Texas Tech University Health Scince Center El Paso
El Paso, Texas, 79905, United States
NCT Number: NCT04348357
The investigators propose a pilot project in which enrolled patients undergoing major gynecologic surgery will be randomized to either a traditional office postoperative visit or a telemedicine postoperative visit. The two groups will then be compared on a variety of metrics including clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction and time.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–60 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
El Paso, Texas, 79905, United States
Project title: Utilizing telemedicine for delivery of postoperative care following minimally-invasive gynecologic surgery: A randomized controlled trial
Principal Investigator: Steven Radtke MD FACOG Co-Investigators: Randle Umeh MD Research Associate: Martha Chavez, MPA Biostatistician: Zuber Mulla, Ph.D., Professor Affiliations: Texas Tech University Health Science Center El Paso, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine
Background:
The wide-spread use of minimally invasive techniques in gynecologic surgery has brought several tangible benefits to patients including faster-recovery times, shorter hospital stays, decreased risk of long term complications, to name a few. 1-3 Technological advances such as the development of robotic assistance have allowed to further expand the number of cases that can be performed via a minimally invasive approach.4 The shift has been such that the landscape regarding operative routes in gynecologic surgery has completely reversed, with now the majority of cases being performed laparoscopically. 5 Although much has changed intraoperatively, the surrounding structure of an operative has lagged. Specifically, preoperative and post-operative visits are still conducted in a similar way than how it was done 20 years ago. Despite leaps in technology, the field of gynecologic surgery has been slow to widely implement these advances into perioperative practice. One of the specific areas of opportunity is the postoperative visit. It is common practice in the majority of fields to have a visit with the patient approximately 2 weeks after surgery. The objective of this visit is to evaluate how the patient has been progressing, examine the wound site(s), and discuss pathology results from any specimens that were removed during the procedure.
The logistics of this visit involve blocking a time-slot in an established clinic day. The patient is required to transport herself to the clinic site. Once checked-in, there may be a waiting period before being placed in a room for the practitioner to conduct the visit. Once the visit is started, as long as there are no issues, the duration of the interaction may range on average between 3-7 minutes.
Despite these visits being short and usually straight-forward, the invested time that patients have to dedicate is substantially greater than the actual interaction with the clinician. Furthermore, because of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery, many patients have already returned to work by the time of the postoperative visit which may result in a disruption of their daily work schedule.
The ubiquitousness of high-speed internet and mobile phones have allowed for the field of telemedicine to thrive in recent years.6,7 Although wide-spread application of this modality has not been implemented in the field of gynecologic surgery, other areas such as urology and pediatrics have successfully implemented telemedicine programs, specifically for postoperative patients, yielding promising results. 8,9 The investigators propose a pilot project in which enrolled patients undergoing major gynecologic surgery will be randomized to either a traditional office postoperative visit or a telemedicine postoperative visit. The two groups will then be compared on a variety of metrics including clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction and time.
Objectives
Hypothesis Patient satisfaction will be greater in the telemedicine group. The total time invested will be decreased. There will be no difference in visits to the emergency department or unrecognized postoperative complications
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A video-call application hosted by Texas Tech University Health Science Center El Paso and easily accessible from mobile phones or video-enabled PCs will be used (webex teams)
Patient comes to the office to receive routine postoperative care
Time frame: 1 month after surgery (1-2 weeks after postoperative visit)
General satisfaction component from PSQ-18 (Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18). Ranges from 1 to 5, with 5 being the maximum score (favorable), and 1 being the minimum score (unfavorable).
Time frame: 1 month after surgery (1-2 weeks after postoperative visit)
Technical Quality component from PSQ-18 (Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18). Ranges from 1 to 5, with 5 being the maximum score (favorable), and 1 being the minimum score (unfavorable)
Time frame: 1 month after surgery (1-2 weeks after postoperative visit)
Interpersonal manner component from PSQ-18 (Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18). Ranges from 1 to 5, with 5 being the maximum score (favorable), and 1 being the minimum score (unfavorable)
Time frame: 1 month after surgery (1-2 weeks after postoperative visit)
Communication component from PSQ-18 (Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18). Ranges from 1 to 5, with 5 being the maximum score (favorable), and 1 being the minimum score (unfavorable)
Time frame: 1 month after surgery (1-2 weeks after postoperative visit)
"Time spent with doctor" component from PSQ-18 (Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18). Ranges from 1 to 5, with 5 being the maximum score (favorable), and 1 being the minimum score (unfavorable)
Time frame: 1 month after surgery (1-2 weeks after postoperative visit)
"Accessibility and convenience" component from PSQ-18 (Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18). Ranges from 1 to 5, with 5 being the maximum score (favorable), and 1 being the minimum score (unfavorable)
Time frame: Measured at the time of postoperative visit, which occurred 2-3 weeks after surgery
Time that the actual postoperative encounter took, originally to be measured in seconds, and then rounded to the nearest minute for reporting. This is measured at the time of visit by research staff using a stop-watch.
Time frame: 30 days after surgery
Number of visits to the emergency department occurring after the postoperative visit, within 30 days of the surgery
Time frame: 30 days after surgery
Number of phone-calls made to office for postoperative complaints occurring after postoperative visit, within 30 days of the surgery
Time frame: 1 month after surgery (1-2 weeks after postoperative visit)
Patient estimate of the time it took them to complete the postoperative visit, including transportation to and from the clinic (if randomized to office visit group). Measured in minutes (increments of 5)
Time frame: 1 month after surgery (1-2 weeks after postoperative visit)
Participants who responded YES when asked during the final interview (1-2 weeks after postoperative visit) if they would've switched groups if given the chance.
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso
Other
Utilizing Telemedicine for Delivery of Postoperative Care Following Minimally-invasive Gynecologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Acronym: Telemedicine
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06861959
Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery, Mechanical Ventilation
Istanbul, Üsküdar, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT01534416
Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery, Neurologic Manifestations
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01379313
Adnexal Diseases, Connective Tissue Diseases
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT07264855
Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery, Neurologic Manifestations
Istanbul, Bakirkoy, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details