University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States
NCT Number: NCT02219230
The goals of this study are to assess measured, observed, and self-reported outcomes achieved through the use of passive (mechanical), active(motorized) and adaptive (magnetorheological) prosthetic knee control systems in individuals with unilateral, transfemoral amputation.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me45 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States
An interrupted time-series trial with pre/post baseline assessments, randomized crossover of interventions, and within-phase repeated measures is used to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the Össur Power Knee II and the Össur Rheo Knee in individuals with unilateral, transfemoral amputation. A rigorous and clinically-meaningful experimental protocol is applied to verify study participants receive appropriate training, experience, and assessment in each knee condition. A suite of standardized and ad-hoc physical performance tests, patient-reported questionnaires, and monitoring technologies were carefully selected to assess important, clinically-relevant participant outcomes. Comparative effectiveness of three prosthetic knee interventions are evaluated using direct measurement (i.e., timed tests), observed clinical ratings (i.e., subjective assessments of gait quality) and self-report instruments (i.e., health status surveys). Analyses will focus on identifying differences between control system technologies inherent to each type of prosthetic knee (i.e., passive [mechanical], adaptive [magnetorheological], and active [power]). Outcomes will be used to establish recommendations for which activities and patients knees are most appropriate or likely to produce a desired effect.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Prosthetic knee with active control system.
Other names: Power knee, Motorized knee
Prosthetic knee with adaptive control system.
Other names: Magnetorheological knee, Microprocessor knee
Prosthetic knee with mechanical control system.
Other names: Mechanical knee, Hydraulic knee, Pneumatic knee
Time frame: Change from Baseline (mean score at weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4) to Follow-Up (mean score at weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28)
Timed performance test that measures rising from a chair, walking 3m, and returning to a seated position.
Time frame: Change from Baseline (mean score at weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4) to Follow-Up (mean score at weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28)
Timed performance test that involves walking up and down a 14ft ramp.
Time frame: Change from Baseline (mean score at weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4) to Follow-Up (mean score at weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28)
Timed performance test that involves walking up and down 6 steps.
Time frame: Change from Baseline (mean score at weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4) to Follow-Up (mean score at weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28)
Average daily step counts measured by an accelerometer-based device.
Time frame: Change from Baseline (mean score at weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4) to Follow-Up (mean score at weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28)
Time to walk a 1/2-mile outdoor walking course.
Time frame: Change from Baseline (mean score at weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4) to Follow-Up (mean score at weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28)
Self-report phone survey.
Time frame: Change from Baseline (mean score at weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4) to Follow-Up (mean score at weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28)
Self-report computerized survey (12 questions)
Time frame: Change from Baseline (mean score at weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4) to Follow-Up (mean score at weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28)
Self-report computerized survey (18 questions).
Time frame: Change from Baseline (mean score at weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4) to Follow-Up (mean score at weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28)
Self-report computerized questionnaire with 8-14 questions per domain. Includes Physical Function, Fatigue, and General Health subdomains.
University of Washington
Other
Outcomes Associated With Use of Passive, Adaptive, and Active Prosthetic Knees in Persons With Unilateral, Transfemoral Amputation: a Randomized Crossover Trial
Acronym: OPK
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05662982
Transfemoral Amputation
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06399471
Transfemoral Amputation
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05925712
Amputation, Skin Health
Gainesville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04023045
Artificial Limbs, Transfemoral Amputation
Edmonds, Washington, United States
View Trial Details