Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03765203

Utility of a Novel Dd-cfDNA Test to Detect Injury in Renal Post-Transplant Patients

Detecting allograft injury and rejection is critical to preventing graft loss. The current standard of care (SoC) relies on serum creatinine (SC) and biopsy to monitor for and identify kidney injury earlier. SC has poor specificity and sensitivity and response to rejection is often delayed. Protocol biopsy is more accurate but involves the risk of complications. A more definitive, less invasive method for monitoring injury and early rejection is needed.

We report on the clinical utility of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in transplant recipients' blood, measured using a novel SNP-based mmPCR NGS methodology, to diagnose allograft injury/rejection. In this study, investigators will measure how use of dd-cfDNA changes clinical practice.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

QURE Healthcare

San Francisco, California, 94109, United States

About this study

Five-year kidney allograft survival rates are estimated to be as low as 71.6%. A leading cause for the high prevalence of graft loss is the delay in detecting allograft injury from active rejection, when early diagnosis and intervention presents the greatest chance of preserving kidney function. Despite the frequent testing called for by care protocols, low levels of injury can go undetected due to the low specificity and sensitivity of current, standard testing methods: checking creatinine and immunosuppressive drug levels. More definitive graft biopsies are an option, but they are invasive, expensive and can even put the patient at risk for graft loss and other complications, making it undesirable as a frequent monitoring test.

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) detected in the blood of transplant recipients has been shown to be a non-invasive diagnostic marker for allograft injury/rejection. Natera, Inc. has recently developed a novel single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based mmPCR NGS methodology to measure dd-cfDNA in kidney transplant recipients for the detection of allograft injury and rejection. As a growing leader in the diagnostic space, Natera has commissioned a randomized controlled trial to determine the clinical utility of its dd-cfDNA detection methodology for practicing nephrologists treating kidney allograft patients. This study is expected to fill a gap in the evidence base on the clinical utility of dd-cfDNA testing for allograft rejection.

The study is a pre-post, two round controlled trial of care practices in a nationally representative sample of practicing nephrologists randomly assigned to a control or an intervention arm. All participants will be asked to propose care for a total of 6 CPV simulated patients who are adults aged 30-75; three or more months post-transplant; and presenting with signs, symptoms and laboratory findings suggestive of allograft rejection. Each assessment round will consist of 3 simulated patients. In between assessment rounds, participants randomized into the intervention arm will receive educational materials on the new allograft rejection test.

Investigators will assess whether practicing nephrologists more effectively identify and manage patients with possible kidney allograft rejection when given access to Natera's novel SNP-based mmPCR-NGS test that measures dd-cfDNA, and, whether those behavioral changes improves patient management and optimizes resource utilization.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • A minimum of 2 years post-residency but no more than 40 years in practice
  • Board-certified in internal medicine
  • Completion of a nephrology fellowship
  • In a private solo or multi-group practice
  • Minimum threshold of 5 post-kidney transplant (KT) patients currently seen monthly
  • Informed, signed and voluntarily consented to be in the study

Exclusion criteria

  • Not board certified in internal medicine
  • Have practiced as a board-certified physician for less than 2 or greater than 40 years
  • See <5 post-transplant patients monthly
  • Non-English speaking
  • Unable to access the internet

Treatment and study plan

Natera KidneyScan

Diagnostic Test

Online educational materials on Natera Kidneyscan (dd-cfDNA) and sample test results for simulated patients

Clinical Performance and Value Vignettes

Other

Online renal allograft simulated patients

Other names: CPVs

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnosis-Treatment

    Time frame: 3 months

    Difference-in-differences regression analysis between the control and the intervention group's identification and treatment of hyperglycemia, as measured by the participants diagnostic and treatment CPV case domain scores. In each domain of a CPV (history, physical exam, workup, diagnosis and treatment), participants' care recommendations are evaluated against evidence-based care scoring criteria which can sum to a high potential score of up to 100% in each domain.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of Care: CPV scores

    Time frame: 3 months

    Difference-in-differences regression analysis between the control and the intervention group's overall quality of care scores. In each CPV case, participants' care recommendations are evaluated against evidence-based care scoring criteria which can sum to a high potential score of up to 100% in each case.

  2. Workup Costs

    Time frame: 3 months

    Difference-in-differences regression analysis between between the control and the intervention group in the average cost of diagnostic tests ordered.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Qure Healthcare, LLC

Industry

Collaborators

  • Natera, Inc.

Registry information

Official study title

Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial Using CPV Vignettes to Assess the Clinical Utility of Natera Dd-cfDNA Test to Detect Allograft in Post-Transplant Patients

Acronym: QIDNEY

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Dec 5, 2018
Registry last updated
Sep 16, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.