NCT Number: NCT02547077
Use of 2-octylcyanoacrylate (Dermabond) Versus 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut During Cutaneous Wound Closure
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of 2-octylcyanoacrylate during repair of linear cutaneous surgery wounds improves scar cosmesis compared to wound closure with 5-0 fast absorbing gut.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
About this study
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of 2-octylcyanoacrylate during repair of linear cutaneous surgery wounds improves scar cosmesis compared to wound closure with 5-0 fast absorbing gut. The investigators will use a split wound model, where half of the wound is treated with 2-octylcyanoacrylate and the other half is repaired with 5-0 fast absorbing gut. Three-months post-surgery, the scar will be measured via the physician observer scar assessment scale, a validated scar instrument. The scar width, and adverse events will also be recorded.
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- 18 years of age or older
- Able to give informed consent themselves
- Patient scheduled for cutaneous surgical procedure with predicted linear closure of 3 cm of longer.
- Willing to return for follow-up visits
Exclusion criteria
- Mentally handicapped
- Unable to understand written and oral English
- Incarceration
- Under 18 years of age
- Pregnant Women
- Wounds with predicted closure length less than 3 cm
Treatment and study plan
Wound Closure with 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut Sutures
ProcedurePrimary outcomes
-
Assessment of Scar on the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale
Time frame: 3 months
After surgical procedure, half of the subject's wound will be with 2-octylcyanoacrylate, while the other half is closed 5-0 fast absorbing gut sutures. After 3 months, subjects will return to clinic for evaluation of the cosmesis of both types of closure techniques.
Secondary outcomes
-
Measurement of Scar Width
Time frame: 3 months
The width of the scar will be measured 1 centimeter from the midline on both sides. There is no defined width that is considered satisfactory or not satisfactory. The measurements will be compared between subjects.
-
Assessment of Complications
Time frame: 3 months
Noting the presence or absence of bleeding, dehiscence, infection or spitting sutures.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
University of California, Davis
Other
Registry information
Official study title
Use of 2-octylcyanoacrylate (Dermabond) Versus 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut During Cutaneous Wound Closure: a Randomized Evaluator Blinded Split Wound Comparative Effectiveness Trial
Important dates
- Study start
- 2015
- Primary completion
- 2015
- Study completion
- 2016
- First posted
- Sep 11, 2015
- Registry last updated
- May 30, 2017
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Undermining During Cutaneous Wound Closure
NCT02289859
Wound Closure Techniques
View Trial DetailsDermal Suturing Only Versus Layered Cutaneous Closure
NCT02383186
Wound Closure Techniques
View Trial DetailsUse of 2-octylcyanoacrylate With Full-thickness Skin Grafts
NCT02550574
Wound Closure Techniques
View Trial DetailsEvaluation of Purse-String Closure Vs Second Intention
NCT02062866
Wound Closure Techniques
Sacramento, California, United States
View Trial Details