Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01723956

Validation of Implementation of Cervical Dysplasia Treatment Modalities in HIV-Seropositive Women

To compare the efficacy of cryotherapy and large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) procedures for the treatment of high-grade cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN2/3) among HIV-seropositive women by follow-up VIA, cytology and Human Papillomavirus.

Hypothesis: LEEP will be more effective than cryotherapy in removing CIN 2/3 lesions in HIV positive women in South Africa

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Helen Joseph Hospital

Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2092, South Africa

About this study

Cervical cancer is the most common cancer in HIV positive women. This is due to immunosuppression and lack of organized and effective screening and treatment programs in Africa. Other screening and treatment modalities need to be evaluated in resource limited countries as there is not capacity in most of these countries to implement a cytology/histology based program. The treatment modality of cryotherapy is easy to train and perform and can be done by a nurse. LEEP requires significant training usually doctors and skills in administering local anaesthetic. This study compares the two modalities of cryotherapy vs LEEP in a randomized controlled study in HIV positive women in South Africa.

A. PRIMARY AIMS (S.A.):

  • To compare the efficacy of cryotherapy and large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) procedures for the treatment of high-grade cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN2/3) among HIV-seropositive women by follow-up VIA, cytology and HPV.
  • To determine the utility of subsequent HPV DNA testing as a marker of effective treatment following the treatment of CIN 2/3 among HIV-seropositive women.
  • To compare the safety of cryotherapy versus LLETZ in HIV seropositive women.

SECONDARY AIMS:

  • To describe HIV disease status (CD4, HIV viral load), demographics, and sexual behavior in each treatment arm (LLETZ and cryotherapy) in HIV seropositive women.
  • To determine the cervical disease recurrence rates with cryotherapy and LLETZ.
  • To evaluate the relationship between HIV status, demographics, HPV, and sexual behavior with the clearance of cervical disease at the ectocervical and endocervical margins in HIV seropositive women.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women 18-65 years of age
  • Not menstruating (if menstruating, the patient can be screened at another date)
  • Able to sign consent
  • Able to follow the study protocol
  • HIV positive (by two different criteria; either 2 different rapid HPV tests of different manufacturers, a HIV viral load ≥5,000,ELISA, Western blot documented in VICAR 1)
  • Participant with histology-proven CIN 2 or 3 disease

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnant
  • Clinically active sexually transmitted disease determined by clinical history and/or physical exam (may participate after adequate treatment by syndromic treatment management)
  • Known and previous treatment for high grade squamouse intraepithelial lesion by any method (cryotherapy, LLETZ or cone biopsy)
  • Previous hysterectomy with removal of the cervix
  • Significant medical illness/mental illness that the investigator feels would prevent the participant from complying with the protocol or place the participant at medical risk
  • Cervical dysplastic lesions that are not appropriate for cryotherapy, defined as the following:
  • Lesion is greater than ≥75% cervix
  • Lesion entering into the cervical canal and the complete lesion cannot be visualized
  • Presence of abnormal vasculature
  • Lesion bigger that the cryotherapy probe

Treatment and study plan

cryotherapy

Procedure

This is involves freezing the lesions with a cryo gun using Nitrous Oxide for 3 minutes-- wait 5 minutes and then refreezing for 3 more minutes. This procedure uses the Wallach cryogun

Other names: This is a study using Freezing with a cryogun

LEEP

Procedure

The cervix is anaesthetized with lidocaine and then a electric loop is applied to the cervical lesion which is cut with one pass. The LEEP machine used is the automatic Finesse Machine.

Other names: Loop Electric Excision Procedure

Primary outcomes

  1. Compare efficacy of cryotherapy and LEEP

    Time frame: 1 year

    To compare the efficacy of cryotherapy and large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) procedures for the treatment of high-grade cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN2/3) among HIV-seropositive women by follow-up VIA, cytology and HPV.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The ability to use Human Papillomavirus as the measure of treatment success

    Time frame: 1 year

    To determine the utility of subsequent HPV DNA testing as a marker of effective treatment following the treatment of CIN 2/3 among HIV-seropositive women.

  2. To compare the safety of cryotherapy versus LLETZ in HIV seropositive women

    Time frame: 1 month, 6 months and 12 months

    To compare the safety of cryotherapy versus LLETZ in HIV seropositive women by evaluating adverse events as measured by the Division of AIDS toxicity table 2004 (revised August 2010)

  3. Describe factors associated with successful treatment of CIN 2/3

    Time frame: 1 year

    To describe HIV disease status (CD4, HIV viral load), demographics, tissue margins and sexual behavior in each treatment arm (LLETZ and cryotherapy) in HIV seropositive women.

  4. To determine the cervical disease recurrence rates with cryotherapy and LLETZ.

    Time frame: 6 months and 12 months

    To determine the cervical disease recurrence rates with cryotherapy and LLETZ at 6 months and 12 months by colposcopy

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Witwatersrand, South Africa

Other

Registry information

Acronym: VICAR2

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Nov 8, 2012
Registry last updated
Sep 22, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.