Lao Tropical and Public Health Institute
Vientiane, Vientiane Capital, Laos
NCT Number: NCT06304831
Despite increasing options for public and private health care providers in Laos, choosing a high-quality health provider or a facility is difficult because timely and reliable information about providers is not readily available. People rely on social networks or previous experiences to select providers. However, in Laos, only 28% describe their recent visit to a health care provider as high-quality suggesting that while there are increasing options for care, people may need support to find providers that meet their quality needs. Rapid adoption of mobile phones in Laos, particularly in urban areas, offer opportunities to enhance people's access to timely quality information about health care providers. The study team will use mobile phones to collect and disseminate quality information about providers - known to be valued by Laotians - to improve their access to quality care as well as their overall satisfaction with care.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Vientiane, Vientiane Capital, Laos
While access to health care is expanding globally, there is appreciable variation in the quality of care among providers with low-quality care accounting for up-to 5 million deaths each year. These numbers are expected to grow as more people seek care and as the burden of disease shifts to complex conditions.
Expanding access has also resulted in increasing options for public and private health care providers. Selecting a health provider or a facility, however, is difficult because timely and reliable information about providers is not readily available. People often rely on social networks or previous experiences to select providers. However, in Lao PDR, only 28% describe their recent visit to a health care provider as high-quality, suggesting that while there are increasing options for care, people may need support to find providers that meet their quality needs.
In order to inform efforts to improve people's access to high-quality care, there is a need for evidence on mechanisms to empower people to identify and use high-quality care. In LMICs, majority of efforts to date has focused on supply-side efforts. While there are new initiatives to study population perspectives and people's care experiences, measures to "ignite demand" for high-quality care are not well understood.
The investigators plan to conduct a randomized-controlled experiment using mobile-phones to study whether routinely collected information on quality of care received by peers can improve access to high-quality care and patient satisfaction. The investigators plan to study whether participants switched providers based on the information provided and the type of information mothers used to switch providers. Additionally, The investigators plan to study whether information about providers led women to be more satisfied with health care services for their child or children. Study participants will include mothers living in an urban setting with less than 2-year old children and already enrolled in an on-going VITERBI cohort in Vientiane, the capital city.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Ratings of overall and components of quality (provider knowledge, respectfulness of provider, respectfulness of staff, cleanliness, cost) of health care providers for children will be provided on a webpage. The webpage will be updated every week and participants will be invited to access the latest ratings biweekly.
Time frame: 3 months
The primary outcome of this study is the proportion of mothers that changed their preferred health care facility for non-urgent child care services between baseline and endline surveys. Non-urgent care is defined as children with mild fever of 38 degrees along with cough. During the baseline and endline surveys, participants will be asked to specify their preferred location for non-urgent child care as follows: "If your child is sick tomorrow with mild fever of 38 degrees Celsius and cough, which hospital, clinic or health center will you take your child to?" The primary outcome will be a binary indicator for participants changing their preferred location between baseline and endline.
Time frame: 3 months
The secondary outcome measure will be satisfaction with the health care facility visited most recently for care for their child under age 2. This measure will only be available for mothers seeking care for their child during the study period. This will be a binary variable and satisfaction will be defined as answering "Excellent" or "Very good" (instead of "Good", "Fair", or "Poor") to the question, "How would you rate the overall quality of care you received?", referring to the most recent visit for their child under age 2 within the past 3 months.
Time frame: 3 months
This secondary outcome is the number and types of providers (government health centers, government hospitals, private clinics and private hospitals) visited by mothers for health care for their children during the study period. Every 2 weeks, all enrolled participants will be asked: "Did you visit a health center, hospital or clinic for child in the last two weeks?" using a mobile application. Ones that respond "Yes," will be requested to complete an online survey about the visit, which will ask them to specify the health facility visited.
Time frame: 3 months
This secondary outcome is the proportion of mothers that changed the most recently visited health care facility for child care services between baseline and endline surveys. This measure will be a binary variable and will only be available for caregivers using care both within the three months periods preceding the baseline and endline survey.
Time frame: 3 months
This secondary outcome is the proportion of mothers that used online or digital information sources reasons for choosing providers for non-urgent care. During the baseline and endline surveys, participants will be asked to specify their preferred location for non-urgent child care as follows: "If your child is sick tomorrow with mild fever of 38 degrees Celsius and cough, which hospital, clinic or health center will you take your child to?" After this question, participants will be asked, "Was this choice informed by online or digital information services?" This outcome will be a binary variable.
Time frame: 3 months
This secondary outcome is the proportion of mothers that changed their preferred health care facility for urgent child care services between baseline and endline surveys. Urgent care is defined as children with high fever and a red rash covering their body. During the baseline and endline surveys, participants will be asked to specify their preferred location for urgent child care as follows: "If your child is sick tomorrow with a very high fever of 39-40 degrees and a red rash covering their body, which hospital, clinic or health center will you take your child to?" This outcome will be a binary indicator for participants changing their preferred location for urgent care between baseline and endline.
Time frame: 3 months
This secondary outcome is the proportion of mothers can identify the best place for getting care for sick children based on his/her health problems. During the baseline and endline surveys, all participants will be asked to respond with "Strongly agree," "Agree," "Unsure," "Disagree" or "Strongly disagree" to the following question: "I am able to identify the best place to get care for my child when he/she is sick." This outcome will be a binary variable. Participants responding with "Strongly Agree" or "Agree" will be defined as being confident that they can identify the best place for getting care for sick children and participants responding with "Unsure," "Disagree," or "Strongly Disagree" will be defined as not being confident where to seek care.
Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute
Other
Facility Ratings to Improve Satisfaction With Heath Care for Children
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04107233
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Blood-Borne Infections
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT05657002
Clinical Decision-making, Data Accuracy
Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT04845698
Behavior, Communication
Tainan, Taiwan, R.o.c, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT04000802
Decision Making, Neoplasms
Rabat, Morocco
View Trial Details