Instituto do Coração (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
São Paulo, 05403-900, Brazil
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07120789
This methodological study aims to develop and validate a questionnaire named for the Assessment of Patient Knowledge in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. The study will be conducted in four phases: (1) questionnaire development based on guidelines and literature; (2) content validation by expert judges; (3) semantic validation with patients; and (4) psychometric testing in a sample of up to 200 patients with confirmed pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).
In addition to validation, the study will collect clinical and functional data from medical records, including risk stratification using the COMPERA 2.0 method The final instrument is expected to support patient education strategies and contribute to improved clinical management of PAH.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
São Paulo, 05403-900, Brazil
Location status: Recruiting
This is a methodological study with a quantitative approach, developed in four main phases, aimed at constructing and validating a questionnaire to assess the knowledge of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The study will be conducted at a reference outpatient center in Brazil and will follow established methodological guidelines for the development and validation of health-related instruments.
Phase 1 - Questionnaire Development:
The initial version of the questionnaire, will be created based on the 2022 ESC/ERS Guidelines for PAH, a review of the scientific literature on patient knowledge in chronic diseases, and validated instruments in other conditions (e.g., chronic kidney disease, inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis). Items will cover the following domains: basic concepts, signs and symptoms, diagnosis and exams, available treatments and their mechanisms, adherence and self-care, and side effect management. Items will be multiple-choice with the option "I don't know".
Phase 2 - Content Validation:
At least five expert judges with experience in PAH, health education, and instrument development will evaluate each item for clarity, relevance, representativeness, and appropriateness using a 4-point Likert scale. The Content Validity Index (CVI) will be calculated for each item (I-CVI) and for the total instrument (S-CVI). Items with I-CVI ≥ 0.78 will be retained.
Phase 3 - Semantic Validation:
A sample of at least 10 patients diagnosed with PAH will be asked to complete the questionnaire while verbalizing their understanding ("think-aloud" technique). Revisions will be made based on participant feedback to ensure clarity and comprehension.
Phase 4 - Pilot Study and Psychometric Analysis:
The refined questionnaire will be applied to a sample of up to 200 patients with confirmed PAH. Psychometric analysis will include internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and, if applicable, test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient - ICC). Exploratory factor analysis may be used to assess internal structure.
In addition to validation, the study will collect clinical and functional data from medical records, including:
Risk stratification using COMPERA 2.0 methodology
The relationship between knowledge scores (SAVOIR) and these outcomes will be analyzed, aiming to explore whether higher patient knowledge is associated with better risk status, lower hospitalization rates, and higher quality of life.
This instrument is expected to help identify educational gaps, support targeted health education strategies, and contribute to improved clinical outcomes and shared decision-making in the care of PAH patients.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants will complete one version of the SAVOIR questionnaire, developed to assess patient knowledge about pulmonary arterial hypertension. Depending on the study phase, participants will contribute to content validation (expert judges), semantic validation (patients), or psychometric validation (patients). In the final phase, additional data including risk stratification (COMPERA 2.0) will be collected for correlational analysis.
Time frame: 4 weeks after expert panel review
Proportion of agreement among expert judges regarding the relevance and clarity of each item. Items with CVI ≥ 0.80 will be considered valid.
Time frame: 2 weeks after patient interview
Assessment of the clarity and comprehension of each item by patients using a structured form. Items with ≥ 85% of patients rating them as clear or very clear will be considered semantically valid.
Time frame: 4 weeks after questionnaire completion
Psychometric evaluation of the final version of the SAVOIR questionnaire using Cronbach's alpha. A coefficient ≥ 0.70 will be considered acceptable. The analysis will be conducted in a sample of up to 200 patients.
Time frame: 2 weeks after first questionnaire administration
Stability of the questionnaire scores over time will be assessed by reapplying the instrument after 1 to 2 weeks in a subsample of patients. ICC ≥ 0.80 will be considered acceptable.
Time frame: At the time of first questionnaire administration (Day 1)
Percentage of participants who complete the questionnaire without missing data and report that the items are clear and easy to understand.
Time frame: Within 4 weeks of questionnaire completion
Association between total DICTA score and patient risk status based on the COMPERA 2.0 stratification tool.
Time frame: Within 4 weeks of questionnaire completion
Correlation between questionnaire score and number of PAH-related hospitalizations in the 12 months prior to questionnaire administration.
Time frame: Within 4 weeks of questionnaire completion
Association between questionnaire score and scores on quality of life tools.
Time frame: Within 4 weeks of questionnaire completion
Assess the association between the questionnaire scores and treatment adherence, as measured by the Martin-Bayarre-Grau (MBG) scale. The goal is to explore whether higher knowledge levels are correlated with greater adherence to treatment in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Other
Content, Semantic, and Psychometric Validation of a Patient Knowledge Questionnaire for Pulmonary Hypertension
Acronym: SAVOIR
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06998329
Cardiovascular Diseases, Disease
São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT07487441
Cardiovascular Diseases, Hypertension
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07318597
Cardiovascular Diseases, Hypertension
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07013149
Hypertension, Pulmonary, Lung Diseases
São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial Details