CHU clermont-ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, France
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Frédéric Dutheil
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Lise Laclautre
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT05871411
We spend a third of our life at work. Psychosocial risks (PSR) are a major issue in occupational health 1. Approaching the different dimensions of PSR calls on a dozen essential components: workload, autonomy, social support, burnout, anxiety, efforts made, rewards, work addiction, investment, etc. a specific questionnaire which usually contains 20 to 30 questions, so that having an overall view of PSR using the current reference questionnaires (Karasek, Siegrist, etc.) represents a total of more than 300 questions. The response time is thus incompatible with current medical practice (passage in the waiting room before the occupational health medical examination) and leads to a majority of non-responses during anonymous questionnaires on the Internet. On the other hand, these validated questionnaires were carried out by different people and are very heterogeneous between them, including in their formulation, so that the respondents have the impression of disorganization and anarchy. There is therefore a need for short, quick and uniform questionnaires. EVAs offer the incredible advantage of meeting these criteria: speed, uniformity, precision. From a data analysis point of view, EVAs also have the advantage of offering a continuous quantitative response, allowing the use of all statistical approaches. If some questionnaires have already been validated in the form of EVA, such as the EVA stress versus the " Perceived Stress Scale " questionnaire (PSS), the EVA workload and EVA autonomy at work versus the Karasek questionnaire, the other reference questionnaires are not yet validated in EVA (burnout, anxiety, efforts / rewards, work addiction, etc.).
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–80 year
All sexes
Observational
Clermont-Ferrand, France
Location status: Recruiting
Frédéric Dutheil
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Lise Laclautre
CONTACT
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: Inclusion
Burnout on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)
Time frame: One week later
Burnout on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)
Time frame: Inclusion
Burnout using the Maslach Burn-out Inventory (MBI) questionnaire. MBI is composed of 22 items designed to assess the three components of the burn-out syndrome: emotional exhaustion (9 items), depersonalization (5 items) and reduced personal accomplishment (8 items). The items are written in the form of statements about personal feelings or attitudes. Items are made of a 7-point scale frequency of feelings, varying from "never" to "every day". The scores for each component of the burn-out syndrome are considered separately and are not combined into a single total score. If desired for participant feedback, each score can be coded as low, average, or high
Time frame: One week later
Burnout using the Maslach Burn-out Inventory (MBI) questionnaire. MBI is composed of 22 items designed to assess the three components of the burn-out syndrome: emotional exhaustion (9 items), depersonalization (5 items) and reduced personal accomplishment (8 items). The items are written in the form of statements about personal feelings or attitudes. Items are made of a 7-point scale frequency of feelings, varying from "never" to "every day". The scores for each component of the burn-out syndrome are considered separately and are not combined into a single total score. If desired for participant feedback, each score can be coded as low, average, or high
Time frame: Inclusion
Anxiety on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)
Time frame: One week later
Anxiety on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)
Time frame: Inclusion
Anxiety using Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) questionnaire. is a self-reported questionnaire composed of 14 items with a 4-point Likert scale assessing anxiety (7 items) and/or depressive (7 items) symptoms. For each subscale (anxiety and depression), total score ranges from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety or depressive symptoms. A score from 0 to 7 indicates the absence of disease, a score of 8-10 represents doubtful cases, and scores higher than 11 reflects the presence of a mood disorder.
Time frame: One week later
Anxiety using Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) questionnaire. is a self-reported questionnaire composed of 14 items with a 4-point Likert scale assessing anxiety (7 items) and/or depressive (7 items) symptoms. For each subscale (anxiety and depression), total score ranges from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety or depressive symptoms. A score from 0 to 7 indicates the absence of disease, a score of 8-10 represents doubtful cases, and scores higher than 11 reflects the presence of a mood disorder.
Time frame: Inclusion
Job demand on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)
Time frame: One week later
Job demand on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)
Time frame: Inclusion
Job control on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)
Time frame: One week later
Job control on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)
Time frame: Inclusion
Social support on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)
Time frame: One week later
Social support on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)
Time frame: Inclusion
Job demand / job control / social support using the Job Demand-Control-Support (JDSC) questionnaire of Karasek. JDSC assessed job demands, job control and social support through 26 items. The questionnaire measures nine items of job demands, nine items of job control and eight items of social support. Items of JDSC are scored on a four-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree. Among the 26 items, five negative statements require reverse scoring. From French data, the job strain threshold is set for a demands score higher than 20 and a control score lower than 71; the isostrain threshold is determined from a combining score of job strain and social support lower than 24.
Time frame: One week later
Job demand / job control / social support using the Job Demand-Control-Support (JDSC) questionnaire of Karasek. JDSC assessed job demands, job control and social support through 26 items. The questionnaire measures nine items of job demands, nine items of job control and eight items of social support. Items of JDSC are scored on a four-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree. Among the 26 items, five negative statements require reverse scoring. From French data, the job strain threshold is set for a demands score higher than 20 and a control score lower than 71; the isostrain threshold is determined from a combining score of job strain and social support lower than 24.questionnaire of Karasek
Time frame: Inclusion
Effort-reward imbalance on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)
Time frame: One week later
Effort-reward imbalance on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)
Time frame: Inclusion
Effort-reward imbalance using Effort-Reward Imbalance Questionnaire (ERI). ERI assessed psychological distress and health problems that may occur when there is an imbalance between the efforts required by the work and the rewards received. We used the 46 items of the French version of the ERI model exploring efforts (six items), over commitment (eleven items), and rewards (seventeen items). Items of ERI were scored on a five-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 = disagree to 5 = agree and very disturbed. A ratio extrinsic efforts and rewards can assess the imbalance between these two dimensions. A ratio greater than one defines employees exposed to an imbalance between efforts and rewards
Time frame: One week later
Effort-reward imbalance using Effort-Reward Imbalance Questionnaire (ERI). ERI assessed psychological distress and health problems that may occur when there is an imbalance between the efforts required by the work and the rewards received. We used the 46 items of the French version of the ERI model exploring efforts (six items), over commitment (eleven items), and rewards (seventeen items). Items of ERI were scored on a five-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 = disagree to 5 = agree and very disturbed. A ratio extrinsic efforts and rewards can assess the imbalance between these two dimensions. A ratio greater than one defines employees exposed to an imbalance between efforts and rewards
Time frame: Inclusion
Work addiction on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)
Time frame: One week later
Work addiction on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)
Time frame: Inclusion
Work addiction using Work Addiction Risk Test (WART) questionnaire. The WART assesses 25 statements on a 4-point Likert scale from 1 - never true to 4 - always true. The total score ranged from 25 to 100, with higher scores reflecting higher work addiction. Scores from 25 to 56 were defined as low-risk of work addiction; from 57 to 66 as medium-risk and from 67 to 100 as high-risk .
Time frame: One week later
Work addiction using Work Addiction Risk Test (WART) questionnaire. The WART assesses 25 statements on a 4-point Likert scale from 1 - never true to 4 - always true. The total score ranged from 25 to 100, with higher scores reflecting higher work addiction. Scores from 25 to 56 were defined as low-risk of work addiction; from 57 to 66 as medium-risk and from 67 to 100 as high-risk .
Time frame: Inclusion
Life satisfaction on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)
Time frame: One week later
Life satisfaction on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)
Time frame: Inclusion
Life satisfaction using the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ). MSQ is composed of 20 items designed to measure employee job satisfaction. Items are made of a 5-point scale of satisfaction, varying from 1 "Very dissatisfied" to 5 "Very satisfied". A percentile score of 75 or higher represent a high degree of satisfaction, a percentile score of 25 or lower represent a low degree of satisfaction and scores in the middle range of percentiles (26 to 74) indicated average satisfaction.
Time frame: One week later
Life satisfaction using the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ). MSQ is composed of 20 items designed to measure employee job satisfaction. Items are made of a 5-point scale of satisfaction, varying from 1 "Very dissatisfied" to 5 "Very satisfied". A percentile score of 75 or higher represent a high degree of satisfaction, a percentile score of 25 or lower represent a low degree of satisfaction and scores in the middle range of percentiles (26 to 74) indicated average satisfaction.
Time frame: Once at inclusion
age, gender, marital status, number of children, education level
Time frame: Once at inclusion
Question "What is your profession?"
Time frame: Once at inclusion
Number of hours worked per week
Time frame: Once at inclusion
Do you work at night? Do you work weekends?
Time frame: Once at inclusion
Number of alcoholic drinks per week
Time frame: Once at inclusion
Number of cigarettes per day
Time frame: Once at inclusion
Height in cm
Time frame: Once at inclusion
Weight in kg
Time frame: Once at inclusion
Number of hours sit per day
Time frame: Once at inclusion
Number of hours of physical activity per day
Time frame: Once at inclusion
stress at work level on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)
Time frame: Once at inclusion
Ethical conflicts confrontation on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from never (0) to often(100)
Time frame: Once at inclusion
Perceived health on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from bad(0) to excellent (100)
Time frame: Once at inclusion
stress at home level on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)
Time frame: Once at inclusion
Fatigue level on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)
Time frame: Once at inclusion
Sleep quality level on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from bad(0) to excellent (100)
Time frame: Once at inclusion
mood level on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from bad(0) to excellent (100)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Other
Acronym: SoWell-VAS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06683170
Validation
Turku, Finland
View Trial DetailsNCT07580612
Artifical Intelligence, Basal Ganglia Diseases
Leuven, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT07578233
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Multiparametric
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07510360
General Anaesthesia, Postoperative Recovery
View Trial Details