NCT Number: NCT02589093
Validation of a Nociception Monitor in Healthy Volunteers
Anesthesiology daily practice consists in management of sedation, immobility and analgesia. The monitoring of this last component remains largely based on indirect signs with poor sensitivity and specificity such as heart rate and blood pressure. Accordingly, there is an increased demand for more accurate analgesia monitors. Several parameters have been studied in the recent years such as spectral entropy, skin conductance, pupillometry or heart rate variability (HRV). The HRV is influenced by the balance of sympathetic and parasympathetic tones, and is therefore influenced by pain and analgesia.
MDoloris Medical Systems SAS, located in Lille, France, had developed a monitor called PhysioDoloris (TM) that uses an analysis of the HRV to generate a clinically useable index, the Analgesia-Nociception Index (ANI). The ANI varies from 0 to 100, a lower number indicating less parasympathetic tone. It has been shown in previous studies under general anesthesia to decrease at the moment of surgical incision and pneumoperitoneum inflation and to increase with opioids administration.
The purpose of this study is to show a correlation between the variation of the ANI with pain scores in awake healthy volunteers who are subjected to standardized painful stimuli of increasing intensity. The investigators hypothesize that an increasing pain score will correlate with decreasing ANI values.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year–80 year
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
About this study
See above
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Volunteers aged 18-80 years old
Exclusion criteria
- Heart disease
- Neurological disease
- Allergy to cutaneous electrodes
- Chronic pain and/or chronic analgesics consumption
- Medication affecting the autonomic nervous system
- Inability to understand a numeric rating scale (NRS)
Treatment and study plan
Primary outcomes
-
ANI index values during increasing intensities of moderately painful electrical stimulation at the forearm level.
Time frame: Assessed during the entire cycle of stimulation (approx. 30 min)
The ANI is an index that can vary from 0 (maximum pain) to 100 (no pain) in humans. The primary objective of this study will be to record the ANI values all along the time period of the clinical evaluation, while the subjects are submitted to standardized electrical stimulation going from 0 mA (no stimulation) to a maximum of 25 mA (or less according to the subject tolerance).
Each stimulation lasts for 3 minutes. During these 3 minutes the ANI is electronically recorded automatically but the Physiodoloris device. The quantitavive value of the index is then analyzed during each stimulation and for all the stimulations.
This will allow to evaluate whether it exists any correlation between the ANI values and the intensity of the electrical stimulation.
Secondary outcomes
-
ANI correlation with Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) of pain
Time frame: Assessed during the entire cycle of stimulation (approx. 30 min)
NRS and ANI absolute values will be recorded all along the study duration (approx. 30min). This will allow to evaluate a likely correlation between the ANI absolute values and the NRS values.
-
Heart rate correlation with ANI
Time frame: Assessed during the entire cycle of stimulation (approx. 30 min)
ANI values and HR are recorded for the whole duration of the study. A correlation between these two criteria will be evaluated to know if HR increases (more pain) when ANI decreases (more pain).
-
Blood pressure correlation with ANI
Time frame: Assessed during the entire cycle of stimulation (approx. 30 min)
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital
Other
Registry information
Important dates
- Study start
- 2014
- Primary completion
- 2014
- Study completion
- 2014
- First posted
- Oct 28, 2015
- Registry last updated
- Oct 28, 2015
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Does Patient Testimonial Improve the Pain Relief Derived From a Brief Intervention
NCT07335159
Acute Pain, Agnosia
Tallahassee, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsAssociation of Expectations and Pain Relief After Diagnostic Nerve Blocks
NCT05733039
Agnosia, Expectations
Bern, Canton of Bern, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsFemoral Nerve Block Versus Adductor Canal Nerve Block for Peri-Operative Analgesia Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction: Evaluation of Post-operative Pain and Strength
NCT03033589
Agnosia, Nervous System Diseases
Detroit, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsEvaluating The Efficacy Of Pecs II Blockade Compared To Local Anesthetic Infiltration In Controlling Postoperative Pain In Patients Undergoing Oncologic Breast Surgery Under Opioid Free/Sparing Anesthesia.
NCT06889870
Agnosia, Anesthesia
Itabira, Minas Gerais, Brazil
View Trial Details