Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02219230

Use of Passive, Adaptive, and Active Prosthetic Knees in Persons With Unilateral, Transfemoral Amputation

The goals of this study are to assess measured, observed, and self-reported outcomes achieved through the use of passive (mechanical), active(motorized) and adaptive (magnetorheological) prosthetic knee control systems in individuals with unilateral, transfemoral amputation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

45 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Washington

Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States

About this study

An interrupted time-series trial with pre/post baseline assessments, randomized crossover of interventions, and within-phase repeated measures is used to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the Össur Power Knee II and the Össur Rheo Knee in individuals with unilateral, transfemoral amputation. A rigorous and clinically-meaningful experimental protocol is applied to verify study participants receive appropriate training, experience, and assessment in each knee condition. A suite of standardized and ad-hoc physical performance tests, patient-reported questionnaires, and monitoring technologies were carefully selected to assess important, clinically-relevant participant outcomes. Comparative effectiveness of three prosthetic knee interventions are evaluated using direct measurement (i.e., timed tests), observed clinical ratings (i.e., subjective assessments of gait quality) and self-report instruments (i.e., health status surveys). Analyses will focus on identifying differences between control system technologies inherent to each type of prosthetic knee (i.e., passive [mechanical], adaptive [magnetorheological], and active [power]). Outcomes will be used to establish recommendations for which activities and patients knees are most appropriate or likely to produce a desired effect.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • age 45 - 75
  • body weight less than 275lbs
  • unilateral amputation between the hip and knee
  • amputation due to non-vascular causes
  • no other major limb amputations
  • amputation occurred at least 2 years prior
  • stable limb volume (i.e., at least 6 months on an unmodified prosthetic socket)
  • intact skin tissue without open wounds or sores for at least 2 months
  • physiologically stable medical condition (i.e., non-degenerative)
  • possession and regular (i.e., daily) use of a prosthesis with a prosthetic knee with non-microprocessor (i.e., mechanical or fluid) stance control
  • Medicare functional classification level (MFCL or "K-level") 3

Exclusion criteria

  • expect to receive or are expected to require a replacement prosthetic socket within 15 months
  • complete reliance on an assistive device (i.e., cane or walker) for ambulation

Treatment and study plan

Active knee (Ossur Power Knee II)

Device

Prosthetic knee with active control system.

Other names: Power knee, Motorized knee

Adaptive knee (Ossur Rheo)

Device

Prosthetic knee with adaptive control system.

Other names: Magnetorheological knee, Microprocessor knee

Passive knee (Various manufacturers)

Device

Prosthetic knee with mechanical control system.

Other names: Mechanical knee, Hydraulic knee, Pneumatic knee

Primary outcomes

  1. Timed Up and Go

    Time frame: Change from Baseline (mean score at weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4) to Follow-Up (mean score at weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28)

    Timed performance test that measures rising from a chair, walking 3m, and returning to a seated position.

  2. Timed Ramp Test

    Time frame: Change from Baseline (mean score at weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4) to Follow-Up (mean score at weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28)

    Timed performance test that involves walking up and down a 14ft ramp.

  3. Timed Stair Test

    Time frame: Change from Baseline (mean score at weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4) to Follow-Up (mean score at weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28)

    Timed performance test that involves walking up and down 6 steps.

  4. Step activity

    Time frame: Change from Baseline (mean score at weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4) to Follow-Up (mean score at weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28)

    Average daily step counts measured by an accelerometer-based device.

  5. Obstacle course time

    Time frame: Change from Baseline (mean score at weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4) to Follow-Up (mean score at weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28)

    Time to walk a 1/2-mile outdoor walking course.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Reported Falls

    Time frame: Change from Baseline (mean score at weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4) to Follow-Up (mean score at weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28)

    Self-report phone survey.

  2. Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline (mean score at weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4) to Follow-Up (mean score at weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28)

    Self-report computerized survey (12 questions)

  3. Activities Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline (mean score at weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4) to Follow-Up (mean score at weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28)

    Self-report computerized survey (18 questions).

  4. Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline (mean score at weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4) to Follow-Up (mean score at weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28)

    Self-report computerized questionnaire with 8-14 questions per domain. Includes Physical Function, Fatigue, and General Health subdomains.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Washington

Other

Collaborators

  • Össur Iceland ehf

Registry information

Official study title

Outcomes Associated With Use of Passive, Adaptive, and Active Prosthetic Knees in Persons With Unilateral, Transfemoral Amputation: a Randomized Crossover Trial

Acronym: OPK

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
Aug 18, 2014
Registry last updated
Dec 28, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.