Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05871411

Validation of Visual Analog Scales to Measure SatisfactiOn and WELL-being at Work (SoWell-VAS)

We spend a third of our life at work. Psychosocial risks (PSR) are a major issue in occupational health 1. Approaching the different dimensions of PSR calls on a dozen essential components: workload, autonomy, social support, burnout, anxiety, efforts made, rewards, work addiction, investment, etc. a specific questionnaire which usually contains 20 to 30 questions, so that having an overall view of PSR using the current reference questionnaires (Karasek, Siegrist, etc.) represents a total of more than 300 questions. The response time is thus incompatible with current medical practice (passage in the waiting room before the occupational health medical examination) and leads to a majority of non-responses during anonymous questionnaires on the Internet. On the other hand, these validated questionnaires were carried out by different people and are very heterogeneous between them, including in their formulation, so that the respondents have the impression of disorganization and anarchy. There is therefore a need for short, quick and uniform questionnaires. EVAs offer the incredible advantage of meeting these criteria: speed, uniformity, precision. From a data analysis point of view, EVAs also have the advantage of offering a continuous quantitative response, allowing the use of all statistical approaches. If some questionnaires have already been validated in the form of EVA, such as the EVA stress versus the " Perceived Stress Scale " questionnaire (PSS), the EVA workload and EVA autonomy at work versus the Karasek questionnaire, the other reference questionnaires are not yet validated in EVA (burnout, anxiety, efforts / rewards, work addiction, etc.).

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

CHU clermont-ferrand

Clermont-Ferrand, France

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Frédéric Dutheil

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Lise Laclautre

CONTACT

Who can participate

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All voluntary adults with a professional activity.

Exclusion criteria

  • Minor
  • Person not volunteer to participate.
  • Protected adults (curatorship, guardianship, safeguard of justice)

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Burnout

    Time frame: Inclusion

    Burnout on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)

  2. Burnout

    Time frame: One week later

    Burnout on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)

  3. Burnout

    Time frame: Inclusion

    Burnout using the Maslach Burn-out Inventory (MBI) questionnaire. MBI is composed of 22 items designed to assess the three components of the burn-out syndrome: emotional exhaustion (9 items), depersonalization (5 items) and reduced personal accomplishment (8 items). The items are written in the form of statements about personal feelings or attitudes. Items are made of a 7-point scale frequency of feelings, varying from "never" to "every day". The scores for each component of the burn-out syndrome are considered separately and are not combined into a single total score. If desired for participant feedback, each score can be coded as low, average, or high

  4. Burnout

    Time frame: One week later

    Burnout using the Maslach Burn-out Inventory (MBI) questionnaire. MBI is composed of 22 items designed to assess the three components of the burn-out syndrome: emotional exhaustion (9 items), depersonalization (5 items) and reduced personal accomplishment (8 items). The items are written in the form of statements about personal feelings or attitudes. Items are made of a 7-point scale frequency of feelings, varying from "never" to "every day". The scores for each component of the burn-out syndrome are considered separately and are not combined into a single total score. If desired for participant feedback, each score can be coded as low, average, or high

  5. Anxiety

    Time frame: Inclusion

    Anxiety on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)

  6. Anxiety

    Time frame: One week later

    Anxiety on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)

  7. Anxiety

    Time frame: Inclusion

    Anxiety using Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) questionnaire. is a self-reported questionnaire composed of 14 items with a 4-point Likert scale assessing anxiety (7 items) and/or depressive (7 items) symptoms. For each subscale (anxiety and depression), total score ranges from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety or depressive symptoms. A score from 0 to 7 indicates the absence of disease, a score of 8-10 represents doubtful cases, and scores higher than 11 reflects the presence of a mood disorder.

  8. Anxiety

    Time frame: One week later

    Anxiety using Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) questionnaire. is a self-reported questionnaire composed of 14 items with a 4-point Likert scale assessing anxiety (7 items) and/or depressive (7 items) symptoms. For each subscale (anxiety and depression), total score ranges from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety or depressive symptoms. A score from 0 to 7 indicates the absence of disease, a score of 8-10 represents doubtful cases, and scores higher than 11 reflects the presence of a mood disorder.

  9. Job demand

    Time frame: Inclusion

    Job demand on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)

  10. Job demand

    Time frame: One week later

    Job demand on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)

  11. Job control

    Time frame: Inclusion

    Job control on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)

  12. Job control

    Time frame: One week later

    Job control on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)

  13. Social support

    Time frame: Inclusion

    Social support on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)

  14. Social support

    Time frame: One week later

    Social support on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)

  15. Job demand / job control / social support

    Time frame: Inclusion

    Job demand / job control / social support using the Job Demand-Control-Support (JDSC) questionnaire of Karasek. JDSC assessed job demands, job control and social support through 26 items. The questionnaire measures nine items of job demands, nine items of job control and eight items of social support. Items of JDSC are scored on a four-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree. Among the 26 items, five negative statements require reverse scoring. From French data, the job strain threshold is set for a demands score higher than 20 and a control score lower than 71; the isostrain threshold is determined from a combining score of job strain and social support lower than 24.

  16. Job demand / job control / social support

    Time frame: One week later

    Job demand / job control / social support using the Job Demand-Control-Support (JDSC) questionnaire of Karasek. JDSC assessed job demands, job control and social support through 26 items. The questionnaire measures nine items of job demands, nine items of job control and eight items of social support. Items of JDSC are scored on a four-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree. Among the 26 items, five negative statements require reverse scoring. From French data, the job strain threshold is set for a demands score higher than 20 and a control score lower than 71; the isostrain threshold is determined from a combining score of job strain and social support lower than 24.questionnaire of Karasek

  17. Effort-reward imbalance

    Time frame: Inclusion

    Effort-reward imbalance on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)

  18. Effort-reward imbalance

    Time frame: One week later

    Effort-reward imbalance on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)

  19. Effort-reward imbalance

    Time frame: Inclusion

    Effort-reward imbalance using Effort-Reward Imbalance Questionnaire (ERI). ERI assessed psychological distress and health problems that may occur when there is an imbalance between the efforts required by the work and the rewards received. We used the 46 items of the French version of the ERI model exploring efforts (six items), over commitment (eleven items), and rewards (seventeen items). Items of ERI were scored on a five-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 = disagree to 5 = agree and very disturbed. A ratio extrinsic efforts and rewards can assess the imbalance between these two dimensions. A ratio greater than one defines employees exposed to an imbalance between efforts and rewards

  20. Effort-reward imbalance

    Time frame: One week later

    Effort-reward imbalance using Effort-Reward Imbalance Questionnaire (ERI). ERI assessed psychological distress and health problems that may occur when there is an imbalance between the efforts required by the work and the rewards received. We used the 46 items of the French version of the ERI model exploring efforts (six items), over commitment (eleven items), and rewards (seventeen items). Items of ERI were scored on a five-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 = disagree to 5 = agree and very disturbed. A ratio extrinsic efforts and rewards can assess the imbalance between these two dimensions. A ratio greater than one defines employees exposed to an imbalance between efforts and rewards

  21. Work addiction

    Time frame: Inclusion

    Work addiction on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)

  22. Work addiction

    Time frame: One week later

    Work addiction on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)

  23. Work addiction

    Time frame: Inclusion

    Work addiction using Work Addiction Risk Test (WART) questionnaire. The WART assesses 25 statements on a 4-point Likert scale from 1 - never true to 4 - always true. The total score ranged from 25 to 100, with higher scores reflecting higher work addiction. Scores from 25 to 56 were defined as low-risk of work addiction; from 57 to 66 as medium-risk and from 67 to 100 as high-risk .

  24. Work addiction

    Time frame: One week later

    Work addiction using Work Addiction Risk Test (WART) questionnaire. The WART assesses 25 statements on a 4-point Likert scale from 1 - never true to 4 - always true. The total score ranged from 25 to 100, with higher scores reflecting higher work addiction. Scores from 25 to 56 were defined as low-risk of work addiction; from 57 to 66 as medium-risk and from 67 to 100 as high-risk .

  25. Life satisfaction

    Time frame: Inclusion

    Life satisfaction on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)

  26. Life satisfaction

    Time frame: One week later

    Life satisfaction on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)

  27. Life satisfaction

    Time frame: Inclusion

    Life satisfaction using the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ). MSQ is composed of 20 items designed to measure employee job satisfaction. Items are made of a 5-point scale of satisfaction, varying from 1 "Very dissatisfied" to 5 "Very satisfied". A percentile score of 75 or higher represent a high degree of satisfaction, a percentile score of 25 or lower represent a low degree of satisfaction and scores in the middle range of percentiles (26 to 74) indicated average satisfaction.

  28. Life satisfaction

    Time frame: One week later

    Life satisfaction using the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ). MSQ is composed of 20 items designed to measure employee job satisfaction. Items are made of a 5-point scale of satisfaction, varying from 1 "Very dissatisfied" to 5 "Very satisfied". A percentile score of 75 or higher represent a high degree of satisfaction, a percentile score of 25 or lower represent a low degree of satisfaction and scores in the middle range of percentiles (26 to 74) indicated average satisfaction.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sociodemographic

    Time frame: Once at inclusion

    age, gender, marital status, number of children, education level

  2. Occupation

    Time frame: Once at inclusion

    Question "What is your profession?"

  3. Work hours per week

    Time frame: Once at inclusion

    Number of hours worked per week

  4. Night and weekend work

    Time frame: Once at inclusion

    Do you work at night? Do you work weekends?

  5. Alcohol consumption

    Time frame: Once at inclusion

    Number of alcoholic drinks per week

  6. Tabacco consumption

    Time frame: Once at inclusion

    Number of cigarettes per day

  7. Height

    Time frame: Once at inclusion

    Height in cm

  8. Weight

    Time frame: Once at inclusion

    Weight in kg

  9. Sedentary behavior

    Time frame: Once at inclusion

    Number of hours sit per day

  10. Physical activity

    Time frame: Once at inclusion

    Number of hours of physical activity per day

  11. Stress at work

    Time frame: Once at inclusion

    stress at work level on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)

  12. Ethical conflicts

    Time frame: Once at inclusion

    Ethical conflicts confrontation on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from never (0) to often(100)

  13. Perceived health

    Time frame: Once at inclusion

    Perceived health on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from bad(0) to excellent (100)

  14. Stress at home

    Time frame: Once at inclusion

    stress at home level on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)

  15. Fatigue

    Time frame: Once at inclusion

    Fatigue level on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)

  16. Sleep quality

    Time frame: Once at inclusion

    Sleep quality level on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from bad(0) to excellent (100)

  17. Mood

    Time frame: Once at inclusion

    mood level on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from bad(0) to excellent (100)

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Lise Laclautre

CONTACT

[email protected]

334.73.754.963

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Other

Registry information

Acronym: SoWell-VAS

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2028
First posted
May 23, 2023
Registry last updated
Jul 30, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.