the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
Hefei, Anhui, 230022, China
NCT Number: NCT02197481
The purpose of this study is to compare short-term and long-term efficacy of BiClamp forceps hepatectomy and clamp-crushing technique for parenchymal transection during elective hepatic resection.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Hefei, Anhui, 230022, China
Background: Blood loss and the need for blood transfusions during the liver transection have shown to be correlated with higher morbidity and mortality rates and with worsen prognosis. Various devices of liver parenchymal transection have been developed with a view to reducing the intraoperative blood loss. However, to the present there is no randomized controlled trial evaluating the technique of BiClamp forceps during the liver transection. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of BiClamp forceps transection in comparison to the clamp crushing technique in patients offered liver resection.
Intervention: One hundred patients with hepatobiliary disease need undergo hepatectomy at Anhui medical university were selected and divided into BiClamp forceps hepatectomy group and clamp-crushing hepatectomy group, each group contains 50 cases.
Results:
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Liver transection during hepatectomy by monopole electronicknife and blood vessel forceps, but without BiClamp forceps
liver transection during hepatectomy by BiClamp forceps
Time frame: an expected average of 80 minutes
Blood loss during operation. Blood loss was calculated from the beginning to the end of operation The amount of blood loss was measured from the suction volume after subtraction of rinse fluids and from the weight of soaked gauzes that were used during transection
Time frame: an expected average of 40 minutes
liver transection time was calculated from the beginning to the end of the liver resection
Time frame: 90 days
Operative mortality was defined as any death resulting from a complication during surgery
Time frame: 90 days
Time frame: 90 days
Biliary leakage was documented in line with the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS) definitions and grading systems
Time frame: an expected average of 12 days
Time from day of operation to day of discharge
Time frame: 2 days
Administration of blood transfusions is documented for the intraoperative and postoperative period until 48 hours postoperatively
Time frame: 3 postoperative day
serum total bilirubin on 3 postoperative day (umol/L)
The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University
Other
BiClamp Forceps Liver Transection Versus Clamp Crushing Technique in Liver Resections: A Randomized Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05495178
Digestive System Diseases, Hepatobiliary Disease
View Trial DetailsNCT05481398
Digestive System Diseases, Hepatobiliary Disease
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT04213183
Artificial Intelligence, Digestive System Diseases
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT01918813
Digestive System Diseases, Gastroenteritis
Nishinomiya, Hyōgo, Japan
View Trial Details