Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07120789

Validation of a Patient Knowledge Questionnaire for Pulmonary Hypertension

This methodological study aims to develop and validate a questionnaire named for the Assessment of Patient Knowledge in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. The study will be conducted in four phases: (1) questionnaire development based on guidelines and literature; (2) content validation by expert judges; (3) semantic validation with patients; and (4) psychometric testing in a sample of up to 200 patients with confirmed pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).

In addition to validation, the study will collect clinical and functional data from medical records, including risk stratification using the COMPERA 2.0 method The final instrument is expected to support patient education strategies and contribute to improved clinical management of PAH.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Instituto do Coração (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo

São Paulo, 05403-900, Brazil

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Caio Fernandes, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+55 11 2661 5034

About this study

This is a methodological study with a quantitative approach, developed in four main phases, aimed at constructing and validating a questionnaire to assess the knowledge of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The study will be conducted at a reference outpatient center in Brazil and will follow established methodological guidelines for the development and validation of health-related instruments.

Phase 1 - Questionnaire Development:

The initial version of the questionnaire, will be created based on the 2022 ESC/ERS Guidelines for PAH, a review of the scientific literature on patient knowledge in chronic diseases, and validated instruments in other conditions (e.g., chronic kidney disease, inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis). Items will cover the following domains: basic concepts, signs and symptoms, diagnosis and exams, available treatments and their mechanisms, adherence and self-care, and side effect management. Items will be multiple-choice with the option "I don't know".

Phase 2 - Content Validation:

At least five expert judges with experience in PAH, health education, and instrument development will evaluate each item for clarity, relevance, representativeness, and appropriateness using a 4-point Likert scale. The Content Validity Index (CVI) will be calculated for each item (I-CVI) and for the total instrument (S-CVI). Items with I-CVI ≥ 0.78 will be retained.

Phase 3 - Semantic Validation:

A sample of at least 10 patients diagnosed with PAH will be asked to complete the questionnaire while verbalizing their understanding ("think-aloud" technique). Revisions will be made based on participant feedback to ensure clarity and comprehension.

Phase 4 - Pilot Study and Psychometric Analysis:

The refined questionnaire will be applied to a sample of up to 200 patients with confirmed PAH. Psychometric analysis will include internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and, if applicable, test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient - ICC). Exploratory factor analysis may be used to assess internal structure.

In addition to validation, the study will collect clinical and functional data from medical records, including:

Risk stratification using COMPERA 2.0 methodology

The relationship between knowledge scores (SAVOIR) and these outcomes will be analyzed, aiming to explore whether higher patient knowledge is associated with better risk status, lower hospitalization rates, and higher quality of life.

This instrument is expected to help identify educational gaps, support targeted health education strategies, and contribute to improved clinical outcomes and shared decision-making in the care of PAH patients.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older
  • Confirmed diagnosis of Group 1 Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH)
  • Ability to read and understand the questionnaire language
  • Provided informed consent to participate in the study
  • For expert judges (content validation phase): professionals with recognized expertise in pulmonary hypertension, with academic or clinical experience in the field

Exclusion criteria

  • Cognitive, visual, or auditory impairments that hinder questionnaire comprehension
  • Refusal to participate or withdrawal of informed consent
  • Inability to complete the questionnaire due to clinical instability

Treatment and study plan

Application of Patient Knowledge Questionnaire on Pulmonary Hypertension

Other

Participants will complete one version of the SAVOIR questionnaire, developed to assess patient knowledge about pulmonary arterial hypertension. Depending on the study phase, participants will contribute to content validation (expert judges), semantic validation (patients), or psychometric validation (patients). In the final phase, additional data including risk stratification (COMPERA 2.0) will be collected for correlational analysis.

Primary outcomes

  1. Content Validity Index (CVI) of the Questionnaire Items

    Time frame: 4 weeks after expert panel review

    Proportion of agreement among expert judges regarding the relevance and clarity of each item. Items with CVI ≥ 0.80 will be considered valid.

  2. Semantic Clarity Rating by Patients

    Time frame: 2 weeks after patient interview

    Assessment of the clarity and comprehension of each item by patients using a structured form. Items with ≥ 85% of patients rating them as clear or very clear will be considered semantically valid.

  3. Internal Consistency of the Questionnaire (Cronbach's Alpha)

    Time frame: 4 weeks after questionnaire completion

    Psychometric evaluation of the final version of the SAVOIR questionnaire using Cronbach's alpha. A coefficient ≥ 0.70 will be considered acceptable. The analysis will be conducted in a sample of up to 200 patients.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Test-Retest Reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient - ICC)

    Time frame: 2 weeks after first questionnaire administration

    Stability of the questionnaire scores over time will be assessed by reapplying the instrument after 1 to 2 weeks in a subsample of patients. ICC ≥ 0.80 will be considered acceptable.

  2. Completion Rate and Acceptability of the Questionnaire

    Time frame: At the time of first questionnaire administration (Day 1)

    Percentage of participants who complete the questionnaire without missing data and report that the items are clear and easy to understand.

  3. 6. Association Between questionnaire Score and Risk Stratification (COMPERA 2.0)

    Time frame: Within 4 weeks of questionnaire completion

    Association between total DICTA score and patient risk status based on the COMPERA 2.0 stratification tool.

  4. Association Between questionnaire Score and Number of PAH-related Hospitalizations

    Time frame: Within 4 weeks of questionnaire completion

    Correlation between questionnaire score and number of PAH-related hospitalizations in the 12 months prior to questionnaire administration.

  5. Association Between the questionnaire Score (being developed) and Quality of Life Measures (EMPHASIS-10)

    Time frame: Within 4 weeks of questionnaire completion

    Association between questionnaire score and scores on quality of life tools.

  6. Association Between Patient Knowledge and Treatment Adherence using Martin-Bayarre-Grau (MBG Score)

    Time frame: Within 4 weeks of questionnaire completion

    Assess the association between the questionnaire scores and treatment adherence, as measured by the Martin-Bayarre-Grau (MBG) scale. The goal is to explore whether higher knowledge levels are correlated with greater adherence to treatment in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Caio Fernandes Principal Investigato, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+55 11 2661 5034

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Content, Semantic, and Psychometric Validation of a Patient Knowledge Questionnaire for Pulmonary Hypertension

Acronym: SAVOIR

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Aug 13, 2025
Registry last updated
Mar 10, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.