Bill Nelems Pain and Research Centre
Kelowna, British Columbia, V1Y 0G1, Canada
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06731920
Injections that freeze neck joints can be done using x-rays or ultrasound imaging, which as a newer way of guiding the needle to the right spot. This study will look at how often freezing liquid goes into a blood vessel during neck injections that freeze neck joints when ultrasound guidance is used to place the needle. When this happens, it can go undetected because it does not make the patient feel any different, however it could cause a test block to be falsely negative, leading to the wrong diagnosis. Based on previous studies, we think that this happens rarely, and the purpose of this study is to prove that conclusively
Interested in participating?
Request Info19 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Kelowna, British Columbia, V1Y 0G1, Canada
Location status: Recruiting
Cervical medial branch blocks (CMBB) are commonly employed for the diagnosis and management of facet-related pain. The latter constitutes the most important cause of axial neck pain and has been implicated in 40% of all cases. In addition, the upper cervical joints can also cause cervicogenic headaches, an often-debilitating condition representing up to 20% of chronic headaches3. Well-defined pain referral patterns for each joint can help operators select the appropriate injection level. While fluoroscopy has long been the imaging standard for spinal procedures, ultrasound guidance (USG) is being increasingly adopted as an alternative and presents several advantages such as the ability to identify and avoid soft tissue structures such as blood vessels during needle insertion. From a clinical perspective, avoiding blood vessels and reducing the incidence of vascular breach can lessen the occurrence of intravascular injections that are associated with false negative diagnostic blocks. Indeed, a recent study examining the safety of USG CMBB reported a lower incidence of vascular breach than previous studies that had used fluoroscopic guidance. While these findings suggested a potential benefit associated with USG, further confirmatory studies employing digital subtraction angiography (DSA), the current imaging standard to detect intravascular spread, are required. We hypothesize that USG will be associated will a lower incidence of intravascular spread during primary needle placement than has been reported with fluoroscopic guidance.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Consenting patients over 19 years of age undergoing an ultrasound-guided cervical medial branch blocks as part of their usual care.
Exclusion criteria
Subjects with one or more of the following characteristics will be excluded from the study:
Known bleeding disorder or coagulopathy Patients on antiplatelet medication other than aspirin and those on anticoagulants (coumadin, AT III agents) Inability to visualize targeted structures on ultrasound Known allergy to contrast agents
ultrasound-guided cervical medial branch block with fluoroscopic control and digital subtraction angiography
Time frame: During the course of needle placement
Incidence of intravascular spread of contrast as determined after a review of the DSA sequences by a physician not involved in the patient's care.
Time frame: During needle placement
Number and distribution of vessels observed near the target.
Time frame: During needle placement
Incidence of vascular breach during needle placement.
Time frame: During needle placement
Number of needle repositionings required (before and after DSA)
Time frame: From beginning to completion of block procedure
Occurrence of any block-related complications.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Montreal General Hospital
Other
The Incidence of Inadvertent Intravascular Injection During Ultrasound-guided Cervical Medial Branch Blocks: a Fluoroscopically Controlled Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06906107
Cervicalgia, Neck Pain
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06996015
Cervicalgia, Cognitive Behavior Therapy
Faisalabad, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT06416527
Cervicalgia, Neck Pain
São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT06670131
Cervicalgia, Neck Pain
View Trial Details