Centre Régional Metz-Thionville
Metz, 57085, France
NCT Number: NCT04915274
To assess the psychometric properties (validity, reliability and responsiveness) of the QuestOnco tool, an electronic Remote Toxicity Management System, in adult cancer patients receiving an active anti-cancer treatment.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeIn this study, a mobile phone-based remote monitoring system (QuestOnco application) was developed in order to enable the 'real-time' monitoring of patients' symptoms through use of ePROMs. In order to establish if this new application accurately and reliably identifies the anti-cancer treatment related symptoms, its psychometric properties (validity, reliability and responsiveness) have to be assessed.
Hypotheses:
This study will assess the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the QuestOnco in a cohort of patients receiving anti-cancer treatments. The external validity will be directly compared to PRO-CTCAE (Patient-Reported Outcome Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) and to EORTC QLC-QC30 questionnaire.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients will be advised that they can still use their QuestOnco handset if they are hospitalized only for a treatment-related toxicity.
Time frame: At the end of study completion (Week 6)
PRO-CTCAE The convergent validity will be evaluated by the correlation between the QuestOnco and the weekly paper form of the PRO-CTCAE questionnaire.
PRO-CTCAE is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement system developed to evaluate symptomatic toxicity in patients on cancer clinical trials. It was designed to be used as a companion to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) External Web Site Policy, the standard lexicon for adverse event reporting in cancer clinical trials.
The PRO-CTCAE Item Library includes 124 items representing 78 symptomatic toxicities drawn from the CTCAE. PRO-CTCAE items evaluate the symptom attributes of frequency, severity, interference, amount, presence/absence. Each symptomatic AE is assessed by 1-3 attributes.
PRO-CTCAE responses are scored from 0 to 4 (minimum/maximum).
Time frame: At the end of the study completion: Phase I (Day 7)
Semi-structured cognitive interviews:
Interviews will be conducted to evaluate patients' comprehension of the QuestOnco application items. Items will be modified and restested if more than 2 patients manifest cognitive difficulties. The item modifications will be conducted during focus groups gathering experts including Emergency department practitioners, General practitioner, Oncologists, Pharmacists, and Methodologists. This procedure will be repeated 3 times a maximum for a total of 30 patients.
Time frame: At the end of the study completion (Week 6)
The known-groups validity will be assessed by comparing the QuestOnco items between patients with high and low performance status using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0-1 vs 2-4 (minimum vs maximum).
Time frame: At the end of study completion (Week 6)
Calculation of the time spent (minutes) in consultation with the Oncologist using QuestOnco application fill form
Time frame: At the end of the study completion (Week 6)
Calculation of the number (percent) of appointments actually realized using QuestOnco application fill form
Time frame: At the end of the study completion (Week 6)
Calculation of the number (percent) of the automatic telephone alert calls to the regional Emergency service using QuestOnco application fill form
Time frame: At the end of the study completion (Week 6)
Calculation of the number (percent) of scheduled consultation based on the statement of reported-toxicity score (symptom severity from grades II to IV) of cancer patients using electronic mobile QuestOnco application.
Time frame: At the end of the study completion (Week 1 and 6)
The patients' quality of life will be assessed using EORTC QLC-QC30 questionnaire The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item core-cancer-specific questionnaire-integrating system for assessing the health-related QOL of cancer patients participating in international clinical trials. The questionnaire incorporates five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting), a global health and QOL scale, and single items for the assessment of additional symptoms commonly reported by cancer patients (e.g., dyspnea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, and diarrhea), as well as the perceived financial impact of the disease and treatment. All items are scored on 4-point Likert scales, ranging from 1 ('not at all') to 4 ('very much'), with the exception of two items in the global health/QOL scale which use modified 7-point linear analog scales.
Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville
Other
Validation of an Electronic Remote Toxicity Management System in Adult Cancer Patients Receiving an Active Anti-cancer Treatment
Acronym: eRToMSy
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05364372
Behavior, Cancer
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01445483
Brain Diseases, Brain Metastasis
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00038727
Body Weight, CVD
Rockville, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03556384
Brain Diseases, Cancer
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial Details