mean error and Bland-Altman analysis will be performed to determine errors in estimation of food plated from the Nutrition AI compared to estimations from the criterion measure (weighed food).

  3. User Satisfaction of the Openfit Mobile App for Recording Food Plated

    Time frame: One study visit of ~2 hours

    After completing assessment of food plated, participants will complete a user satisfaction survey (USS). The USS was adapted from a previous version used to assess the usability of a mobile application for dietary assessment. The USS includes five quantitative questions and three open response questions. The quantitative questions will each be scored using a 6-point Likert scale, with 1 being the lowest and worst score, and 6 being the highest and best score.

    Data for each of the five quantitative responses in the USS will be averaged across participants and presented separately as mean (SD). Open responses will be evaluated using qualitative methods to identify common themes.

  4. Usability of the Openfit Mobile App for Recording Food Plated

    Time frame: One study visit of ~2 hours

    Participants will complete the Computer Usability Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSUQ). The CSUQ is frequently used to assess the usability of mobile applications. The CSUQ consists of 19 questions, each scored using a 7-point Likert scale (with 1 being the lowest and best score and 7 being the highest and worst score) and participants will rate satisfaction, usefulness, information quality, and interface quality of the Openfit app. The average of these 19 questions (1 being the best average score and 7 being the worst average score) provides an overall usability score.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Pennington Biomedical Research Center

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

Registry information

Official study title

Testing the Validity of an Artificial Intelligence-based Program to Identify Foods and Estimate Food Portion Size Among Adults, a Pilot Study

Acronym: PortionSizeAI

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Apr 25, 2022
Registry last updated
Nov 18, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.