Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02185664

Use of Static Ultrasound Guidance for Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation in Adult Cardiac Surgical Patients

Cannulation of the internal jugular vein (IJV) for central venous access is a standard practice in cardiac surgery. In this study, the authors tested the hypothesis that using an ultrasound (US) scanner would increase the success of IJV cannulation and decrease the incidence of complications in adult cardiac surgical patients.

The study will include adult cardiac surgical patients, randomized into two groups (control vs. US). In the control group, IJV cannulation will be performed by the conventional landmark technique using Seldinger method. In the US group, the course of the IJV will be marked before cannulation using a 2 - 4 MHz transthoracic echocardiography probe. The success rate, number of attempts, cannulation time and complication rate will be compared for the two groups.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

15 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Govind Ballabh Pant Hospital

New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110002, India

About this study

Use of real time ultrasound has recently been recommended as the standard of care for insertion of central venous catheters. However, its usage is limited by various factors which include availability, space constraints and perceived lack of need according to surveys including cardiovascular anesthesiologists. We will conduct a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare the conventional landmark technique with the static ultrasound (US) technique that utilized the transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) ultrasound probe which is supplied along with the transesophageal echocardiography machines for internal jugular vein cannulation in adult cardiac surgical patients.

After ethical committee approval and patient consent, adult patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery will be randomized to undergo internal jugular vein cannulation by either of the two methods: standard landmark technique (group A: control group), static US technique using the TTE probe (group B: ultrasound group). The success rate, number of attempts, total cannulation time and complication rate in the two groups will be compared.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • adult patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery

Exclusion criteria

  • patients undergoing bidirectional Glenn shunt, Fontan surgery or emergency surgery
  • local site infection
  • presence of coagulopathy
  • anatomical deformity of neck(burns, neck swelling, surgical scar)

Treatment and study plan

landmark technique

Procedure

The apex of the imaginary triangle formed between the two heads of sternocleidomastoid and clavicle was used as the point of needle entry, just lateral to the pulsation of the internal carotid artery and directed towards the ipsilateral nipple at an angle of 45 degrees.

Static Ultrasound technique

Device

Static ultrasound guided internal jugular vein cannulation was performed by using the transthoracic echocardiography probe supplied with the transesophageal echocardiography machine in the cardiothoracic surgery operation theatre. The internal jugular vein was located and marked using this method prior to puncture.

Primary outcomes

  1. success

    Time frame: during internal jugular venous cannulation

    Success was defined as location of the IJV by the finder needle within five attempts.

Secondary outcomes

  1. number of attempts by finder/locator needle

    Time frame: at the time of internal jugular vein cannulation

    The total number of attempts taken to locate the internal jugular vein using the locator/finder needle were measured.

  2. total number of attempts by puncture needle

    Time frame: at the time of internal jugular vein cannulation

    The total number of attempts taken by the puncture needle to enter the internal jugular vein were measured.

  3. First attempt sucess

    Time frame: at the time of internal jugular vein cannulation

    First attempt success was defined as location of the IJV by finder needle in the first attempt.

  4. Central venous cannulation time

    Time frame: at the time of internal jugular venous cannulation

    Time to central venous cannulation (CVC) was defined as the time taken from the insertion of finder needle till de-airing and flushing of all the three ports of the triple lumen catheter.

  5. ultrasound time

    Time frame: at the time of internal jugular vein cannulation

    The duration of ultrasound was defined as the time between the placement of the probe on neck till the marking of the course of the vein on the skin.

  6. total cannulation time

    Time frame: at the time of internal jugular vein cannulation

    control group: total cannulation time= central venous cannulation time ultrasound group: total cannulation time= central venous cannulation time+ ultrasound time

  7. complication rate

    Time frame: at the time of central venous cannulation

    The complication rate was calculated as a percentage of the total number of complications with respect to the sample size

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Govind Ballabh Pant Hospital

Other Gov

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of the Landmark Technique and the Static Ultrasound Guided Technique for Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation in Adult Cardiac Surgical Patients.

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Jul 9, 2014
Registry last updated
Jul 15, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.