Use of Intrathecal Analgesia in Appendectomy

Acute appendicitis which is the most common cause of acute abdominal pain, is an acute inflammation of appendix vermiformis. Appendectomy operations can be performed as laparoscopic and open surgery. Addition of opioids to intrathecal local anesthetics to improve the quality of preoperative analgesia is an increasingly used method in recent years. The aim of this study is to compare bupivacaine-fentanyl and bupivacaine-alfentanil which are used intrathecally to create motor and sensory block. 50 volunteer patients who were diagnosed as appendicitis by laboratory tests and clinical diagnostic methods in general surgery clinic and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification I-II (ASA Class I-II) aged between 20-60 years scheduled for laparoscopic appendectomy operation, were included in this study. The patients were randomly assigned into two groups, Group I and Group II. Patients received spinal anesthesia with either 10 mg heavy bupivacaine (2 cc)+25 mcg fentanyl (0.5 cc) intrathecally (Group I, n=25) or 10 mg heavy bupivacaine (2 cc)+250 mcg alfentanil (0.5 cc) intrathecally (Group II, n=25).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Anesthesia Agnosia Analgesia Nervous System Diseases Neurobehavioral Manifestations Neurologic Manifestations Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Perceptual Disorders Signs and Symptoms

Age range

20 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Individuals who will undergo laparoscopic appendectomy operation and volunteer to participate in the study were included.

Exclusion criteria

Individuals who meet the criteria but are not volunteers
Previously underwent appendectomy

Treatment and study plan

25 mcg fentanyl

Drug

Before operation each patient was informed about the use of patient controlled analgesia system and visual pain scale (VPS) for pain scoring. In operating room all patient was monitored using electrocardiography (ECG), noninvasive blood pressure. Before spinal anesthesia 10-15 ml/kg intravenous serum saline infusion was started. Group I received 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine (2 cc) and 25 mcg fentanyl (0.5 cc).

Other names: fentanyl

250 mcg alfentanil

Drug

Before operation each patient was informed about the use of patient controlled analgesia system and visual pain scale (VPS) for pain scoring. In operating room all patient was monitored using electrocardiography (ECG), noninvasive blood pressure. Before spinal anesthesia 10-15 ml/kg intravenous serum saline infusion was started. Group II received 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine (2 cc) and 250 mcg alfentanil (0.5 cc) intrathecally.

Other names: alfentanil

Primary outcomes

Patients diagnosis with appendicitis

Time frame: With the completion of laparoscopic appendectomy operation, average 30 minutes to 1 hour

50 volunteer patients diagnosis with appendicitis by laboratory tests and clinical diagnosis methods in general surgery clinic, aged 20-60 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification I-II (ASA I-II) without contraindication for spinal anesthesia, scheduled for laparoscopic appendectomy operation were included. The patients were randomly assigned into two group.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Nigde Omer Halisdemir University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Bupivacaine-Fentanyl and Bupivacaine-Alfentanil Used Intrathecally in Laparoscopic Appendectomy Surgery

Important dates

Study start: 2013
Primary completion: 2015
Study completion: 2019
First posted: Dec 12, 2019
Registry last updated: Dec 12, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.

Completed