Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Enrolling by Invitation

NCT Number: NCT05022199

Use of SPY Fluorescent Angiography to Reduce Ureteroenteric Stricture Rate Following Urinary Diversion

Ureteroenteric anastomotic stricture is a well-known complication of urinary diversion which occurs in 4-25% of patients. Recent study has yielded that radiation is a significant risk factor for development of ureteroenteric stricture. The goal of this study is to determine whether intraoperative use of SPY fluorescent angiography during urinary diversion reduces rate of ureteroenteric stricture.

This study will include 215 patients who have undergone urinary diversion over the past 5 years as historic controls and compare ureteroenteric stricture rates to a prospective cohort of patients in whom intraoperative SPY fluorescent angiography was used at the time of urinary diversion to assess the anastomotic perfusion. This will include injection of ICG intravenously as well as utilization of the SPY device to assess ureteral perfusion before and after ureteroenteric anastomosis. Based on power analysis, this study will require approximately 50 patients in our prospective group to detect a clinically significant difference of 5% between groups. Data analysis plan includes the use of chi square test for comparison of stricture rates between groups. Clinical outcomes will be followed prospectively, with no amendment to standard follow-up per physician.

Enrolling by Invitation

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Virginia

Charlottesville, Virginia, 22902, United States

About this study

Ureteroenteric anastomotic stricture is a well-known complication of urinary diversion which occurs in 4-25% of patients. Strictures present clinically with flank pain, decreased renal function, pyelonephritis or may be asymptomatic and diagnosed incidentally with progressive hydronephrosis and renal impairment. Strictures are a cause of significant morbidity and health care expenditure, as treatment necessitates procedural intervention and often several inpatient admissions. Numerous studies have sought to identify risk factors for development of ureteroenteric strictures as well as opportunities for technical approaches to reduce stricture risk. Studies have demonstrated that Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 complication and BMI were associated with higher risk of stricture.

Ischemia of the anastomosis related to the tenuous ureteral blood supply is implicated in the formation of ureteroenteric stricture. Basic science and animal data have established the detrimental impact of radiation therapy on microvasculature. Radiation induced ureteral ischemia in conjunction with periureteral fibrosis make preservation of distal ureteral blood supply during urinary diversion tenuous and challenging. This is especially of concern in patients requiring pelvic exenteration for colorectal or gynecological malignancy, which often necessitate radiation therapy prior to surgical intervention. Radiation history is also an important contributor commonly in patients undergoing benign diversion for radiation cystitis.

Several groups have tested whether varied surgical methods may offer risk reduction. Surgical anastomotic approach has not significantly impacted ureteroenteric stricture rate. However, a more recent study suggests that intracorporeal diversion confers a higher risk of ureteroenteric stricture. The gold standard for treatment of ureteroenteric stricture is open repair with ureteral reimplantation. Open surgical repair has success of 92-100%, while endoscopic management has success of 30-50%.

A recent study demonstrated that through the use of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescent angiography while performing urinary diversion using the DaVinci robotic system, that they were able to reduce stricture rates from 10.6% to 0%. Use of this technology allows the surgeon to evaluate the vascular supply to the ureter as well as the newly created ureteroenteric anastomosis. This significant reduction in complications has tremendous implications for improvement in patient care and reduction of morbidity. Many patients are not candidates for robotic urinary diversion and thus undergo open surgery. Fluorescent angiography has also shown promise for decreasing ureteroenteric stricture rate in open surgery.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Undergoing open urinary diversion

Exclusion criteria

  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Robotic-assisted urinary diversion
  • Pregnant Women

Treatment and study plan

SPY fluorescent angiography

Device

This group has had SPY fluorescent angiography used intraoperatively during urinary diversion. To be compared with historic controls who did not.

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Ureteroenteric Stricture

    Time frame: 1.5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. 90 day postoperative readmission

    Time frame: 90 days

  2. Rate of hydronephrosis, pyelonephritis, or renal impairment

    Time frame: 90 days

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Virginia

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2023
First posted
Aug 26, 2021
Registry last updated
Aug 26, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.