Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07192445

Usability of Graphic Medicine in Psychology Education

This study explores the use of graphic medicine-which includes comics, graphic novels, and illustrations-as an innovative educational tool for psychology students learning about mental health. Traditional teaching methods, such as lectures and textbooks, are effective for delivering theoretical knowledge but may not fully capture the complexity of mental health experiences or encourage the empathy needed for future clinical practice. Graphic medicine offers a visual and narrative approach that can make abstract concepts more tangible, encourage active participation in learning, and foster emotional connection.

The primary aim of the study is to evaluate the usability of mental health-themed graphic novels among psychology students. Usability is assessed using the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ), which measures aspects such as attractiveness, clarity, efficiency, reliability, stimulation, and novelty. Secondary aims include examining changes in students' emotional responses (positive and negative affect), motivation to learn about mental health, enjoyment of reading graphic novels, attitudes toward their use in education, willingness to use them in the future, and perceptions of their validity.

This is a pre-post quasi-experimental study involving psychology students from the University of Málaga. During the intervention, participants read selected excerpts from graphic novels that portray real-life experiences of individuals with mental health conditions, their families, and professionals involved in their care. These narratives aim to bridge the gap between theory and real-life application and evoke empathy.

Before and after the reading activity, students complete self-report questionnaires assessing usability and the secondary variables. Data analysis involves Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired samples, with Bonferroni correction applied to control for multiple comparisons, and a thematic analysis with Atlas.ti.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Málaga

Málaga, Spain

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • . Second-year Psychology students studying Psychopathology.

Exclusion criteria

  • . Students with language barriers.
  • . Students with severe reading or comprehension difficulties.

Treatment and study plan

Reading of Mental Health Graphic Novels

Other

Participants read carefully selected excerpts from graphic novels focused on mental health. These excerpts integrate written narratives with visual storytelling to illustrate daily life challenges, symptoms, interpersonal relationships, and treatment experiences in mental health contexts. The intervention is conducted individually in a supervised classroom environment. Along with the graphic novel, a guide is provided with questions designed to encourage focused and reflective reading.

Primary outcomes

  1. Usability

    Time frame: Before and after the intervention (Baseline and one hour later)

    The User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) is designed to help people reflect on their feelings, impressions, and attitudes associated with the use of a product. It consists of six scales: Efficiency, Perspicuity, and Dependability (pragmatic dimension); Stimulation and Novelty (hedonic dimension); and Attractiveness. It presents 26 items that are evaluated on a scale ranging from -3 to +3, where -3 indicates the most negative response, 0 a neutral response, and +3 the most positive. The results are grouped around six main dimensions, organized into two broad categories: pragmatic quality (which encompasses aspects related to the usability and functionality of the resource) and hedonic quality (linked to the emotional, motivational, and aesthetic dimensions of the experience) (Schrepp, 2015).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Positive and negative affect

    Time frame: Before and after the intervention (Baseline and one hour later)

    The extent to which participants experienced positive (fun, joy, optimism, confidence, gratitude, calm, wonder, happiness, etc.) and negative (stress, fear, irritability, guilt, shame, sadness, hatred, nervousness, shyness, etc.) emotions scored on Likert scales (1-5).

  2. Motivation to learn about mental health

    Time frame: Before and after the intervention (Baseline and one hour later)

    The level of interest, engagement, and willingness of participants to learn about mental health scored on a Likert scale (1-10).

  3. Motivation to read mental health graphic novels

    Time frame: Before and after the intervention (Baseline and one hour later)

    The level of interest and willingness of participants to read mental health graphic novels before and after the intervention scored on a Likert scale (1-10).

  4. Enjoyment of reading mental health graphic novels

    Time frame: Before and after the intervention (Baseline and one hour later)

    The degree to which participants found graphic novels enjoyable, engaging, and satisfactory on a Likert scale (1-10).

  5. Attitudes toward graphic novels

    Time frame: Before the intervention (Baseline and one hour later)

    Participants' perceptions of learning effectiveness, empathy, and content retention when using graphic novels compared to traditional learning methods (e.g., lectures) on a Likert scale (1-10).

  6. Perception of graphic novels in mental health education

    Time frame: After the intervention (One hour later)

    Changes in participants' understanding and conceptualization of graphic novels as educational resources in the context of mental health (yes/no).

  7. Willingness to use mental health graphic novels

    Time frame: Before and after the intervention (Baseline and one hour later)

    The degree to which participants expressed willingness to borrow graphic novels from the Graphic Psychology section of the university library on a Likert scale (1-10).

  8. Content validity of the graphic novels

    Time frame: After the intervention (One hour later)

    The content and format of each graphic novel evaluated on a Likert scale (1 = Does not meet the criterion; 5 = High level of compliance with the criterion) (Escobar-Pérez & Cuervo-Martínez, 2008): a) Comprehensibility: It is presented in a way that the content is easily understood, without confusion or ambiguity; b) Adequacy: It is appropriately tailored to address the selected mental health problem; c) Sufficiency: It includes all essential information to adequately represent the chosen mental health issue; d) Clarity: It is easy to understand, without excessive complexity and using appropriate language; e) Coherence: The narrative and visual elements of the graphic novel remain logical and consistent throughout the story: f) Relevance: The content is directly and significantly linked to the mental health issue addressed; g) Format: The visual structure, typography, and layout of the text in the graphic novel are attractive and functional,.

  9. Reflections

    Time frame: After the intervention (One hour later)

    Open-ended questions: a) Empathy: How did the story make you feel?; b) Application to psychology: How could this content be applied in clinical practice?; c) Visual and narrative representation: What impact have the graphic elements (composition, colors, sizes, facial expressions, etc.) had on your understanding as a reader?

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación de Málaga en Biomedicina y Salud

Other

Collaborators

  • University of Malaga

Registry information

Official study title

Exploring the Usability of Graphic Medicine as an Educational Tool Among Psychology Students

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Sep 25, 2025
Registry last updated
Sep 25, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.