Creighton University School of Dentistry
Omaha, Nebraska, 68178, United States
NCT Number: NCT01523509
The proposed test is intended to enable dentists to differentiate between cavitated and non-cavitated tooth decay in the areas where teeth are in contact (interproximal surfaces). In these areas, dentists cannot visually inspect for caries, and currently bitewing X-rays (BWs) only correctly detect the presence of enamel decay 15-25% of the time. This low sensitivity can lead to late treatment resulting in unnecessarily large fillings, crowns, pain, root canals, and possible later loss of teeth.
Hypothesis: Use of radiographic contrast on teeth will increase the accuracy of detection of early cavitation from 58% to 90%.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me19 year–99 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Omaha, Nebraska, 68178, United States
Tooth sites will be recorded by tooth number, type of surface (mesial, distal,occlusal), cavitated, non-cavitated, healthy. Radiographs will similarly be scored.Although contrast agents are classified as drugs this is not a study of drug properties or effect on cells since the properties of the agent are already well know and its safety record well established. This study will be recording the radiopacity of the contrast agent on healthy tooth surfaces, non-cavitated tooth surfaces and cavitated tooth surfaces. The outcome for each surface type will be presence or absence of a radiopacity on a radiograph which will be made at the one and only visit for each study subject. The radiograph contains the data from the intervention (placement of contrast agent) and the outcome will be assessed some weeks later after the completion of the data collection.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Application of Sodium Iodide contrast topically to tooth immediately followed by radiograph.
Time frame: Immediately after application of contrast agent.
The PI will perform the clinical application of the contrast agent and radiograph the subject. In this way it will be known that the data has been collected. At a later date 3 independent dentists will be provided with blinded radiographs in a randomized order to report the presence or absence of cavitated caries lesions.
Creighton University
Other
The Use of Radiographic Contrast to Differentiate Cavitated From Non-cavitated Dental Caries
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07718412
Behavior, Dental Caries
Sivas, Merkez, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07720999
Dental Caries, Neurologic Manifestations
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04750902
Dental Caries, Stomatognathic Diseases
Loma Linda, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06861725
Caries Arrested, Dental Caries
Cairo, Cairo Guv, Egypt
View Trial Details