Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00872092

Validation of Breath Tests in Diagnosing Small Bowel Bacterial Overgrowth

Normally the gastrointestinal tract is only sparsely colonized with bacteria. The normal flora of the duodenal or jejunal aspirate contains no more than 10^5 bacteria per milliliter. Small bowel bacterial overgrowth (SBBO) is defined as a pathologically increased number of bacteria or the presence of colonic flora in the proximal intestine. The reasons for this condition are manifold, ranging from diabetic neuropathy to surgical bypass. SBBO is frequent in elderly people. Therapy is targeted at correcting the underlying small bowel abnormalities that predispose to the condition and at providing appropriate antibiotic therapy. The symptoms and signs of SBBO can be reversed with this approach. However, in many patients the conditions predisposing to SBBO persist life-long, once present. This suggests that noninvasive, sensitive diagnostic tools with high specificity are required. Bacterial culture of upper intestinal content is considered the diagnostic gold standard. However, since endoscopic harvesting of duodenal or jejunal fluid is difficult and invasive, indirect tests such as breath tests have been advocated as diagnostic tools. Hydrogen breath tests are commonly employed since the substrates can be easily obtained and the measurement is simple. Hydrogen is formed when carbohydrates are fermented in the intestine. Breath hydrogen analysis allows a separation of metabolic activity of the intestinal flora from that of the host, since no known hydrogen production occurs in mammalian tissue. The hydrogen breath test most often used in routine clinical practice uses glucose. However, the utility of this test is mostly limited by its low sensitivity, because there are "nonproducers" in up to 25% of the subjects tested. The investigators have developed a stable isotope breath test using 13C-labeled lactose-ureide. Glycosyl-ureides are condensation products of reducing sugars and urea in aqueous acid. Lactose-[13C]ureide has been used to investigate oro-caecal transit time because it resists digestion by small intestinal enzymes and is hydrolyzed by bacterial enzymes in the large intestine. A number of studies have described the use of this substrate in adults and children. The aim of the present study was to investigate the lactose-[13C]ureide breath test in subjects with suspected SBBO and to compare its results with the results of the glucose hydrogen breath test. Microbiological analyses of upper intestinal bacterial cultures were used as gold standard to identify SBBO.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

University of Bonn

Bonn, 53105, Germany

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Suspected small bowel bacterial overgrowth

Exclusion criteria

  • Age < 18 years
  • Antibiotic therapy

Treatment and study plan

Stable-isotope labeled lactose ureide breath test

Other

2 g 13C-labeled lactose ureide orally

Other names: Lactosyl ureide

Primary outcomes

  1. 13CO2 enrichment in breath CO2

    Time frame: 3 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hydrogen output in breath

    Time frame: 3 hours

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Bonn

Other

Registry information

Acronym: BTO

Important dates

Study start
1997
Primary completion
1998
Study completion
1998
First posted
Mar 31, 2009
Registry last updated
Mar 31, 2009

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.