Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06903429

Using LUminoMark vs Coventional Practice for Targeted Axillary Surgery

The purpose of this study was to compare the use of LuminoMarkTM as a method of targeting axillary lymph nodes with other existing methods used in each institution, such as charcoal staining, needle targeting, and ultrasound-guided skin marking, in patients with breast cancer clinically suspected of metastasis, with or without clipping at the time of diagnosis, regardless of the presence or absence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. By doing so, the investigators aimed to confirm the safety and usefulness of LuminoMarkTM as a targeting method.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

About this study

In breast cancer patients, lymph node targeting plays an important role in determining the stage and setting the treatment policy, and the existing methods for this purpose include charcoal staining, needle targeting, and ultrasound-guided skin marking. However, these methods have limitations in terms of detection rate and accuracy, and a new targeting method, LuminoMarkTM, shows the potential to replace them. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the detection rate and safety of lymph node targeting using LuminoMarkTM in breast cancer patients and to verify its effectiveness by comparing it with existing targeting methods. The study was designed as a prospective comparative study, and patients diagnosed with breast cancer and requiring lymph node targeting were divided into the LuminoMarkTM group and the existing method group. The existing method group selects a standard method among charcoal staining, needle targeting, and ultrasound-guided skin marking to perform targeting, and the lymph node detection rate, procedure time, complication rate, and patient satisfaction are the main evaluation indicators in both groups. After targeting, the suitability of the detected lymph nodes is confirmed through pathological analysis, and appropriate statistical analysis is performed to compare the difference in detection rates of each method. Through this study, the investigators evaluate whether LuminoMarkTM provides superior detection rates and safety compared to existing lymph node targeting methods, and based on this, the investigators aim to suggest a more effective and reliable targeting method for breast cancer patients.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 20 to 70 years
  • Women diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer through biopsy
  • Patients with clinically and imaging-suspected axillary lymph node metastasis, confirmed pathologically (aspiration cytology or needle biopsy)
  • Clinically staged T1-T4, N1-3
  • Patients who have fully understood the clinical trial content (if possible) and signed the informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with inadequate radiological evaluation of the axilla before surgery
  • Recurrent breast cancer or inflammatory breast cancer
  • Breast cancer with distant metastasis (Stage 4)
  • Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to the components of the investigational drug
  • Patients scheduled for axillary dissection that does not require targeting of the target lesion
  • Patients with active connective tissue disease (e.g., scleroderma, lupus) that has invaded the skin
  • Patients with locally advanced breast cancer or inflammatory locally advanced breast cancer that is not amenable to surgery
  • Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to the main component or excipients of the investigational drug
  • Female subjects who may become pregnant during the clinical trial period and do not agree to use a highly effective non-hormonal contraception method (e.g., sterilization, intrauterine device, complete abstinence, vasectomy partner) from the time of investigational drug injection until the follow-up visit
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Patients who have participated in another clinical trial within 12 weeks before enrollment in this clinical trial
  • Patients deemed unsuitable for participation by the investigator for any other reason

Treatment and study plan

Targeting of axillary lymph nodes using LuminoMark

Procedure

This group used LuminoMark as a targeting method for axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients with suspected metastasis, comparing it to existing methods (charcoal staining, needle targeting, ultrasound-guided skin marking) to assess its safety and effectiveness, with procedural differences based on neoadjuvant chemotherapy status.

Targeting of axillary lymph nodes using conventional method

Procedure

This group used conventional method (charcoal staining, needle targeting, ultrasound-guided skin marking) as a targeting method for axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients with suspected metastasis, with procedural differences based on neoadjuvant chemotherapy status.

Primary outcomes

  1. Accuracy of the axillary lymph node targeting method

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of observation at 3 weeks

    The outcome will be assessed by determining whether the preoperatively marked (targeted) lymph node is successfully identified and retrieved during surgery, and confirmed by postoperative pathological examination.

    Success (match): The retrieved lymph node is matched with targeted lymph node.

    Failure (not match): The retrieved lymph node is not matched with targeted lymph node.

  2. Comparison the accuracy rate between LuminoMark group and conventional group

    Time frame: At the end of the trial (up to 1 year)

    Compare the rate at which the lymph nodes are accurately detected using charcoal staining, needle targeting, ultrasound-guided marking, etc., with the rate at which they are detected using LuminoMark.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparion of surgical time between two group

    Time frame: During surgery

    Comparison of time from skin incision to detection of marked axillary lymph nodes Comparison of total axillary surgical time

  2. Comparison of complications between two groups

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of observation at 3 weeks

    Compare the postoperative complications after surgery

  3. Adverse drug reactions

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of observation at 3 weeks

    Compare the incidence of adverse drug reactions between two groups

  4. Concordance rate between sentinel lymph node and targeted lymph node in both group

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of observation at 3 weeks

    Concordance rate between sentinel lymph node and targeted lymph node in both group

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Jeeyeon Lee, Associate professor in Kyungpook National University, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

82-53-200-2707

Joon Suk Moon, Clinical assistant professor, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

82-53-200-7281

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Chung-Ang University Hospital
  • Gangnam Severance Hospital
  • Myongji Hospital
  • Samsung Medical Center
  • Soonchunhyang University Hospital

Registry information

Official study title

A Comparative Study to Evaluate Targeting Methods for Axillary Surgery in Patients With Clinically Node-positive Breast Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Pilot Study

Acronym: LUCAS

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2027
First posted
Mar 30, 2025
Registry last updated
Mar 30, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.