Odense University Hospital
Odense, Odense C, 5000, Denmark
NCT Number: NCT03548753
A prospective, blinded multicenter study for evaluation of chest pain patients with severe coronary calcium (Agatston score > 399). The objective is to evaluate if an initial non-invasive strategy with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) including functional flow reserve derived from CCTA (FFR-CT) is as effective as invasive coronary angiography (ICA) including functional flow reserve (FFR) for the detection and exclusion of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Study hypothesis: initial non-invasive anatomic and functional testing is non-inferior to an invasive anatomic and functional testing strategy.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Odense, Odense C, 5000, Denmark
Prospective, blinded multicenter study evaluating the diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) including functional flow reserve derived from CCTA (FFR-CT) for the detection and exclusion of significant obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). The reference standard vil be invasive coronary angiography (ICA) including functional flow reserve (FFR). Patients referred for elective CCTA because of suspected stable CAD are considered. If the initial routine non-enhanced CT scan shows an Agatston score > 399, the patient is eligible for study inclusion. Four sites in the region of Southern Denmark will participate (Odense University Hospital, Svendborg Hospital, Vejle Hospital and Esbjerg Hospital). A total of 278 patients will be included.
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: Comparison of the noninvasive and invasive diagnostic modalities is performed at least 90 days after enrollment of each of the included patients
The primary outcome measure is the per-patient diagnostic accuracy of functional flow reserve (FFR-CT) derived from standard coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) including functional flow ratio (FFR), which is considered the gold standard in the detection or exclusion of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD)
Time frame: 90 days after inclusion
Percentage of patients with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) including functional flow reserve (FFR) measurement without evidence of obstructive coronary artery disease
Time frame: 90 day after inclusion
Percentage of coronary revascularization procedures (PCI and CABG) in patients with reduced FFR-CT vs. patients with normal FFR-CT
Time frame: 90 days after inclusion
Percentage of patients with the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction or unstable angina hospitalization
Time frame: Within 72 hours after invasive procedure
Percentage of patients with major complications following invasive coronary angiography (ICA) including fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement
Time frame: At least 90 days after patient inclusion
Assessing per-patient and per-vessel diagnostic performance of FFR-CT by means of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value
Time frame: At least 90 days after patient inclusion
The per-vessel correlation of FFRCT numerical value with the FFR numerical value in patients undergoing FFR
Time frame: At least 90 days after patient inclusion
Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of FFR-CT in subgroups of patients with high calcium score (Agatston score 400-999) vs patients with very high calcium score (Agatston score ≥ 999)
Time frame: 90 days after inclusion
Estimating the total costs of potentially unnecessary invasive coronary angiographies with functional flow ratio measurements
Odense University Hospital
Other
Functional and Anatomical Testing in Intermediate Risk Chest Pain Patients With Severe Coronary Calcium Score
Acronym: FACC
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06448715
Observational
Goyang-si, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT06614062
Observational
Chengdu, Sichuan, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06433154
Arthroscopic Surgery, Follow-Up Studies
Lund, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT03138772
Observational
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details