Blood, urine and tumoral tissue samples
Diagnostic TestBlood, urine and tumoral tissue samples
NCT Number: NCT06575452
Diffuse gliomas are among the most common tumors of the central nervous system, with high morbidity and mortality and very limited therapeutic possibilities. The diffuse glioma are characterized by significant variability in terms of age at diagnosis, histological and molecular features, classification, ability to transform to a higher grade and/or to disseminate in the brain, response to treatment and patient outcome.
One of the main challenges in the management of diffuse gliomas is related to tumor heterogeneity within the same subgroup. Establishing an accurate tumor classification is of paramount importance for selecting personalized therapy or avoiding unnecessary treatment.
At present, the main diagnostic methods for detecting gliomas are based on histopathological features and mutation detection. Yet difficulties remain, due to tumor heterogeneity and sampling bias for tumors obtained from small biopsies. In particular, grade 2 (low-grade) and grade 3 (high-grade) gliomas cannot be easily distinguished, as intra-tumoral tumor grade heterogeneity is not uncommon in patients treated with extensive surgical resection. Another challenge in the field of gliomas is longitudinal monitoring of disease progression, which is currently mainly based on repeated brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). New tools to detect tumor changes before the onset of imaging changes would be useful.
Several genetic, epigenetic, metabolic and immunological profiles have been established for gliomas. Recently, the world of RiboNucleic Acid (RNA) has emerged as a promising area to explore for cancer therapy, especially since the (re)discovery of RNA chemical modifications. To date, more than 150 types of post-transcriptional modifications have been reported on various RNA molecules. This complex landscape of chemical marks embodies a new, invisible code that governs the post-transcriptional fate of RNA: stability, splicing, storage, translation.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Insitut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, Hérault, France
Diffuse gliomas are among the most common tumors of the central nervous system, with high morbidity and mortality and very limited therapeutic possibilities. Diffuse gliomas are characterized by great variability in terms of age at diagnosis, histological and molecular features, classification, ability to progress to a higher grade and/or to disseminate in the brain, response to treatment and patient outcome. One of the major challenges in the management of diffuse gliomas is related to the heterogeneity of tumor behavior within the same tumor subgroup. Although efforts have been made in recent decades to improve tumor characterization and classification, with the integration of molecular markers (e.g. Isocitrate DeHydrogenase (IDH) mutation), it remains difficult to predict treatment response and patient outcome at the individual level. Yet accurate tumor classification is of paramount importance in choosing personalized therapy or avoiding unnecessary treatments. At present, the main diagnostic methods for detecting gliomas are based on histopathological features, mutation detection or chromosome copy number variation.
However, difficulties remain, particularly with tumor classification, due to tumor heterogeneity and sampling bias for tumors obtained from small biopsies. In particular, grade 2 ("low-grade") and grade 3 ("high-grade") gliomas cannot be easily distinguished, as intratumoral tumor grade heterogeneity is not uncommon in patients treated with extensive surgical resection. Another challenge posed by gliomas is longitudinal monitoring of disease progression, which currently relies mainly on repeated brain MRI scans, with no return to the tumor itself due to the difficulty of obtaining new tumor samples in this setting. New tools to detect tumor changes in plasma, before imaging changes occur, would be useful. However, circulating markers present a real challenge, as the detection of markers readily used in other cancer types (e.g. circulating free DNA and circulating tumor cells) is hampered by a lack of sensitivity in gliomas.
Several genetic, epigenetic, metabolic and immunological profiles have been established in gliomas, considerably expanding the knowledge of the biological characteristics of these tumors and helping to identify potential treatments. Recently, the world of RNA has emerged as a promising area to explore for cancer therapy, particularly since the (re)discovery of chemical modifications of RNA (epitranscriptomics). To date, over 150 types of post-transcriptional modification have been reported on various RNA molecules. This landscape complex of chemical marks embodies a new, invisible code that governs the post-transcriptional fate of RNA: stability, splicing, storage, translation. Importantly, RNA epigenetics has emerged as a new layer of gene expression regulation in healthy tissues as well as in other pathologies such as cancer.
Chemical markers are associated with cancer evolution and adaptation, as well as with response to conventional therapies. Based on these observations, it is envisaged that: (1) the RNA epigenetic landscape evolves with cancer progression, establishing a "chemical signature" that could be exploited for diagnostic, prognostic and treatment response prediction purposes; (2) several chemical marks are not mere "transient" alterations but rather "driving" alterations of the tumorigenic process; (3) unlike unmodified nucleosides, modified nucleosides are preferentially excreted as metabolic end products in urine after circulating in the blood. Consequently, altered RNA markers in cancerous tissues can be detected in urine and blood and exploited for diagnostic purposes. An original approach recently published combines multiplex analysis of RNA marks by mass spectrometry with bioinformatics and machine learning. Using total RNA samples extracted from an existing cohort of patients (59 grade 2, 3 and 4 gliomas; 19 non-cancerous control samples), a first "chemical signature" capable of predicting glioma grade with remarkable efficiency and accuracy has been established.
N6, 2'-O-dimethyladenosine (m6Am), the most up-regulated marker in glioblastoma (GBM), is a driver of colorectal cancer aggressiveness. Located at the 5' end of messenger RiboNucleic Acid (mRNA), m6Am can influence mRNA stability and translation efficiency. This chemical tag is deposited by the Phosphorylated Carboxyl terminal domain Interacting Factor 1 (PCIF1), also known as CAPAM (PCIF1/CAPAM) methyltransferase (writer) and removed by the Fat mass and Obesity-associated protein (FTO) demethylase (eraser). FTO is down-regulated in colorectal cancer stem cells (CSCs), consistent with m6Am accumulation. High levels of m6Am significantly enhance CSC properties such as in vivo tumor initiation and chemoresistance, without significant changes to the transcriptome. This aggressive phenotype can be reversed by inhibition of PCIF1, demonstrating the potential of targeting epigenetic RNA effectors. The preliminary data on patient-derived glioma cell lines suggest a similar mechanism in glioma, where down-regulation of FTO promotes sphere-forming capacity in suspension culture of GBM stem cells.
(3) A method has been established to detect RNA markers in plasma samples that yielded favorable results after analysis of plasma samples from a colorectal cancer cohort. The same process was used to obtain preliminary data by analyzing plasma samples from grade 2 glioma patients vs. healthy donors. This experiment confirmed the possibility of detecting and quantifying 20 circulating nucleosides in blood. Significant changes were demonstrated between healthy donors and glioma patient samples for some of the circulating nucleosides. Some were up-regulated (e.g. n6,2'-O-dimethyladenosine (m6Am), 1-methylguanosine (m1G)) while others were down-regulated (e.g. adenosine (A), 5-methoxycarbonylmethyl-2-thiouridine (mcm5s2U)). Importantly, not all the tagged RNAs detected were altered (e.g. N1-methyladenosine (m1A); 5-methylcytosine (m5C)). If confirmed by a larger cohort, these changes could constitute an epitranscriptomics-based circulating signature for early disease detection. This preliminary experience reinforces the interest in m6Am.
Finally, changes were also observed in the serum of the same patients compared to healthy donor subjects, but from other nucleosides. This underlines the importance of studying circulating markers in blood for the diagnosis of gliomas.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Blood, urine and tumoral tissue samples
tumoral tissue samples
Time frame: At baseline, 3 months, 9 months and 18 months
Sensitivity of a test corresponds to its ability to give a positive result when the hypothesis is verified.
Time frame: At baseline, 3 months, 9 months and 18 months
Specificity measures the ability of a test to give a negative result when the hypothesis is not verified.
Time frame: At baseline, 3 months, 9 months and 18 months
Predictive value of a test is the probability of a condition being present as a function of the test result.
Time frame: At baseline, 3 months, 9 months and 18 months
Negative predictive value is the probability that the condition is not present when the test is negative.
Time frame: At baseline, 3 months, 9 months and 18 months
The sensitivity of a test corresponds to its ability to give a positive result when the hypothesis is verified.
Time frame: At baseline, 3 months, 9 months and 18 months
Specificity measures the ability of a test to give a negative result when the hypothesis is not verified.
Time frame: At baseline, 3 months, 9 months and 18 months
Predictive value of a test is the probability of a condition being present as a function of the test result.
Time frame: At baseline, 3 months, 9 months and 18 months
Negative predictive value is the probability that the condition is not present when the test is negative.
Time frame: Time from histological diagnosis to date of progression according to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Criteria (RANO 2.0) or death from any cause, assessed up to 18 months.
The progression is determined by RANO criteria. The RANO criteria divide radiological response into four types, based on imaging (MRI) and clinical features 1,2 :
Time frame: Time from histological diagnosis to the date of death, whatever the cause, assessed up to 18 months.
Time frame: Time from surgery to magnetic response imagery (MRI) showing best response, assessed up to 18 months.
The RANO criteria divide radiological response into four types, based on imaging (MRI) and clinical features 1,2 :
Time frame: At baseline, 3 months, 9 months and 18 months
Modified nucleoside expression marks in grade 2 tissue versus grade 3 or 4 focus. Nucleoside is a constituent element of nucleic acids, made up of a nitrogenous base associated with a sugar (ribose for RNA and deoxyribose for DNA).
Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) is an analytical method that combines the performance of liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry to precisely identify and/or quantify a wide range of substances.
An LC-MS unit comprises two main components: a liquid chromatograph and a mass spectrometer.
Time frame: At surgery, Day 0
Anti-ATRX immunostaining was classified into four semi-quantitative categories:
Time frame: At surgery, Day 0
Grade 2 : low-grade tumor Grade 2 : low-grade tumor Grade 4 : high-grade tumor, the most agressive Grade 3 : high-grade tumor
Time frame: At surgery, Day 0 of our timeline
Ki-67 is routinely detected on paraffin-embedded sections with an antibody, and its level calculated by evaluating the nuclear labeling of 1000 tumor cells, i.e. 100 cells/10 large fields (GC), with a positivity threshold above 5%.
Time frame: At Surgery, day 0 of our timeline
The sensitivity of a test corresponds to its ability to give a positive result when the hypothesis is verified.
Time frame: At Surgery, day 0 of our timeline
Negative predictive value is the probability that the condition is not present when the test is negative.
Time frame: At surgery, day 0 of our timeline
Predictive value of a test is the probability of a condition being present as a function of the test result.
Time frame: At surgery, Day 0 of our timeline
Anti-IDH immunostaining was classified into two qualitative categories: positive or negative. When the mutation is present, all tumor cells express the mutated protein. Cytoplasmic immunopositivity predicts the presence of the mutation at position R132 of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1).
Time frame: Assessed during follow-up, up to 18 months
Calculated in mm/year
Time frame: After surgery, approximately 30 days
The radiologist will assess whether the tumour resection margins are healthy or invaded by tumour foci
Time frame: At baseline and during follow-up, assessed up to 18 months
Tumor volume (cm3) determined by manual segmentation of tumor contours and mean tumor diameter MTD (calculated according to the formula MTD = (2x volume)1/3) at baseline and during follow-up for the prospective cohort.
Time frame: At baseline
On MRI, the radiologist will assess whether the soft meninges have been invaded by the tumour
Time frame: At baseline
The radiologist will assess the number of tumor foci per patient. Two groups will be created: unifocal (1 single tumor site) versus plurifocal (several tumor sites).
Time frame: At baseline
Tumor zone appearing dark on imaging versus lighter healthy zone
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle
Other
Acronym: EPIGLIO
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07076498
Brain Diseases, Brain Neoplasms
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07464925
Astrocytoma, Glioblastoma
Tampa, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07416188
Astrocytoma, Brain Cancer
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06161519
Astrocytoma, Brain Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details