Geneva University Hospital
Geneva, Geneva 14, 1211, Switzerland
NCT Number: NCT04504799
Body composition measurement is an important tool for assessing the physical condition of sick or healthy people, as well as for monitoring changes in body composition and physical performance during diet and/or training. Many people self-monitor their body composition using portable and inexpensive assessment tools, but most of them have not been tested for accuracy and precision.
This study aims to assess the accuracy and precision of a new portable impedancemeter scale to measure body composition in comparison with proven techniques, such as 4-electrode electrical bioimpedance analysis and dual X-ray absorptiometry.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–60 year
All sexes
Observational
Geneva, Geneva 14, 1211, Switzerland
This is an observational, prospective, cross-sectional study to evaluate the accuracy and precision of the new HAG-B19 in healthy Western adults. A stratified sampling method is used to recruit a heterogeneous sample of 160 subjects, covering a wide range of ages and body compositions according to gender specific BMI distributions in the population. Volunteers who signed the informed consent form are included in the study. A financial compensation of 50.- CHF is given to each participant (100.- to the 16 participants subjected to the DEXA measurements).
The body composition of each subject (FM, LBM and FM%) is assessed with sequential measurements using 3 HAG-B19 and 3 Nutriguard-M® devices (Data Input, Germany). FM% values measured by HAG-B19 are compared to values by Nutriguard-M® to assess the accuracy and precision of HAG-B19 (main objective). Intra- and inter-device variability are obtained by comparing the 3 repeated measurements and the 3 HAG-B19 devices (secondary objective). In a subgroup of 16 individuals, the FM% values measured by HAG-B19 are compared to DEXA measurements (secondary objective). Pearson correlations and Bland-Altman graphs are performed to assess the agreement of the measurements between the devices and paired t-tests are used to determine if there is a bias between the devices. The significance of the statistical analysis is fixed at p <0.05.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Healthy Caucasians/Hispanics adults who signed the informed consent form (healthy defined as no chronic disease, no hospitalisation for the last 6 months, no physical disability)
Exclusion criteria
Bio-impendance analysis
Time frame: 6 months
Comparison between HAG-B19 and Nutriguard-M measurement
Time frame: 6 months
Comparison of measurements within and between three HAG-B19 devices.
Time frame: 6 months
Comparison between HAG-B19 and DEXA in 10 percents of participants
Prof. Claude Pichard
Other
Validation of the New HAG-B19 Scale for Measuring Lean and Fat Body Masses by Comparison With Routinely Used Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry in Western Healthy Adults: The Geneva HAG-BIA Study
Acronym: HAG-BIA
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07628790
Autonomic Function, Behavior
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT05758441
Behavior, Body Composition
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07586579
Behavior, Body Composition
Palembang, South Sumatera, Indonesia
View Trial DetailsNCT07584551
Behavior, Body Composition
Turmequé, Departamento de Boyacá, Colombia
View Trial Details