Service de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, Hôpital Louis Mourier
Colombes, 92700, France
NCT Number: NCT03406572
Chronic respiratory insufficiency and COPD are the third leading cause of death worldwide. Patients decompensate at various stages of their disease and exhibit acute-on-chronic respiratory failure (ACRF), a frequent cause of ICU hospitalization for hypercapnic acute respiratory failure (ARF). Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is the first line ventilatory treatment for hypercapnic ARF. It is applied intermittently, separated by periods of spontaneous breathing (SB) with standard oxygen (O2).
Standard O2 has drawbacks that limit the benefit of intermittent NIV in hypercapnic ARF: limited gas flow which is well below the patient's inspiratory flow rate, limited capacity and efficiency of oxygenation with non-controlled FiO2 (risk of excessive oxygen and induced hypercapnia), and cold and dry gas leading to discomfort and under-humidification of the airways and tracheobronchial secretions. Benefits in terms of work of breathing and CO2 removal resulting from PEEP and pressure support applied during NIV periods could be rapidly lost during standard O2.
Recently, use of high-flow heated and humidified nasal oxygen therapy (HFHO) has gained enthusiasm among intensivists to manage ARF. HFHO delivers high flows (up to 60L/min, that generate moderate PEEP) of heated and humidified oxygen at a controlled and adjustable FiO2 (21 to 100%) that rapidly improve respiratory distress symptoms, oxygenation, respiratory comfort and outcome of patients with hypoxemic ARF.
These unique features of HFHO could overcome some of the drawbacks of standard O2 during SB periods in hypercapnic ARF. Indeed, PEEP effect, washout of nasopharyngeal dead-space limiting CO2 re-breathing and inspired gas conditioning preserving adequate mucosal function and secretion removal, could potentially contribute to decrease airways resistance, intrinsic PEEP and work of breathing, while improving patient comfort. Investigators aim to determine if the use of HFHO, as compared to standard O2, increases the number of ventilator-free days (VFDs) and alive at day 28 in patients with hypercapnic ARF admitted in an ICU, an intermediate care, or a respiratory care unit, and requiring NIV.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Colombes, 92700, France
In both groups, treatment will start with a first NIV session of 2 hours, with arterial blood gas measurement between one hour and two hours after initiating the NIV session. The NIV will be extended for those patients with a pH < 7.30. In both groups, patients will be assessed for their tolerance of NIV and their ability to switch to spontaneous breathing every hour +/- 30 min, except during sleep (10 pm-8 am); they will be assessed for their tolerance of spontaneous breathing and for the need of resumption of NIV every 2 hours+/- 30 min and every 4 +/- 1 hours thereafter. To ensure the consistency of indications of NIV and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) across centers and reduce potential bias, NIV and IMV will be initiated and stopped in the same way in the two groups, using predefined criteria.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Other names: High-flow heated and humidified nasal oxygen therapy (HFHO).
Standard oxygen therapy
Time frame: At day 28 after study enrollment
Time frame: 28 days post-randomisation
Time frame: After 2 hours of SB in the 48 first hours, and every 4 hours thereafter, up to 28 days
Time frame: After 2 hours of SB in the 48 first hours, and every 4 hours thereafter, up to 28 days
Time frame: 28 days post-randomisation
Time frame: 28 days post-randomisation
Time frame: After 2 hours of SB in the 48 first hours, and every 4 hours thereafter; and after 1 hour of NIV; up to 28 days
Time frame: 28 days post-randomisation
Time frame: 28 days post-randomisation
Time frame: 28 days post-randomisation
Time frame: 28 days post-randomisation
Time frame: 28 days post-randomisation
Time frame: 28 days post-randomisation
Time frame: after 1 hour of NIV, up to 28 days
Time frame: after 1 hour of NIV, up to 28 days
Time frame: after 2 hours of SB in the 48 first hours, and every 4 hours thereafter, up to 28 days
Time frame: after 2 hours of SB in the 48 first hours, and every 4 hours thereafter, up to 28 days
Time frame: after 1 hour of NIV, up to 28 days
Time frame: after 1 hour of NIV, up to 28 days
Time frame: after 2 hours of SB in the 48 first hours, and every 4 hours thereafter, up to 28 days
Time frame: after 1 hour of NIV, up to 28 days
Time frame: after 1 hour of NIV, up to 28 days
Time frame: up to 28 days post-randomisation
Time frame: 28 days post-randomisation
Time frame: 28 days post-randomisation
Time frame: 28 days post-randomisation
Time frame: After 2 hours of SB in the 48 first hours, and every 4 hours thereafter; and after 1 hour of NIV; up to 28 days
Time frame: After 2 hours of SB in the 48 first hours, and every 4 hours thereafter; and after 1 hour of NIV; up to 28 days
Time frame: After 2 hours of SB in the 48 first hours, and every 4 hours thereafter; and after 1 hour of NIV; up to 28 days
Time frame: After 2 hours of SB in the 48 first hours, and every 4 hours thereafter; and after 1 hour of NIV; up to 28 days
Time frame: After 2 hours of SB in the 48 first hours, and every 4 hours thereafter; and after 1 hour of NIV; up to 28 days
Time frame: After 2 hours of SB in the 48 first hours, and every 4 hours thereafter; and after 1 hour of NIV; up to 28 days
Time frame: After 2 hours of SB in the 48 first hours, and every 4 hours thereafter; and after 1 hour of NIV; up to 28 days
Time frame: After 2 hours of SB in the 48 first hours, and every 4 hours thereafter; and after 1 hour of NIV; up to 28 days
Time frame: After 2 hours of SB in the 48 first hours, and every 4 hours thereafter; and after 1 hour of NIV; up to 28 days
Time frame: After 2 hours of SB in the 48 first hours, and every 4 hours thereafter; and after 1 hour of NIV; up to 28 days
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Other
Comparison of High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen and Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Ventilatory Support Duration During Acute-on-chronic Respiratory Failure: a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial
Acronym: HIGH FLOW ACRF
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06367686
Apnea, Chronic Disease
Tønsberg, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT05008211
Chronic Disease, Disease Attributes
Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT04351906
AKI, ARDS
Giessen, Hesse, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT06694870
Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure, Hypoventilation
Oslo, Norway
View Trial Details