Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05597852

Using Rectal Hydrogel Spacer for Salvage SABR in Prostate Cancer

There are several single institutional series that have reported their experience with salvage radiotherapy options that include EBRT, LDR and HDR brachytherapy. Gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity with salvage radiotherapy range between14-58%, respectively for patients undergoing re-irradiation. There is a concern for an increased risk of fistula development in these patients who receive second course of radiation. Hypofractionation using SABR has been utilized in the re-irradiation setting for prostate cancer with good tumor control and toxicity outcomes. In order to decrease the rectal toxicity, dose to the rectum should be kept as low as possible. Several techniques can be used to achieve this: tighter dosimetric dose painting, better patient or organ immobilization or use of a biodegradable gel. The Investigators ropose a phase I study to assess placement of a hydrogel spacer between the prostate and rectum, in an effort to decrease toxicity and improve patient's bowel quality of life.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre

Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Amandeep Taggar, MD

CONTACT

416 480 6165

Andrew Loblaw, MD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Danny Vesprini, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Gerard Morton, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Hans Chung, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Melanie Davidson, PhD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Moti Paudel, PhD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Patrick Cheung, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Renee Korol, PhD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Stanley Liu, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

William Chu, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

Primary treatment of prostate cancer includes surgery or radiotherapy. Although significant improvements have been made in patient selection and treatment planning, local recurrence remains a common problem.

In the case of local recurrence after radiation, salvage options may include prostatectomy, salvage external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or brachytherapy with low-dose (LDR) or high-dose rate (HDR) implantation, cryotherapy and high intensity focused ultrasound.

There are several single institutional series that have reported their experience with salvage radiotherapy options that include EBRT, LDR and HDR brachytherapy (2-7). Rates of grade 2 or higher genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity with salvage radiotherapy range between 36-50% and 14-58%, respectively for patients undergoing re-irradiation. GI Toxicity, however, is dependent on total rectal dose. This is especially important among patients who are being considered for re-irradiation. There is a concern for an increased risk of fistula development in these patients who receive second course of radiation although with salvage brachytherapy that risk was only 2% and seen only in patients who had a surgical intervention after salvage brachytherapy.

Hypofractionated regimens have become increasingly common in treatment of prostate cancer, especially with advancement of immobilization and imaging techniques that allow smaller margins and daily verification. Hypofractionation using SABR (Stereotatic Ablative Body Therapy) has been utilized in the re-irradiation setting for prostate cancer with good tumor control and toxicity outcomes. In order to decrease the rectal toxicity, dose to the rectum should be kept as low as possible. Several techniques can be used to achieve this: tighter dosimetric objectives, dose painting, better patient or organ immobilization or use of a biodegradable gel. The latter has been used to increase the distance between the prostate and the rectum for patients who are undergoing prostate radiotherapy. Placement of a hydrogel spacer between the prostate and the rectum has been proven in a randomized controlled trial to reduce rectal dose resulting in decreased acute and long-term rectal toxicity and improvement in bowel-related quality of life. SpaceOAR is an FDA and Health Canada approved, commercially available rectal spacer that, when placed between the prostate and the rectum, has demonstrated to greatly reduce rectal dose and toxicity for patients undergoing external beam radiation and LDR brachytherapy.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Histologically and radiologically confirmed locally recurrent prostate adenocarcinoma
  • Willing to give informed consent to participate in this clinical trial
  • Able and willing to complete EPIC and EQ-5D questionnaires

Exclusion criteria

  • Contraindication to prostate MRI
  • Anticoagulation medication (if unsafe to discontinue)
  • Diagnosis of bleeding diathesis
  • Poor baseline urinary function defined as International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) >20
  • Evidence of castrate resistance (defined as PSA > 3 ng/ml while testosterone is < 0.7nmol/l). Patients could have been on combined androgen blockade but are excluded if this was started due to PSA progression.
  • Definitive extrapelvic nodal or distant metastatic disease on staging investigations.
  • Prior ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy ( SBRT of 5Gy/fraction or higher)

Treatment and study plan

SpaceOAR

Device

SpaceOAR hydrogel spacer between the prostate and rectum, in an effort to decrease toxicity and improve patient's bowel quality of life.

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of SpaceOAR

    Time frame: 5 year

    To assess the feasibility, defined as successful placement in 70% of patients, of placing a hydrogel spacer, SpaceOAR™ in patients with biopsy confirmed locally recurrent prostate cancer, undergoing re-irradiation with hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy;

Secondary outcomes

  1. Acute and late cumulative incidence of toxicities

    Time frame: 5 years

    Acute and Late Cumulative incidence Using the CTCAE V5.0 for toxicities. Change of toxicity measured from Baseline

  2. Quality of Life using EPIC

    Time frame: 5 years

    Acute and late quality of life using Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC) Each question is scored from 1-5, 1 being the better outcome and 5 being the worst outcome.

  3. Biochemical disease-free survival

    Time frame: 5 years

    PSA levels will checked for biochemical disease-free survival

  4. Use of salvage ADT

    Time frame: 18 Months

    Up to eighteen months of luteinizing-hormone releasing hormone agonists or antagonists can be used according to physician discretion.

  5. Health utilities

    Time frame: 5 years

    Health utilities using the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) Each question is scored from 1-5, 1 being the better outcome and 5 being the worst outcome.

  6. Quality of Life using IPSS

    Time frame: 5 years

    Acute and late quality of life using International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Each question is scored from 1-5, 1 being the better outcome and 5 being the worst outcome.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Amandeep Taggar, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

416 480 6165

Andrea DeAbreu

CONTACT

[email protected]

416 480 5000 ext. 1058

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Feasibility of Integrating Rectal Hydrogel Spacer for Salvage Treatment Using Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Locally Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Acronym: FIRST STAR

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2027
First posted
Oct 28, 2022
Registry last updated
Oct 28, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.