Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01786681

Use of Positive Pressure in Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Reduction Stomach Surgery

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of using positive pressure in the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative morbidly obese individuals undergoing gastroplasty.

It is believed that the application of these devices before, during or after surgery can help to improve the lungs and reduce pulmonary complications after surgery to reduce the stomach.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

25 year–55 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Universidade Metodista de Piracicaba (UNIMEP)

Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil

About this study

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of using positive pressure in the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative morbidly obese individuals undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with regard to: lung volumes and capacities, the prevalence of atelectasis, duration of surgery and diaphragmatic mobility.

Individuals with BMI between 40 and 55 kg/m2, aged between 25 and 55 years, were submitted to Roux-en-Y type gastric bypass by laparotomy. Patients showing a normal preoperative pulmonary function test were included, but those with hemodynamic instability, a hospital stay longer than three days or the presence of postoperative complications were excluded.

The volunteers were divided into four different groups:

Gpre: subjects treated with positive pressure in the BiPAP mode (Bi-Level Positive Airway Pressure) for one hour before surgery; Gpos: individuals treated with positive airway pressure (BiPAP) for one hour after surgery; Gpeep: individuals treated with 10 cm H2O of PEEP (Positive End Expiratory Pressure) during the surgical procedure.

Gcont: individuals treated with conventional physiotherapy (CP) according to the routine service of physiotherapy of the hospital, including the techniques of pulmonary re-expansion, breathing exercises (deep breaths or fractional), the use of incentive spirometry (Respiron®), bronchial hygiene resources if necessary (Flutter® and cough active or assisted) and assisted ambulation. It should be noted that the physiotherapist was blinded to the individual's participation in the groups, and all patients received conventional physiotherapy, independent of the group in which they were included.

The respiratory evaluation (preoperative and second postoperative days) consisted of collecting the anthropometric data, a pulmonary function test and a chest radiography (inspired and expired).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • BMI between 40 and 55 kg/m2
  • Aged between 25 and 55 years
  • Submitted to Roux-en-Y type gastric bypass by laparotomy
  • Normal preoperative pulmonary function test

Exclusion criteria

  • Hemodynamic instability
  • Hospital stay longer than three days
  • Presence of postoperative complications

Treatment and study plan

Positive pressure

Procedure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pulmonary function

    Time frame: 2 days after surgery

    Spirometry was carried out according to the guidelines of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS) (2005). Three types of maneuver were used in order to evaluate the lung volumes and flows: Slow Vital Capacity (SVC), Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and Maximum Voluntary Ventilation (MVV). The maneuvers were carried out until three acceptable and reproducible curves were obtained, not exceeding more than eight attempts. The values extracted from each maneuver were selected according to Pereira (2002), and the predicted values calculated using the equation proposed by Pereira et al. (1992) for Brazilians.

  2. Prevalence of atelectasis

    Time frame: 2 days after surgery

    The radiological report on the inspiration radiography, issued by the hospital radiologist, was used to analyze the presence of atelectasis.

  3. Thoracoabdominal mobility

    Time frame: 2 days after surgery

    The measurement of thoracoabdominal mobility was performed by using a tape scaled in centimeters. In the standing position, the measurements were made at levels axillary, xiphoid and abdominal during rest, and at maximal inspiration and maximal expiration. At each level, the measurements were performed three times. It computed the highest value of inspiration and the lowest of expiration. The absolute difference between these values was considered the thoracoabdominal mobility.

  4. Diaphragmatic mobility

    Time frame: 2 days after surgery

    The chest X-ray was made using two radiographic exposures, with the patient in the standing position. The first was taken at the end of a maximal inspiration, seeking the largest inspired lung volume (Total Lung Capacity - TLC), and the second in profound exhalation without changing the position of the film or the patient, seeking the maximum emptying of the lungs (Residual Volume - RV). The diaphragmatic motion was analyzed by superimposing the two radiological films, and calculating the distance between the highest point of the diaphragm in expiration and the highest point of the dome on bilateral inspiration.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Universidade Metodista de Piracicaba

Other

Collaborators

  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior.

Registry information

Official study title

Use of Positive Pressure in Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Gastroplasty

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2011
First posted
Feb 8, 2013
Registry last updated
Feb 8, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.