Universite Paris Nanterre, Epscp
La Defense, Nanterre, 92001, France
NCT Number: NCT05318651
The development of mobile applications ("mobile apps") is steadily increasing and appears to be a promising treatment method to help people change unwanted behaviors or maintain a regular relationship with the medical system. Mobile apps aimed at smoking cessation have been shown to be effective. However, if a treatment is not used regularly, it will not have the desired effect. The main objective of this study is to identify what makes a person decide to use a smoking cessation app and to do so regularly. The second objective is to determine what is necessary to achieve long-term change with a mobile app.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
La Defense, Nanterre, 92001, France
Despite the significant decrease in tobacco consumption in France (30% in 2000 vs. 25.4% in 2018), the prevalence of smokers aged 18 to 75 years is still a public issue. Among the new solutions proposed, mobile applications ("mobile apps") seem to be a promising treatment modality. Several advantages to their use are recognized for patients, health professionals and the health system itself. Mobile applications allow accessibility to care and information, the possibility of transposing several proven effective therapeutic principles, the possibility of integrating certain forms of information transmission such as messaging, behavioural feedback and audiovisual media.
Although mobile app development is a growing market, knowledge about the determinants of intention to use this type of technology is very limited, especially for smoking cessation apps. The investigators propose a theoretical model to examine what determines the regular use of mobile apps for smoking cessation among those who want to quit. The investigators use the TAMII model and the operational variables used in a more general study on e-health applications. A chronological organisation based on a three-part behavioural model (antecedent, target behaviour and outcome) is added to the TAMII model. The main objective is to identify the factors of Mobila App Sustain Use (MASU). All definitions of TAM-II will be used : perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEOU) and social norm (SN), as well as the definitions proposed by Choi et al (2014) on the predictors of PU, PEOU and SN.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Participants must meet four inclusion criteria for the study:
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Kwit is a mobile app for smoking cessation. Different CBT techniques are used by the app already been proved as effective : Case analysis craving tool, Achievements badges,Diary, Goal (outcome) setting, A 9-steps preparation program, psychological education, Emotional monitoring, Access to groups on social networks, different strategies ( NRT/water/meditation), Motivational cards.
Time frame: Day 1 - First use
The ratio of people accessing the app after giving them access to it.
Time frame: 90 days post firs use of the mobile apps
The ratio of times the application is accessed per week..
Time frame: Day 15
Questionaire : please specify by selecting a number from 1 to 3, with 1 being "Just once", 2 being "Daily" and 3 being "Several times a day", how often you expect to use this application in the course of :
Time frame: Day 30
Questionaire : please specify by selecting a number from 1 to 3, with 1 being "Just once", 2 being "Daily" and 3 being "Several times a day", how often you expect to use this application in the course of :
Time frame: Day 60
Questionaire : please specify by selecting a number from 1 to 3, with 1 being "Just once", 2 being "Daily" and 3 being "Several times a day", how often you expect to use this application in the course of :
Time frame: Day 90
Questionaire : Please specify by selecting a number from 1 to 3, with 1 being "Just once", 2 being "Daily" and 3 being "Several times a day", how often you expect to use this application in the course of :
Time frame: Day 15
The Mobile App Ratting Scale (MARS) scale is a multidimensional metric that ranks and assesses the quality of mobile apps. The MARS total score can be used to evaluate and compare the quality of an application with others. The total score is calculated as the average of its five categories: user engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information and subjective quality. Each category is rated on a five-point scale ranging from inadequate-1 to excellent-5 (25).This scale has been used previously to assess the quality of smoking cessation apps in the Australian market with high inter-rater reliability (ICC =0.807)
Time frame: Day 30
The Mobile App Ratting Scale (MARS) scale is a multidimensional metric that ranks and assesses the quality of mobile apps. The MARS total score can be used to evaluate and compare the quality of an application with others. The total score is calculated as the average of its five categories: user engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information and subjective quality. Each category is rated on a five-point scale ranging from inadequate-1 to excellent-5 (25).This scale has been used previously to assess the quality of smoking cessation apps in the Australian market with high inter-rater reliability (ICC =0.807)
Time frame: Day 60
The Mobile App Ratting Scale (MARS) scale is a multidimensional metric that ranks and assesses the quality of mobile apps. The MARS total score can be used to evaluate and compare the quality of an application with others. The total score is calculated as the average of its five categories: user engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information and subjective quality. Each category is rated on a five-point scale ranging from inadequate-1 to excellent-5 (25).This scale has been used previously to assess the quality of smoking cessation apps in the Australian market with high inter-rater reliability (ICC =0.807)
Time frame: Day 90
The Mobile App Ratting Scale (MARS) scale is a multidimensional metric that ranks and assesses the quality of mobile apps. The MARS total score can be used to evaluate and compare the quality of an application with others. The total score is calculated as the average of its five categories: user engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information and subjective quality. Each category is rated on a five-point scale ranging from inadequate-1 to excellent-5.This scale has been used previously to assess the quality of smoking cessation apps in the Australian market with high inter-rater reliability (ICC =0.807).
Time frame: 1 day before the first use of the mobile app
The degree of dependence is assessed by the Fagerström Test, which is widely used.
Time frame: 1 day before before the first use of the mobile app
The visual analog scale or VAS was used to measure the average craving intensity .
Time frame: Day 15
The visual analog scale or VAS was used to measure the average craving intensity .
Time frame: Day 30
The visual analog scale or VAS was used to measure the average craving intensity .
Time frame: Day 60
The visual analog scale or VAS was used to measure the average craving intensity .
Time frame: Day 90
The visual analog scale or VAS was used to measure the average craving intensity .
Time frame: Day 15
Self-reported 15-day point prevalence smoking status. Since your first use of the app have you smoked a cigarette (even a puff)?
Time frame: Day 30
Self-reported 30-day point prevalence smoking status. Since your first use of the app have you smoked a cigarette (even a puff)?
Time frame: Day 60
Self-reported 60-day point prevalence smoking status. Since your first use of the app have you smoked a cigarette (even a puff)?
Time frame: Day 90
Self-reported 90-day point prevalence smoking status. Since your first use of the app have you smoked a cigarette (even a puff)?
Paris Nanterre University
Other
Determinants of Use of Mobile Apps for Smoking Cessation
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06663020
Behavior, Bronchial Neoplasms
Samsun, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04881630
Behavior, Health Behavior
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04620915
Behavior, Cancer
Eugene, Oregon, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03950427
Behavior, Chemically-Induced Disorders
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial Details