Kasr Alainy medical school
Cairo, 12151, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT03081442
Groups of study:
120 candidates for Cu T 380A IUD insertion were enrolled in the study. They were divided into two groups: Group 1: Sixty women received 600 micrograms of misoprostol vaginally as deep as possible six hours before IUD insertion.
Group 2: Sixty women received the placebo vaginally. The placebo and misoprostol were put in 120 numbered closed envelopes according to the table of random numbers and an envelope was allocated to each patient accordingly.
Methodology:
All patients were subjected to the following:
(i) Complete history taking (ii) Proper counseling: (iv) Examination: (v) 600ug misoprostol (3tablets Misotac®, ( Sigma Pharmaceutical Industries, Egypt )or placebo were administered Vaginally as deep as possible 6 hours before insertion of the IUD by gynecologist .
(vi) Insertion of IUD: (TCu-380A®,Pregna International Ltd, India ) After full history taken , Proper counseling, Informed consent is taken from each patients, examination ( general , abdominal and pelvic )to exclude any pathology .
A careful bimanual examination was done prior to IUD insertion. The cervix was exposed by introducing a vaginal speculum, the cervix and vaginal vault were cleaned with povidone- iodine solution.
The Next step was to sound and measure the depth of the uterus. The IUD was folded into the insertion tube immediately prior to insertion. The cervix was grasped with a tenaculum, and gently pulled downward to straighten the angle of flection.
The insertion tube was advanced into the uterus to the correct depth as marked on the tube by a sliding plastic flange.
The outer sheath of the insert was withdrawn a short distance to release the arms of the T and was then gently pushed inward again to elevate the opened T against the fundus of uterus .
The inserter tube was then removed. Then strings were cut to project about 2-4 cm from the external cervical os.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me19 year–44 year
Female
Interventional
Phase 4
Cairo, 12151, Egypt
Groups of study:
120 candidates for Cu T 380A IUD insertion were enrolled in the study. They were divided into two groups: Group 1: Sixty women received 600 micrograms of misoprostol vaginally as deep as possible six hours before IUD insertion.
Group 2: Sixty women received the placebo vaginally. The placebo and misoprostol were put in 120 numbered closed envelopes according to the table of random numbers and an envelope was allocated to each patient accordingly.
Methods of randomization:
To insure that everyone had an equal chance of participation, randomization was guided by table of random numbers using computer generated system(SPSS: windous version8) (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA) double blinding technique was used thus; the investigator and the patient didn't know the group to which the patient was allocated.
Methodology:
All patients were subjected to the following:
(i) Complete history taking:
(iii) Consent: Informed consent is taken from each patients . (iv) Examination:
(v) 600ug misoprostol (3tablets Misotac®, ( Sigma Pharmaceutical Industries, Egypt )or placebo ( stugeron®, Mina Pharm. under licence Janssen Pharmaceutica, Egypt ) were administered Vaginally as deep as possible 6 hours before insertion of the IUD by gynecologist .
(vi) Insertion of IUD: (TCu-380A®,Pregna International Ltd, India ) After full history taken , Proper counseling, Informed consent is taken from each patients, examination ( general , abdominal and pelvic )to exclude any pathology .
A careful bimanual examination was done prior to IUD insertion. The cervix was exposed by introducing a vaginal speculum, the cervix and vaginal vault were cleaned with povidone- iodine solution.
The Next step was to sound and measure the depth of the uterus. The IUD was folded into the insertion tube immediately prior to insertion. The cervix was grasped with a tenaculum, and gently pulled downward to straighten the angle of flection.
The insertion tube was advanced into the uterus to the correct depth as marked on the tube by a sliding plastic flange.
The outer sheath of the insert was withdrawn ashort distance to release the arms of the T and was then gently pushed inward again to elevate the opened T against the fundus of uterus .
The inserter tube was then removed. Then strings were cut to project about 2-4 cm from the external cervical os.
Post insertion instructions:
Palpation of strings should be performed monthly by the patient to verify continuing presence of the IUD after each menstrual flow. Caution the patient that the first 2 menses are typically heavier.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
600 micrograms of misoprostol vaginally as deep as possible six hours before IUD insertion
Other names: cytotec
bimanual examination. The cervix was exposed by introducing a vaginal speculum, the cervix and vaginal vault were cleaned with povidone- iodine solution.
The Next step was to sound The IUD was folded into the insertion tube immediately prior to insertion. The cervix was grasped with a tenaculum, and gently pulled downward The insertion tube was advanced into the uterus to the correct depth as marked on the tube by a sliding plastic flange.
The outer sheath of the insert was withdrawn ashort distance to release the arms of the T and was then gently pushed inward again to elevate the opened T against the fundus of uterus .
Other names: TCu-380A®,Pregna International Ltd, India
Time frame: At time of insertion
Pain scores were measured by Visual analogue scale (VAS) consists of 10 cm horizontal straight line with 2 ends At 0 end there was no pain and at 10 there was a severe pain
Time frame: At time of insertion
Difficulty of IUD insertion was measured by a 10-point scale, on which 0 represented an extremely easy, and 10 an extremely difficult insertion
Time frame: from time of administration till insertion
abdominal cramps, headache, nausea, diarrhea and fever
Cairo University
Other
Benefits of Use of 600 Microgram Misoprostol Vaginally Prior To Insertion Of An Intrauterine Device in Patients With Cesarean Scar: A Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07264933
Cesarean Section Complications, Contraceptive Device; Complications
Banhā, Qalyubia Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06000423
Bleeding, Contraceptive Device; Complications
Portland, Oregon, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03281564
Contraceptive Device; Complications, Quality of Life
Bron, France
View Trial DetailsNCT03438682
Contraception, Contraceptive Device; Complications
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial Details