Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06306079

Using Gait Modification to Treat Knee Osteoarthritis in Saudi Arabia: Possibilities and Acceptability.

A variety of biomechanical gait modification interventions can elevate knee loading and improve knee symptoms in knee osteoarthritis patients. However, there was a lack of acceptability and adherence regarding modification interventions without any explanation.

Thus, this study investigates the feasibility and acceptability of foot insoles as a gait modification tool among Saudi Arabian knee osteoarthritis patients and physiotherapists.

This study aims to answer the following:

* Which gait modification intervention is most likely to be implemented in Saudi Arabia (SA) clinical practice, taking context, patients' clinical and research evidence into consideration? * In Saudi Arabia, can this proposed foot-insole intervention be implemented? Is there sufficient experience among physiotherapists regarding gait modification to deliver it, and will patients engage with it? How can KOA rehabilitation outcomes be evaluated in the future?

The participants will be conducted over three phases:

1. The patients' interview and therapists' focus group discussion will be used to examine KOA patients' and clinicians' perspectives on enabling and accepting gait modifications in phase 1. 2. The feasibility study will explore how a small number of KOA patients tolerate gait modifications and consider the most relevant outcome measures, such as pain and function, in phase (2). 3. A small group of knee osteoarthritis patients and their physiotherapists who participated in phase (2) will be asked to participate in a descriptive survey in phase (3). To examine the acceptability and feasibility of the study intervention in phase (2).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

45 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre

Jeddah, Western, Saudi Arabia

About this study

Since several different types of gait modifications have been studied, it has been challenging to determine which are most likely to be used by patients and healthcare professionals.

A notable number of Saudi Arabians suffer from knee osteoarthritis (KOA), which reported a 29.5% prevalence of KOA; another recent study reported a 24.5% prevalence of KOA among the elderly. A 2002 study found that 30.8% of those aged 46-55 and 60.6% aged 66-75 were affected. Thus, KOA is roughly equally distributed between genders and is more prevalent among elderly and overweight individuals, so policymakers should focus on raising awareness to prevent and treat affected individuals. The healthcare system in SA is publicly funded and accessible; 79% of patients use the public system, and the rest obtain private care. In most cases, private patients have insurance coverage. The public healthcare system has three primary, secondary, and tertiary care levels. Rehabilitation and gait modification investigations are not available at the primary level.

This snapshot of the literary review raises questions about the viability of the long-term use of learned/assistive gait modifications. The studies reported dissatisfaction with the gait modification approach but gave no reasons. Since most studies focus on results in a short time or a specific area, pre-training courses measuring acceptability and commitment can fill the gaps in previous studies. After determining the importance of gait modification, the question becomes, should it be integrated into the therapy strategy or other rehabilitative methods to increase the treatment's clinical efficacy? It is essential to understand the practices, views and expectations of KOA patients and health professionals concerning gait modifications.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

KOA Patient participants:

  • Adults aged above 45 years old.
  • Both Male & Female.
  • Radiographically or KOA participants meet any diagnostic classification guidelines/criteria (American College of Rheumatology classification criteria) or any eligible diagnostic guidelines.
  • Typical knee pain while walking > 3 on an 11-point scale (0-10) in at least one knee pain or tenderness, primarily in the medial knee.

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe KOA subjects (on the waiting list for knee arthroplasty).
  • Knee post-operation or corticosteroid intra-articular injection last 6 months.
  • Inability to walk for longer than 20 minutes without experiencing severe pain.
  • Painful treadmill walking or unable to walk without heavy assistance, such as a lifting belt or walker frame.
  • Significant knee effusion, musculoskeletal or neurological diseases that influence gait parameters.
  • It is presently undergoing physiotherapy treatment.
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), gout, one or both knees replaced, low back pain, hip OA, any serious knee or lower limb injuries in the past 24 months.

Treatment and study plan

Lateral Wedge insole

Device

Insoles with lateral wedges are placed in patients' shoes to control biomechanical knee loading on the medial side of the knee. Insoles with lateral wedges are designed to be thinner on the inside (medially of the foot) and thicker on the outside (laterally of the foot) to relieve knee biomechanical loading parameters.

Other names: Footwear insole, Ankle foot orthoses

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain level

    Time frame: 6 weeks post-intervention.

    The change from baseline pain intensity level at 6-weeks, based on the nine points of a visual analogue scale, where 0 represents (no pain) and 9 represents (worst pain).

  2. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index-total

    Time frame: 6 weeks post-intervention.

    The change from baseline pain, stiffness and physical activity levels at 6-weeks.

    Each question is scored from 0 to 4, which are: None (0), Mild (1), Moderate (2), Severe (3), and Extreme (4).

    Scores are summed for each subscale, ranging from 0-20 for pain, 0-8 for stiffness, and 0-68 for Physical Function.

    A higher WOMAC score indicates worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.

  3. Likert scale

    Time frame: 6 weeks post-intervention.

    Measuring knee osteoarthritic subjects' satisfaction based on the 5 point Likert scale survey.

  4. Likert scale

    Time frame: 6 weeks post-intervention supervision.

    Measuring therapists' agreement based on the 5-point Likert scale survey.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

King Khalid University

Other

Collaborators

  • University of Nottingham

Registry information

Official study title

The Possibilities and Acceptability of Applying Gait Modification to the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis in Saudi Arabia Based on the Perceptions of Patients and Physiotherapists. A Mixed-methods Feasibility Study.

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Mar 12, 2024
Registry last updated
Mar 12, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.