University of Reading
Reading, Berkshire, RG6 6AL, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT03346746
This study provides participants with two diets that vary in their glycaemic index values (low vs. high), whilst also measuring cognitive performance and mood.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–25 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Reading, Berkshire, RG6 6AL, United Kingdom
Therefore, the current study introduces cognitive testing into study procedures. Participants will consume the favourable and unfavourable conditions (each containing three meals) on separate days following a crossover, randomised, couterbalanced design. The primary dependent variable is cognitive function, whilst secondary measures include glucose and mood. It is hypothesised that the favourable meal profile will be associated with cognitive and physiological benefits relative to the unfavourable meal profile.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
This intervention was a diet that provided participants with three meals with a low GI value. These meals were breakfast (9am), lunch (midday) and a snack (3pm).
This intervention was a diet that provided participants with three meals with a high GI value. These meals were breakfast (9am), lunch (midday) and a snack (3pm).
Time frame: This was tested 9 times a day, with two days, giving a total of 18 times. Each battery of four tasks lasted approximately 15 minutes
A participants performance over four cognitive tasks
Time frame: This was measured 23 times a day, for two days, giving a total of 46 times
Glucose concentration levels
Time frame: This takes approximately 5 minutes to complete. Participants were tested six times a day. There were two test days. Giving a total of 12 times, or approximately 60 minutes of mood scale completion.
This was comprised of three mood sub-factors; alertness, anxiety, contentment. The VAS provides participants with 16 lines (100mm in length). At each end of every line are two words opposite in meaning, for example 'alert' and 'drowsy'. A participant marks each line closer to the word they feel at that current time. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum is 100, measured in millimetres.
Time frame: This takes approximately 30 seconds to complete. Participants were tested six times a day. There were two test days. Giving a total of 12 times, or approximately 6 minutes overall.
This was measured on a custom Visual Analogue Scale. Participants were presented with a 100mm line. At one end the word 'sleepy' appeared, and at the other end 'not sleepy' was present. Participants indicated how sleepy they felt by marking the line closer to the word they currently felt. Scores fell between 0 and 100.
Time frame: This takes approximately 30 seconds to complete. Participants were tested six times a day. There were two test days. Giving a total of 12 times, or approximately 6 minutes overall.
This was measured on a custom Visual Analogue Scale. Participants were presented with a 100mm line. At one end the word 'hungry' appeared, and at the other end 'not hungry' was present. Participants indicated how hungry they felt by marking the line closer to the word they currently felt. Scores fell between 0 and 100.
Time frame: This takes approximately 30 seconds to complete. Participants were tested six times a day. There were two test days. Giving a total of 12 times, or approximately 6 minutes overall.
This was measured on a custom Visual Analogue Scale. Participants were presented with a 100mm line. At one end the word 'full' appeared, and at the other end 'not full' was present. Participants indicated how full they felt by marking the line closer to the word they currently felt. Scores fell between 0 and 100.
Matthew Grout
Other
Utilizing GI: Exploring an Optimum Glycaemic Profile for Cognitive Function Across the Day in Healthy Individuals
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07438236
Behavior, Cognitive Performance
Vila Nova de Famalicão, Braga District, Portugal
View Trial DetailsNCT07126717
Cognitive Performance, Mood
Tafira Baja, Las Palmas, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT06890962
Blood Pressure, Cognitive Performance
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03567343
Cognitive Performance, Mood
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details