Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01981993

Validation of a Urinary Biomarker as Diagnostic Tool for AKI in Sepsis

BACKGROUND:

Early diagnosis and prognostication of acute kidney injury in patients with sepsis is key to further our understanding this disease and in the evaluation of new interventions for this condition. Many urinary biomarkers have been proposed, but no single one seems to consistently provide additional information on top of clinical and routine biochemical parameters. Some authors have proposed to use a panel of urinary biomarkers to increase the accuracy However, this approach has so far not been tested in a large group of patients with sepsis. In addition, newer and more performant analytical techniques have been developed that warrant testing in the clinical field.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

At least 150 consecutive patients admitted to a tertiary care intensive care unit (ICU) with sepsis will be included. After bladder catheterisation, urinary samples will be collected at time points 0, 4 hours and 24 hours after admission, and further daily on day 1-5. Samples will be immediately centrifuged and frozen at -80°C until analysis. Samples will be extracted by removing larger proteins (>20kDa) and de-salting step prior to mass spectrometry analysis. Investigators will use capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-MS) to assess urinary peptides predictive of AKI: 20 peptides constituting the AKI marker pattern previously established from a cohort of ICU patients. Simultaneously, samples will be analysed using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), an alternative platform to CE-MS, which is currently being developed for routine ICU use. A proof of concept of the technique involved has been successfully applied to a set of urine samples from patients diagnosed with diabetes presenting normoalbuminuria (controls) and macroalbuminuria (cases).

Clinical, demographic and biochemical data of patients will be collected during the first 5 days.

PATIENT OUTCOME

* in the short term:

* development of acute kidney injury according to RIFLE criteria * death * need for renal replacement therapy during ICU stay * on the longer term

* death * need for renal replacement therapy * estimated glomerular filtration rate as calculated by MDRD at 3 months, 1 year and 2 years.

Using cut-offs , Receiver Operating Characteristics curves, negative and positive predictive value will be used to describe diagnostic performance of the biomarker panel alone, or in combination with basic clinical and/or routine biochemical parameters. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression for death will be used to evaluate prognostication value of the biomarker set.

In addition, new discriminatory cut-offs of proteomic patterns as determined by more recent proteomic analysis techniques will be determined in a training set (half of the cohort) and validated in the other half of the cohort. Using the MALDI-TOF MS platform, investigators will assess urinary peptides that were predictive of AKI in a training set (ca. 75 patients) with good diagnostic performance of the marker panel (accuracy above 0.8) . Performance of the biomarker panel will be assessed in a blinded test set of ca. 75 patients to evaluate validity of the model in AKI detection.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Ghent University Hospital

Ghent, 9000, Belgium

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • sepsis at ICU

Exclusion criteria

  • na

Treatment and study plan

Urinary proteomic analysis

Biological

Primary outcomes

  1. development of acute kidney injury according to RIFLE criteria

    Time frame: at 3 months after inclusion

Secondary outcomes

  1. change in need for renal replacement therapy

    Time frame: at 3 months - 1 year and 2 year after inclusion

  2. change in estimated glomerular filtration rate as calculated by MDRD

    Time frame: at 3 months, 1 year and 2 years after inclusion

  3. death

    Time frame: 1 year and 2 years after inclusion

    Using cut-offs determined by Metzger(1) et al, Receiver Operating Characteristics curves, negative and positive predictive value will be used to describe diagnostic performance of the biomarker panel alone, or in combination with basic clinical and/or routine biochemical parameters. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression for death will be used to evaluate prognostication value of the biomarker set.

    In addition, new discriminatory cut-offs of proteomic patterns as determined by more recent proteomic analysis techniques will be determined in a training set (half of the cohort) and validated in the other half of the cohort. Using the MALDI-TOF MS platform, we will assess urinary peptides that were predictive of AKI in a training set (ca. 75 patients) with good diagnostic performance of the marker panel (accuracy above 0.8) . Performance of the biomarker panel will be assessed in a blinded test set of ca. 75 patients to evaluate validity of the model in AKI detection.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Ghent

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Value of a Urinary Biomarker Set Obtained by a Proteomics Approach to Predict Acute Kidney Injury and Prognosis in Sepsis Patients: a Prospective Cohort Study

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2011
First posted
Nov 13, 2013
Registry last updated
May 3, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.